
Social Courage: How 500 Lunches With Strangers Changed My Life with Nick Bendel
Summary What could change if we stopped hesitating and started more conversations? Nick Bendel challenged himself to have lunch with 500 strangers, transforming from someone who preferred staying home with a book into an advocate for social courage. In this conversation, Nick shares what six years of lunches taught him about rejection, confidence, listening and genuine human connection, and why we do not need to feel ready before we take action. Guest Nick Bendel is an author, speaker and social courage expert. His book, The 500 Lunches Effect: How Social Courage Changes Everything, explores the lessons he learnt from meeting 500 strangers over six years. Overview Nick shares how the project began with a flight from Sydney to Melbourne to meet his very first stranger and why approximately 95 per cent of the people he approached never responded. He explains how repeated rejection changed his relationship with fear, why confidence usually follows action rather than preceding it, and what his lunches revealed about listening, insecurity and the difference between being interesting and being genuinely interested. Nick also reflects on the lunches where the chemistry simply was not there, the difference between a connection and a friendship, and the emotional moment he realised lunch number 500 was complete. Key Outtakes Confidence often comes after taking action, not before it Rejection can become something we learn from rather than avoid Good conversationalists focus on being interested Dominating a conversation can sometimes come from anxiety or insecurity We do not need to turn every connection into a friendship for it to have value For more information on Nick Bendel: https://www.nickbendel.com/ The Book: The 500 Lunches Effect How Social Courage Changes Everything https://www.nickbendel.com/book/ Transcript Amy (00:02) Welcome to the Really Good Conversations podcast. Today's guest, Nick Bendel, is an author, speaker and social courage expert who set himself the challenge of having lunch with 500 strangers. Last year, I was lucky enough to be one of them. Nick has now turned the lessons from those conversations into his new book, The 500 Lunches Effect: How Social Courage Changes Everything. Today, we're talking about connection, confidence, curiosity and what can happen when we have the courage to start the conversation. Welcome to the podcast, Nick. Nick (01:07) Thank you for having me, Amy. Amy (01:09) It is so good to reconnect properly. I looked back and realised it was July last year that I became part of your challenge as one of your stranger lunches. It's amazing to see that you've now reached the 500 mark and beyond, and that it has all come to life in a book. We'll talk first about our experience and then get more into your world. Can you remember our lunch, any of our conversation or what your perception was when you met me last year? Nick (01:52) I do remember. You were lunch number 491 out of 500, and we met at a Thai restaurant about 500 metres from where I live. I've been there a few times since and I even remember the table where we were sitting. I remember you telling me about growing up in the UK and then moving to Australia. You were back in the UK during the pandemic, and it was while you were there that you came up with the Really Good Conversations cards. I'm lucky enough to be a proud owner of some of those cards, and I've used them with various friends. You also have a wonderful branding agency. Amy (02:40) I did put you on the spot there, didn't I, just to see what you might say? Even when we had our lunch, I remember being amazed that when I asked you about other people you had met and experiences you had had along the way, you could recount the number of every person you'd spoken to, their name and what they did. I thought it was amazing that you still had all of that knowledge. Was there anything about our lunch that aligned with what you were hoping would come out of this experiment? Nick (03:20) That's an interesting question. There were a few broad things I was hoping to get from the lunches. I'm an introvert. My idea of a good time is staying at home on my own with a cup of tea and a good book, so having these 500 lunches was very out of character. I wanted to improve my social skills, change my mindset, become more comfortable putting myself out there, become more emotionally open and build a great network. Apart from those things, I was very open-minded about how the lunches would develop. I didn't really have any rules other than wanting to meet a diverse range of people of all ages, backgrounds and professions, which I was able to do. When we had lunch, I was simply looking to meet someone different. One thing I noticed from the lunches in general, and from you in particular, was that most of the people I invited never replied, which of course is a no. The minority who did reply tended to be more positive, open-minded and proactive than the average person, and you are that sort of person. There are very few people who would have the social courage to create the conversation cards you created or to start a podcast. I would say the same social courage, positive spirit and open mind that leads a person to do those things is probably what leads them to want to meet a stranger for lunch at a Thai restaurant. Amy (05:13) That's amazing to hear. If you think back to the start of this six-year challenge in 2019, can you recall those first lunches? What were you most nervous about before lunch number one, and what actually happened? Nick (05:34) Lunch number one is an interesting story because I actually borrowed the idea of having lunch with strangers from a woman in Melbourne named Kaylee Chu. She had 100 lunches and published a book about it in 2019. I discovered the book just before she published it, pre-ordered a copy and was really impressed. I was inspired by the positive changes that had come into her life as a result of those 100 lunches, so I thought I should do something similar. I ended up doing 500 rather than 100. I contacted Kaley and said, "I've just read your book. It's amazing, and you've inspired me to have 500 lunches. Would you do me the honour of being my very first lunch? I'm based in Sydney and you're in Melbourne, so if that's okay with you, I'll fly to Melbourne to have lunch with you." To my delight, she sent me a very friendly reply and said she would like to have lunch. I remember that day very well. It was 27 August 2019. I woke up at 5.00 am at my home in Sydney and left at about 5.15 am. I walked roughly two kilometres to the train station, caught the train to the airport, flew to Melbourne and then took a bus into the centre of the city. I walked into the restaurant where she was waiting for me, and we had lunch for about two and a half hours. She was very confident and poised because she'd had a lot of these lunches. I was nervous and wasn't really sure what was going on, but she was very kind and helped me through it. After our wonderful lunch, I caught a bus back to the airport, flew to Sydney, took the train back towards home and then walked the rest of the way. I walked through the door at 9.00 pm. It was a really intense day and one I'll never forget. Amy (07:29) When you describe yourself as an introvert whose idea of a good time is staying home with a cuppa and a book, that sounds like quite a mammoth day. Nick (07:40) That's a very good point. I hadn't thought about it that way, but yes, flying 1,000 kilometres to have lunch with someone is a mammoth day. Amy (07:50) For people listening, it's worth remembering that you genuinely didn't know Kaylee Chu. You travelled across the country to have lunch with a complete stranger, which many people would find incredibly daunting. You must have approached a lot of people to secure those 500 lunches. How did people tend to respond when you invited them? Did you receive more rejections than acceptances? Nick (08:29) Absolutely. Probably 95 per cent of the people rejected me, and almost all of them said no by not replying. In six years, I think only three, four or perhaps five people replied to say no. I don't hold it against the people who weren't interested. You only need one reason to say no. They might have been busy, thought it was some sort of scam, or assumed I was trying to sell them something or convert them to my religion. Who knows? If someone had invited me to lunch before I started this challenge, I would have said no. I was the introvert who liked being at home on his own. There's no way I would have had lunch with a stranger, so I don't hold it against anyone for not wanting to meet. But the overwhelming majority of people who said no did so by not replying. Amy (09:28) What did that teach you about rejection? Did it knock your confidence at first, and did it become easier to deal with over time? Rejection is something a lot of people fear. Nick (09:47) I'm really glad you brought that up because it was one of the most profound lessons I could have learnt and became transformative in my life. It ultimately led to this concept I became so passionate about: social courage. Social courage means doing something when you don't feel ready, or when you feel you might be judged, criticised, mocked or rejected. There are so many things in life that we want to do, but we hesitate because we're worried about the reaction. When I started sending invitations and people didn't reply, I remember telling myself, "Nick, don't take it personally. It's not personal." That helped, but part of you still feels bad, especially when someone seems really interesting and you hope they want to meet you, but they don't reply. That can be deflating. Through being rejected so many times, I won't say I became immune to rejection, but I developed a different relationship with it. I stopped seeing rejection as the enemy and started seeing it as a friend. I now think rejection isn't something to avoid; it's something to actively pursue, because you can't get good things without risking rejection, and often a lot of it. Receiving all those rejections taught me a valuable life lesson. I'm now comfortable with rejection, and that gives me the opportunity to ask for things I wouldn't have asked for in the past. Amy (11:40) That is brilliant. You've mentioned how capable people are often held back by hesitation, and perhaps we're more capable than we think. What role does hesitation play in the way we connect with people we don't know? Nick (11:59) I think it's massive, in both our professional and personal lives. Generally, when we don't do something that would benefit us, it's not because we don't know we should do it, because we don't understand the benefit, because we lack motivation or even because we don't know how. It's because we hesitate. We worry about how other people might react. Are they going to laugh at us, judge us, call us an idiot or mock us? Are they going to ask what gives us the right to do that? Are we going to feel embarrassed or humiliated? We hesitate at the key moment. I'm generalising, but what stops us is usually not a lack of knowledge or motivation. It's a psychological blockage. If we can overcome that hesitation and build more relationships, both personally and professionally, we're likely to experience more happiness and success in both areas of our lives. The key is not to think there's something wrong with us for experiencing hesitation and doubt. It's perfectly normal, and everyone goes through it. We also shouldn't think we need to become confident before taking action. Confidence comes after the action. Doing scary things where you would normally hesitate is what gives you confidence. Amy (13:42) If we think about what makes a really good conversation, what did this experience teach you about the difference between being interesting and being interested in people? Nick (14:02) I would say being interested is more important than being interesting because, ironically, if you are interested in people, even if they do most of the talking, they're going to think you're interesting. I'm reminded of three things I learnt from people I had lunch with. One was a man named Ronnie. He told me that when he meets someone, he tries to give them the opportunity to speak about something they're really passionate about. I borrowed that idea and found it's a good way to build rapport. If I give you the opportunity to talk about something you're passionate about, whether that's the podcast, the conversation cards or your family, you're going to engage with the conversation and it will mean something to you. That helps us build rapport. It works well, but it's not a trick. You need to be sincere. When you are sincere, the other person senses that and opens up to you in a genuine way. I learnt another valuable lesson from a man named John. He told me that all of us like to teach one or more things to other people, usually something we're passionate about. If you give someone the opportunity to teach you something, it makes them feel valued and can lead to a great connection because they're able to share knowledge that matters to them. Even though they're doing most of the talking, they're likely to think you're a really good conversationalist. The third piece of advice came from one of my early lunch dates, a woman named Julie. She told me that when she goes to a networking event and meets someone for the first time, she pretends they are the most interesting person in the room. Once she frames it that way in her mind, it immediately changes her body language and mindset. If Amy is the most interesting person in the world, I'm going to hang on every word she says and listen closely. You'll sense that, you'll open up and we'll have a great connection. I implemented those three tips a few years ago, and they're incredibly valuable. They lead to much better conversations because you make the other person feel valued and respected, which helps you build rapport much more quickly. Amy (16:53) I love that. I had some questions about how we can help someone feel safe enough to move beyond small talk, and I think everything you've shared can help with that. What do you think most people misunderstand about being a good listener? Nick (17:12) I don't want to be too critical, but most of us are not very good listeners. Most people think listening means keeping quiet until it's their turn to talk. They're not really listening actively. When you're not actively listening, it shows through your body language, and the other person can pick up on it. This all happens at an unconscious level, but much of communication is non-verbal. The biggest thing people get wrong about listening is that they're not really doing it. As a result, they send negative non-verbal cues that the other person picks up on unconsciously, creating tension between them. If we put aside our need to talk and impress the other person, and instead adopt the mindset that everyone has something interesting to share and something we can learn from, we will listen more closely. That will show through our body language, and we'll have a much better connection and conversation. Amy (18:40) That makes me think about the other side of it. What have you discovered when you're talking to a total chatterbox who leaves very little space for you to take part in the conversation? Nick (19:05) That's a very good question. I've changed the way I think about people who do a lot of talking. In the past, I probably would have said, "That person was really annoying. They wouldn't stop talking or let me get a word in." Now, after having lunch with so many different types of people, including many who dominated the conversation, I have a different view. Often, although not always, it's not because they're self-absorbed, don't care what you have to say or don't want to listen. It's because they're feeling anxious and insecure. When we feel that way in a conversation, talking about ourselves can feel most comfortable because there's nothing in the world we know better than ourselves. Often, when someone won't stop talking, it can be due to insecurity. Rather than feeling annoyed, I now tend to empathise with them. I try to see things from their point of view, understand them and get a sense of why they might be talking so much. If they're nervous, I look for opportunities to make them feel more comfortable. I've noticed that the more comfortable they feel, the less likely they are to control the conversation and the more likely they are to turn it into a back-and-forth exchange. Amy (20:46) I can relate to talking more when I'm nervous because silence can feel uncomfortable. From your experience, and without naming names, were there any lunches where you thought, "This is a challenge. This isn't going how I expected it to go"? Nick (21:34) There were perhaps half a dozen lunches where we really struggled to find any chemistry. I never thought it was the other person's fault, and I never thought it was mine. I saw it as the luck of the draw. I have a certain personality, they have a certain personality, and sometimes they simply don't come together. On those occasions, I tried hard to make the conversation flow, and often the other person did as well, but sometimes it just didn't work. If you meet enough people, sooner or later that's going to happen. Amy (22:14) You've met hundreds of people. What did the project teach you about the difference between connection and friendship? Nick (22:25) Friendship requires some form of emotional connection, which is often down to how two personalities come together. It also requires emotional openness from both parties, as well as some commonality in interests and values. That is very different from a casual acquaintance or connection. You can have perfectly good and enjoyable relationships with casual contacts: someone you talk to occasionally at work, someone you meet through business circles or a parent you see each weekend at your child's sport. Those conversations might last only a few minutes and then be over. We don't need to put pressure on ourselves to turn every connection into a strong friendship. Casual acquaintances can be enough, although it's also important to have a few strong friends. I tend to think we shouldn't force it. If you feel you need more friends, instead of trying to force a friendship with everyone you meet, try to meet more people. The more people you meet, the more likely you are to develop a genuine friendship. Amy (24:08) I love that. It can become more difficult to make new friends as adults, particularly as we move through different stages of life or relocate somewhere new. I'd like to touch on the book itself. The challenge took place over six years, so at what point did you think this experience could become a book? Nick (24:56) It was very late in the process. I think I started writing it six to eight weeks before I finished the lunches. Throughout those six years, many people asked whether I was planning to write a book. I always said, "I don't have plans to write a book, and I don't have plans not to write one. I'll get to the end and decide." Once I reached the end, I decided I would like to write a book because I wanted a record of my experiences. Having those 500 lunches was the best thing I've ever done in my life. If I didn't create some kind of record, I felt I might look back in five or ten years and regret it. I was never motivated by money. I have nothing against money, and if people listening want to give me a lot of it, I'm not going to talk them out of it. But most books sell either no copies or very few, so if you write a book to make money, you're almost certainly going to be disappointed. My goal was to create a record of my experience and write something meaningful. If I achieved those things, it wouldn't matter whether one person or a million people bought the book. Amy (26:28) You typically wrote a LinkedIn post after each lunch, capturing information about the person and some takeaways from the conversation. When you returned from each lunch, did you have a process for documenting your feelings, observations or anything else you had picked up? Did you create a log of some kind? Nick (26:55) I may have had an advantage because I used to be a journalist. Before I began the lunches, I had already become skilled at listening to people, gathering information, sorting it in my head, deciding what belonged in a story and working out the order and angle. After each lunch, while I was travelling home, much of that process happened naturally in my mind through years of habit. There was often a particular reason I wanted to meet someone. They might have had an interesting job, done something in their past that interested me or been pursuing a project I wanted to learn about. Because there was usually one thing that led me to want to meet them, I would ask a million questions about it because I was genuinely curious. That would naturally form the angle of the post because it was what most of our conversation had been about. Some of the posts almost wrote themselves. Amy (28:03) When you completed the book and looked back across the whole journey, were there any lessons that only came to light through the writing process? Nick (28:27) That's a really good question. Writing the book forced me to take a lot of information that was buried deep inside me and articulate it. To put it another way, and I think I'm paraphrasing Carl Jung, I was making the unconscious conscious. This is information you already know because it's buried inside you, but once you articulate it, you suddenly understand it better. That certainly happened to me with the idea of social courage. Social courage was a theme throughout my lunches, but it had never been articulated, so I wouldn't have been able to explain it. I was practising social courage by organising the lunches and contacting people, most of whom never replied. I also noticed that many of the people I met were very successful or had achieved amazing goals, sometimes in their personal lives, and so many of them had displayed social courage. There were also occasions when they lamented not doing something. Often, the reason they hadn't done it wasn't because they didn't want to or didn't know how. It was because they were worried about what other people would say. Social courage was a theme throughout the lunches, but I wasn't consciously aware of it until I sat down to write the book. That's when it gradually emerged. Amy (30:12) It sounds as though the experience gave you a different perspective on many of the people you met, from the chatterboxes to those with whom there wasn't an immediate connection. But you couldn't stop at 500. How did it feel to reach the end, and what does the continuation of the project look like? Nick (31:05) I'm going to keep having these lunches forever because, when I say it was the best thing I've ever done, that isn't hyperbole. I mean it literally. If it's the best thing I've ever done, why would I stop? I remember reaching my 500th lunch. The two of us walked to the front of the restaurant to pay, then he left while I went back inside to use the bathroom. We said goodbye, I closed the bathroom door and suddenly a wave of emotion flooded over me because I was alone behind that door. I thought, "Wow, this is now over. This incredible adventure is over. I've met so many remarkable people, learnt so much and made some really good friends." I became emotional for a while, but I never wanted it to stop. I'm continuing to meet people. In the 11 months since I finished, I've had lunch with another 19 people. The pace has slowed considerably. Previously, it was 500 lunches over six years, or a little more than 80 a year. Now I'm doing around 19 or 20 a year, and for the foreseeable future it will continue at that slower pace. These lunches give me the opportunity to meet amazing people, learn, improve my social skills and practise social courage, so why would I ever want to stop? Amy (32:39) I love that. It's exactly how I feel about this podcast. Doing these things opens you up to experiences and people you might not otherwise encounter. Before we move on to some Really Good Conversations questions, I'd like to touch on the increasingly digital world we live in. You started this challenge in 2019, so what happened during the COVID period when we were in and out of lockdowns? Did you pause the project or move any of it online? Nick (33:20) I'm in Sydney and, for those who aren't familiar with what happened here, we had two lockdowns: one in 2020 and another in 2021. During the first lockdown, I had Zoom lunches. They were good, but not as good as the real thing. During Sydney's second lockdown in 2021, I decided against having any Zoom lunches because I wanted to wait for face-to-face meetings. One benefit of those Zoom lunches was the opportunity to meet people from outside Sydney. If I was going to have a Zoom lunch with someone in Sydney, I might as well wait and meet them face to face. So many of the people I met on Zoom were in other parts of Australia or overseas. Amy (34:13) That is one of the benefits of the digital space. From experiencing both formats, what do face-to-face conversations offer that digital communication can't fully replicate? Nick (34:28) Face-to-face conversation is so much better because so much communication is non-verbal. It's body language and tone. You do get some sense of both through video, but it isn't the same. There's something about being opposite someone in real life that leads to a deeper conversation, a more powerful connection and a more lasting relationship. Amy (35:02) Thank you for everything you've shared. It's a fascinating topic, and I love the challenge and experience you've been through. I can see how it will continue to evolve and adapt. I'm now going to ask you some questions from our cards, and I'm pleased to hear that you've used your pack with some of your friends. Question number one: if you came with a warning label, what would it say? Nick (35:36) This one's easy: "Warning: this guy will ask you a lot of questions." Amy (35:41) Brilliant. Question number two: what is one piece of wisdom you would like to pass on to future generations? Nick (35:53) Start before you feel ready. Amy (35:59) I love that. Question number three: what is the biggest misconception people have about you? Nick (36:08) This might sound a bit strange. Quite a few of the people I had lunch with had heard of me before I contacted them because they had been reading about the lunches on LinkedIn. I think they assumed that, because I was meeting all these people, I would be very gregarious, outgoing and talkative. I'm actually the opposite, and I think that surprised a lot of people. Amy (36:44) I love that answer. Has there been a particular conversation that changed the direction of your life or had a profound effect on you? Nick (37:01) Not one particular conversation, but the lunches as a whole made me much more open-minded and emotionally open. Amy (37:16) The final question I ask all my guests is: if you could ask anyone, dead or alive, one question, who would it be and what would you ask? Nick (37:25) I'm going to choose Oprah. One thing I've always admired about her is her incredible people skills and ability to build relationships with all kinds of people. I would ask, "Oprah, what is your number one tip for building relationships with people you've just met?" Amy (37:53) That would be a great answer to hear. Nick, it's been so good catching up with you and having this conversation. Where can our listeners find out more about you? I'll include the links in the show notes. Nick (38:09) Thank you, Amy, for the wonderful chat. People can visit my website, nickbendel.com, or find me on LinkedIn. Amy (38:17) Fantastic. I look forward to hearing about your upcoming lunches and what you do next. You'll need a new challenge after this one. Nick (38:26) Thanks, Amy.










