The Western Bubble

Hosted by Balder Hageraats & Dario Hasenstab

BusinessInterviews guests

Website RSS feed

Episodes

191

Latest episode

Aug 2026

Language

About the show

The West is suffering from the "Western Bubble" and as a result, the world suffers from it as well. In this podcast, Balder Hageraats and Dario Hasenstab examine how Western countries are increasingly lost in their own delusions on the world stage and what must be done to bring them back to reality. Understanding and acknowledging this phenomenon is crucial. It allows both Western and non-Western actors to much better navigate the current era of global uncertainty. 🎙️ What we analyse: • Geopolitics & Global Power Shifts • Human Rights & Development Aid • Institutional Decline & Foreign Policy All analysed strictly through the lens of the Western Bubble. Executive Producer: Stefani Obradovic.

Listen to episodes

60 recent

September 7, 202647 min

Scaring Ourselves Into Decline #155

We are back from the August break, and after a month away from current affairs we take stock of what happened while the Deep Dive series ran. The thread running through most of it is a familiar one: a vague but insistent fear that Russia is about to invade Europe, unattached to any concrete scenario, and the damage that fear does to the societies gripped by it. We start with Ceuta and the drones at Leipzig airport, two stories that reveal less about Russia than about how the West now absorbs news, through emotion and conspiracy rather than evidence. From there we look at how the threat gets put to use. Britain war-games a Russian attack because the part of freedom's defender still suits its self-image. Norway drills for oil and gas in the Arctic and files it under security. The Dutch government cuts welfare to fund defence spending it could not otherwise justify. In each case a fear that cannot be specified is enough to license policies a confident society would refuse, much as the war on terror did after 2001. We close on the missed opportunity. As the transatlantic alliance falls apart and Iceland votes against joining, the European Union has offered no vision worth signing up to. And we leave you on a cliffhanger, because next week we launch a new project from Western Bubble Insights & Strategy. This podcast is an individual project between us, Dario Hasenstab and Balder Hageraats. We are supported by our producer Stefani Obradovic from Western Bubble Insights & Strategy. If you would like to get in touch with us, write us an email at thewesternbubble@gmail.com .

August 31, 202643 min

Deep Dive S2E4: How the West Lost the End of History

The fourth and final Deep Dive of the season arrives at the 21st century, the point where our four-part history of liberal political ideology turns from triumph to neglect. Unleashed in the 18th century, consolidated in the 19th, triumphant in the 20th, liberal democracy now enters what we call the Age of Apathy. Its victory in the last century was not the end of an inevitable path, but the product of specific conditions: the spread of literacy, the independence of intellectuals from their patrons, and the productive clash of competing ideas. Those conditions are eroding, and with them the foundations the West spent three centuries building. In the discussion that follows the essay, we take apart how that erosion works. Liberal democracy held power to account only when literate, educated masses stood behind the intellectuals who challenged the status quo. Reading was the necessary, though not sufficient, condition for it: the slow, calm processing of ideas that lets ordinary citizens judge an argument rather than react to a feeling. Neoliberalism reduced politics to management, the internet replaced contemplation with a cacophony of millions of voices, and ideology itself became a term of abuse. The result is a public that reacts rather than reasons, and a leadership class free to do as it likes because nobody is left to hold it to account. We also ask what is lost when ideology dies. Not only the corrective that pulls a society back when it drifts too far in one direction, but the ability to imagine a future at all, to say what kind of country one wants in fifty years rather than managing the next four. That absence is what leaves the West drifting towards a plutocratic dystopia it never chose and does not resist. Liberal democracy can still be saved, but only if the right questions are asked and answered with something more than managerial reflexes. This podcast is an individual project between us, Dario Hasenstab and Balder Hageraats. We are supported by our producer Stefani Obradovic from Western Bubble Insights & Strategy. If you would like to get in touch with us, write us an email at thewesternbubble@gmail.com .

August 24, 202637 min

Deep Dive S2E3: How Liberal Democracy Won

In the third episode of our Deep Dive series on liberal political ideology, we arrive in the 20th century: the most violent, destructive and ultimately transformative hundred years in the history of the West. The century opens with the collision of the old and the new. The great power politics of absolute monarchies met the ideological energy of the 19th century's mass movements, and the system had no framework capable of containing that clash. What followed were two world wars, the rise of fascism, the Holocaust, and approximately 75 million deaths. But running through that destruction was a process of elimination: one by one, the alternatives to liberal democracy were tested to breaking point and failed. Fascism was defeated militarily. Communism collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions. By the second half of the century, liberal democracy was the last serious idea standing, and it delivered on its promises in a way no previous system had: welfare states, compulsory education, civil rights, decolonisation, rising life expectancy, and the most sustained improvement in human wellbeing in recorded history. In our discussion, Balder and Dario trace how the United States, as the inheritor of the European liberal tradition without the burden of Europe's colonial guilt, became the vehicle for that post-war vision, and why the 1990s, the apparent decade of triumph following the Soviet collapse, were also the moment liberal democracy stopped asking the questions that had made it great. The strength of liberal democracy is its dynamic nature: its willingness to absorb competing ideas, self-correct and build. The moment it declared itself finished, it began to die. That is the story of the 21st century, and the subject of our final episode next week. This podcast is an individual project between us, Dario Hasenstab and Balder Hageraats. We are supported by our producer Stefani Obradovic from Western Bubble Insights & Strategy. If you would like to get in touch with us, write us an email at thewesternbubble@gmail.com .

August 18, 202633 min

Deep Dive S2E2: The Century That Consolidated Liberal Democracy

In the second episode of our Deep Dive series on liberal political ideology, we move into the 19th century, the most turbulent, violent and intellectually fertile period in the history of the modern West. The 19th century was not a comfortable place to live. Factories belched smoke over overcrowded cities, children worked in mines, colonial violence was being inflicted on much of the world, and ideological conflict between communists, anarchists, liberals, conservatives and monarchists produced genuine political violence alongside the pamphlets and parliamentary debates. But running through all of that turbulence was something historically unprecedented: the belief, held by an ever-growing share of the population, that society could be shaped by human action. That tomorrow did not have to look like today. Our video essay traces how the intellectual seeds of the Enlightenment became practical political movements in the 19th century, driven by rising literacy, the power of the printing press, trade unions, mass mobilisation and the spectacular optimism generated by rapid technological progress. Steam trains, early bicycles, the first automobiles, the 1900 Paris World Fair: these were not just engineering achievements. They were proof that humans could bend the future to their will. And when that belief in human agency combines with an increasingly literate and politically engaged working and middle class, the result is the intellectual foundation for liberal democracy. In our discussion, Balder and Dario ask why we do not feel that same optimism today, even though the technological changes around us are at least as dramatic. The answer, they argue, is that the 19th century had something we have largely lost: genuine ideological debate about where society should go, carried by people who believed their participation in that debate actually mattered. This podcast is an individual project between us, Dario Hasenstab and Balder Hageraats. We are supported by our producer Stefani Obradovic from Western Bubble Insights & Strategy. If you would like to get in touch with us, write us an email at thewesternbubble@gmail.com .

August 10, 202640 min

Deep Dive S2E1: The Intellectual Revolution That Built the West

This is the first episode of our second Deep Dive series, in which we explore the rise and fall of liberal political ideology in the West. Over four episodes published throughout August, we trace how ideas, and the intellectual cultures that produced them, built the world we live in today, and why the abandonment of that tradition is at the heart of the crisis the West now finds itself in. We begin in the 18th century. Europe was gearing up to unshackle itself from centuries of despotic monarchy. The printing press had created an educated, knowledge-hungry middle class that was no longer under the control of traditional religious or aristocratic hierarchies. Philosophers and political thinkers, drawing on foundations laid during the Renaissance and the Scientific Revolution, began applying empiricism and reason not just to the natural world but to the political one. The result was a flowering of ideas, from Rousseau, Voltaire and Montesquieu in France to Locke and Hume in Britain, that would transform how the West understood itself and what it believed government was for. In our discussion, Balder and Dario examine why the 18th century matters so much, how intellectualism only becomes politically transformative when it connects with a sufficiently educated and literate mass population, and what the difference is between the ideological debates of that era and the tribal noise that passes for political conversation today. We are, as Balder puts it, more tribal but less ideological than at any point in the past two centuries. The 21st century is not short of opinions. It is short of ideas. This podcast is an individual project between us, Dario Hasenstab and Balder Hageraats. We are supported by our producer Stefani Obradovic from Western Bubble Insights & Strategy. If you would like to get in touch with us, write us an email at thewesternbubble@gmail.com .

August 3, 202645 min

The Party Is Over, Grab What You Can #154

This week we look at two stories that share a single underlying logic: the people running things have stopped pretending to care about the original purpose of the institutions they control, and are now just taking what they can before the music stops. The first is FIFA. Gianni Infantino announced this week that FIFA, a nonprofit organisation founded to promote and regulate football around the world, will create a for-profit subsidiary and sell 20 percent of its stake to private investors, with Joshua Kushner, brother of Jared Kushner and son-in-law of Donald Trump, among those involved. We discuss why this is the logical endpoint of decades of slow institutional decay, and why UEFA, despite its own complicated record, finds it surprisingly easy to be the good guys here. The second is the SpaceX IPO. Elon Musk bypassed the standard investor road show, set a valuation with no serious basis in the company's financials, ran a targeted marketing campaign at retail investors who worship him, and had SpaceX included in the Nasdaq composite index within 15 days of listing when the standard timeline is three months to a year. Index funds were then legally required to buy SpaceX shares, transferring wealth from ordinary pension holders to the richest man in the world and his Saudi co-investors. We close with an announcement: we are going on our summer break. The deep dive series begins on August 10th and runs through August 31st, taking listeners from the Enlightenment through the 19th century institutionalisation of liberal democracy, through the 20th century peak, and into the 21st century collapse. Regular weekly episodes resume on September 7th. This podcast is an individual project between us, Dario Hasenstab and Balder Hageraats. We are supported by our producer Stefani Obradovic from Western Bubble Insights & Strategy. If you would like to get in touch with us, write us an email at thewesternbubble@gmail.com .

August 3, 202612 min

Autopsy #16 Elon Musk vs the Economist

In this week's Autopsy we react to an interview the Economist published with Elon Musk, conducted by Editor-in-Chief Zanny Minton Beddoes. We focus on the section where Musk talks about artificial intelligence, because it contains three logical steps in quick succession, none of which hold up to even basic scrutiny. The tragedy is not Musk himself. It is that a man whose reasoning on these questions is this visibly incoherent is one of the most influential voices shaping how AI develops, and that so many people still take him seriously. This podcast is an individual project between us, Dario Hasenstab and Balder Hageraats. We are supported by our producer Stefani Obradovic from Western Bubble Insights & Strategy. If you would like to get in touch with us, write us an email at thewesternbubble@gmail.com .

July 27, 202643 min

The Siege Mentality: Argentina & Israel #153

This week we start with the World Cup final. Spain beat Argentina, Argentina's players started fights during the game, declined to return the guard of honour as Spain lifted the trophy, and the internet went into overdrive. We are not a football podcast, but what happened afterwards is worth examining: within days, the anti-Argentina sentiment online had reached a scale that Argentinians themselves found bewildering and disproportionate. They are not entirely wrong about that. But their response, fighting back and dismissing it as manufactured conspiracy, is exactly the wrong one. The concept that links Argentina, Israel, and a few other cases we discuss is siege mentality: the collective belief that the rest of the world has negative intentions towards your group, leading to a closing of ranks, a dismissal of outside criticism, and a retreat into tribal identity. It explains why Argentina cannot seem to understand why the world found its football team unlikeable this summer. It explains far more about Israel than any individual policy decision can. And it explains why, in both cases, the countries concerned are actively damaging their own long-term interests while convinced they are defending them. We discuss how siege mentality develops, how it spreads from the most hardline members of a society to the reasonable centre under sufficient pressure, and why it is particularly tragic in Israel's case, given how much diplomatic capital was spent in the years before October 7th building exactly the international relationships that the subsequent reaction has now destroyed. The question is not whether the feeling is understandable. It usually is. The question is whether it is constructive. The answer, in every case we look at today, is no. This podcast is an individual project between us, Dario Hasenstab and Balder Hageraats. We are supported by our producer Stefani Obradovic from Western Bubble Insights & Strategy. If you would like to get in touch with us, write us an email at thewesternbubble@gmail.com .

July 24, 202614 min

Autopsy #15 Travel Influencers and the UN General Assembly

In this week's Autopsy we react to two travel influencers who responded to a UN General Assembly vote on slavery by advising their followers which countries are unsafe to travel to based on how those countries voted. The video is well-intentioned and the sensitivity behind it is entirely understandable. The analysis is not. The resolution in question called the trafficking of enslaved Africans and the racialized chattel enslavement of Africans the gravest crime against humanity. The United States, Israel and Argentina voted against. Roughly 50 countries abstained, most of them European. The influencers interpreted this as a vote between countries that think slavery is bad and countries that think it is acceptable, and drew travel safety conclusions accordingly. That is not what happened. We discuss why this matters. Not because the influencers are bad people, but because collapsing a complex diplomatic vote into a binary of good countries and bad countries actively blocks the serious conversations that the topic of slavery, reparations and European responsibility actually deserves. This podcast is an individual project between us, Dario Hasenstab and Balder Hageraats. We are supported by our producer Stefani Obradovic from Western Bubble Insights & Strategy. If you would like to get in touch with us, write us an email at thewesternbubble@gmail.com .

July 20, 20261 hr 2 min

The Establishment Is Panicking #152

This week we look at a pattern that has been building for years and is now accelerating: the establishment panicking, and the increasingly desperate measures it is reaching for in response. The AfD ban report in Germany, the EU Parliament procedure against the Europe of Sovereign Nations party, the removal of Hungary's president, and the Le Pen conviction all arrived within weeks of each other. They are not the same story, but they rhyme, do they? We start with the deeper question of why the establishment finds itself here. The short answer is that it stopped having ideas. Neoliberal managerialism replaced political vision, triangulation replaced conviction, and the result is a political class that can tell you the inflation target but cannot tell you what kind of society it wants to build in twenty-five years. Into that vacuum, populists of the left and the right stepped with a simpler offer: here is your enemy, and we will fight them for you. Voters, being emotional rather than rational creatures, responded. And once anchored to that tribal identity, they do not let go when the populist fails to deliver. They simply find the next one. We then work through the case studies. The EU procedure against ESN is philosophically incoherent: you cannot claim to defend liberal democracy by deciding which parties are allowed to participate in it. The AfD ban report raises a genuinely harder question, since Germany's constitution explicitly anticipates this scenario, but the legal and political processes need to stay separate or the cure becomes the disease. Hungary under Magyar is the most complex: purging Orbán's system using some of Orbán's methods, restructuring public broadcasting by decree, removing the president through a tailor-made constitutional amendment. Some of it is defensible. Some of it sets precedents that will outlast Magyar's good intentions. And Le Pen, twice convicted, is running for president, because the electorate she is appealing to has long since stopped holding corruption against the people who tell them what they want to hear. This podcast is an individual project between us, Dario Hasenstab and Balder Hageraats. We are supported by our producer Stefani Obradovic from Western Bubble Insights & Strategy. If you would like to get in touch with us, write us an email at thewesternbubble@gmail.com .