The HR Investigations Podcast

Hosted by RPC HR

Business Management

Website RSS feed

Episodes

Latest episode

Jun 2026

Language

About the show

The HR Investigations Podcast: Exploring the Issues, Challenges, Strategies, and Solutions New episodes available bi-weekly

Listen to episodes

60 recent

June 15, 2026Episode 707 min

Can the Steward Call a Timeout? The Recess Question

Episode Summary During an investigatory interview, a single question can suddenly reveal the true focus of an investigation. A union steward who initially has little context may immediately recognize that the employee could be facing serious disciplinary consequences. Can the steward stop the interview and request a private consultation? Is that considered protected representation activity under Weingarten, or does it cross the line into impermissible coaching? In this episode, we examine one of the most frequently debated issues in workplace investigations: the union steward's right to request a recess after hearing questions that reveal the direction of the investigation. We explore the distinction between legitimate representation and obstruction, discuss how investigators should respond, and provide practical guidance for HR professionals, labor relations practitioners, workplace investigators, managers, and union representatives. What You'll Learn Understanding the Purpose of Weingarten Representation Why Weingarten rights exist and what they are intended to protect. The difference between passive observation and active representation. How effective representation can require private consultation during an interview. Why fairness and due process are critical components of workplace investigations. When a Recess Request May Arise Situations where a steward may not fully understand the allegations until questioning begins. How investigative questioning can reveal facts, allegations, or potential policy violations that were previously unknown. Why an employee may become confused, anxious, or uncertain after hearing a key question. Common triggers that prompt a request for a private consultation. The Difference Between Advising and Coaching Natalie discusses the critical distinction between: Appropriate Representation Helping the employee understand a question. Clarifying facts and timelines. Ensuring the employee understands the allegations. Encouraging complete and truthful responses. Protecting the employee's rights during questioning. Improper Conduct Telling the employee what story to tell. Encouraging dishonesty or omission of facts. Directing the employee to provide misleading information. Deliberately obstructing the investigative process. How Investigators Should Respond Why a reasonable recess request should generally be granted. Best practices for maintaining control of the interview while respecting representation rights. Setting reasonable expectations regarding the duration of breaks. Managing repeated requests for consultation. Maintaining professionalism during potentially tense moments. Who Should Listen: HR and Employee Relations professionals, investigators, and managers responsible for internal investigations or compliance. Get Trained by Natalie on how to conduct investigations: Natalie’s next 2-day Certificate Program virtual workshop to gain the skills, tools, and confidence to handle any investigation effectively—before a costly mistake happens. The next virtual workshop will be on June 23-24, 2026 from 11:00-5:00 pm Eastern Time. Early bird registration closes at 5:00 pm on Monday, June 15 and includes special bonuses: $100 off registration; signed copy of Natalie's book How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Guide for Human Resource Professionals; the Supplemental Toolkit with quizzes, sample policies and documentation, and investigative interview question templates, and an RPC canvas tote "swag bag." Additionally, you will receive a Certificate of Training indicating you have attended a 10-contact hour SHRM and HRCI approved program, a spiral-bound training workbook, and Certified Workplace Investigator digital badge that you can use on your Linkedin and social media. Note: this will be Natalie’s only virtual 2-day workshop this summer so register today to take advantage of these special bonuses!

June 12, 2026Episode 6912 min

Weingarten Rights 101: What Every Investigator and Union Steward Should Know

Episode Overview: In this first episode of the mini-series, host Natalie Ivey explains what Weingarten Rights are and the importance of internal investigators, especially HR and Employee Relations investigators, in understanding these rights. She further elaborates on common misconceptions, mistakes that are made, and how to handle a situation with a newly elected union steward who pushes the boundaries of the role so the investigatory interview can get back on track. Key Topics Origins of Weingarten rights When rights attach Duties of management Responsibilities of union representatives Common misconceptions Key Lessons from This Episode: ✓ Representation is active, not passive. ✓ Employees must request representation. ✓ Investigators maintain control of the interview. Who Should Listen: HR and Employee Relations professionals, investigators, and managers responsible for internal investigations or compliance. Get Trained by Natalie on how to conduct investigations: Natalie’s next 2-day Certificate Program virtual workshop to gain the skills, tools, and confidence to handle any investigation effectively—before a costly mistake happens. The next virtual program will be on June 23-24, 2026 from 11:00-5:00 Eastern Time. (Please note in today's episode Natalie mentioned it ended at 4:00, but the program concludes each day at 5:00 pm ET). Early Bird registration is still open until end of business day Monday, June 15 so take advantage of the early-bird bonuses!

May 4, 2026Episode 6810 min

The Cost of Missteps – When Investigations Go Wrong

Episode Overview: In this first episode of the mini-series When HR Gets It Wrong: Risk, Reputation, and Recovery, we explore one of the most common—and costly—mistakes HR professionals make: mishandling investigations. Closing cases quickly may feel productive, but speed without accuracy can lead to serious legal and financial consequences. Natalie shares a real-world scenario from a manufacturing company where HR tried to resolve a harassment complaint quickly but failed to interview witnesses or document properly. The result? A lawsuit six months later with $250,000 in settlements, legal fees, and reputational damage. Key Lessons from This Episode: Speed is not accuracy: Quick case closures do not replace thorough investigations. Investigators who follow their instincts may be penalized for not meeting internal metrics—but diligence is essential. Documentation is your lifeline: Thorough, accurate notes protect both the organization and the investigator. AI tools can assist, but HR professionals must document interviews and investigative steps themselves. Training prevents missteps: Structured investigation training equips HR professionals with the skills to handle complex complaints defensibly and effectively. Case Highlight – SHRM Lawsuit: A former SHRM employee, Rehab Mohamed, sued the organization for racial discrimination and retaliation after raising internal concerns. Allegations focused on flaws in the HR investigation: limited investigator experience and pre-prepared termination paperwork before completing a proper investigation. A federal judge allowed the lawsuit to proceed, noting potential bias and deviations from best-practice investigative procedures. The case concluded with an $11.5 million verdict, underscoring the serious consequences of mishandled investigations. Why This Matters: This episode illustrates that even experienced HR teams can face significant legal and financial risks when investigations are not conducted impartially, thoroughly, and by appropriately trained professionals. Who Should Listen: HR and Employee Relations professionals, investigators, and managers responsible for internal investigations or compliance. Ensure your investigations are thorough, defensible, and strategic. Attend Natalie’s 2-day virtual certification workshop to gain the skills, tools, and confidence to handle any investigation effectively—before a costly mistake happens.

April 27, 2026Episode 6732 min

From Vanity Metrics to Board-Level Impact: The Trust & Risk Shift

Episode Overview In this episode, Natalie is joined by Deb Muller, CEO of HR Acuity, to explore how HR leaders can shift from outdated “vanity metrics” to meaningful data that demonstrates true business impact. Together, they unpack the concept of the Trust & Risk Statement™ and discuss how investigation teams can elevate their role from compliance-driven function to strategic risk advisors. This episode is essential for HR professionals who want to bring stronger, more credible insights to executive leadership and the boardroom. Key Topics Discussed 1. The Problem with Vanity Metrics Why speed and case volume don’t reflect investigative effectiveness How focusing on quick closures can damage workplace culture What executives actually want to hear from HR 2. Issue-to-Case Ratios = Investigative Rigor What issue-to-case ratios are and why they matter How they reveal depth, thoroughness, and pattern recognition Red flags that signal weak investigations Simple ways to start tracking this metric now 3. Anonymous Reporting & Psychological Safety Why low anonymous reporting is a warning sign — not a success metric What healthy reporting behavior looks like How to reframe reporting data to demonstrate employee trust 4. Aftercare Metrics & Protecting the Bottom Line What “aftercare” means in workplace investigations Why retaliation tracking is critical to organizational risk How post-complaint attrition signals deeper issues Connecting investigation outcomes to financial protection 5. The Trust & Risk Statement™ What it is and how it reframes investigation data How it shifts conversations with the C-suite Practical steps to begin crafting your own Key Takeaway Workplace investigations are not just about resolving complaints — they are a powerful source of enterprise risk intelligence. The right metrics don’t just track activity; they tell a story about trust, culture, and financial exposure. Who Should Listen HR leaders and business partners Employee relations professionals Workplace investigators Compliance and risk leaders Anyone looking to elevate HR’s strategic impact Resources & Next Steps If you’re ready to elevate your investigative skills and become a trusted risk advisor, register for Natalie’s HRCI & SHRM approved (10 credits) certification workshop: How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Workshop for HR Professionals. For more information and to register go to: 2-day virtual investigations workshop If you found this episode valuable: Subscribe to the podcast Share it with a colleague Leave a review to help more HR professionals elevate their impact

April 20, 2026Episode 6613 min

Interviewing Complainants, Witnesses, and the Subject: Techniques That Get to the Truth

Episode Summary: In this episode, we break down the art and science of investigation interviews. Topics include: Structuring interviews for complainants, witnesses, and the accused Using open-ended questions and avoiding leading questions Assessing credibility indicators Documenting interviews accurately Sample interview questions to guide your discussions Key Takeaways: Begin broad, then narrow to specifics. Let silence work—it often prompts additional details. Ask witnesses what they observed, not what they think. Avoid leading questions to prevent bias. Thorough, objective documentation is essential. Resources & Links: 2-Day How to Conduct Internal Investigations Workshop: June 23–24, 11 AM – 5 PM ETEarly-bird perks: Author-signed book Supplemental Toolkit RPC Canvas Tote “Swag Bag" $100 off Registration Certified HR Investigator Badge 10% group discount for 3+ attendees Register Here Natalie Ivey, MBA, SPHR, SHRM-SCP Founder & CEO RPC Human Resources 1616 Concierge Boulevard 1st Floor Daytona Beach, FL 32117 Office: (800) 517-7129 Ext. 700 Natalie@rpchr.com rpchr.com

April 6, 2026Episode 659 min

When Complaints Follow Accountability: The Weaponization of Workplace Investigations

In this episode, we explore a tricky and sensitive area of Employee Relations: when complaints appear immediately after performance management or discipline. Sometimes employees file complaints not because of genuine misconduct, but as a defensive reaction to accountability. This episode dives into why it happens, how HR can respond objectively, and strategies to identify patterns while staying neutral. What You’ll Learn in This Episode: Why some employees file complaints right after receiving a performance warning or disciplinary action. Common triggers that lead to defensive complaints, including PIPs, denied promotions, schedule changes, or termination risk. HR’s role in evaluating complaints objectively, focusing on evidence, timelines, corroboration, and documentation. How timeline analysis can reveal patterns and help HR navigate these situations. Best practices for handling complaints in a neutral, structured way, and policies to address bad faith or fraudulent complaints. Real-world insights from cases where performance feedback was unfair, and employees filed legitimate complaints afterward. Key Takeaways: Even if a complaint seems retaliatory, it must be assessed without bias. Timeline analysis is one of HR’s most powerful tools in understanding the context of complaints. A policy against bad faith complaints is essential—but actions must be supported by strong evidence to avoid retaliation risk. HR professionals must remain neutral and let facts guide investigations, even when complaints follow disciplinary actions. Resources & Upcoming Events: 2-Day How to Conduct Internal Investigations Workshop: June 23-24, 11 AM – 5 PM ET Early-bird perks include: Author-signed book Supplemental Toolkit with templates and tools $100 off regular registration Certified HR Investigator badge Canvas tote bag with RPC Human Resources swag 10% group discount for 3+ attendees Register Here Natalie Ivey, MBA, SPHR, SHRM-SCP Founder & CEO RPC Human Resources 1616 Concierge Boulevard 1st Floor Daytona Beach, FL 32117 Office: (800) 517-7129 Ext. 700

March 23, 2026Episode 6415 min

When Complaints Hit Your Desk: The First 24 Hours of an Employee Relations Investigation

In this episode, we explore what happens when complaints appear immediately after performance feedback or disciplinary action. Learn why employees sometimes use complaints defensively, how HR can objectively evaluate these situations, and the importance of timeline analysis and structured investigations. We also cover best practices for handling potential bad-faith complaints while staying neutral and fact-focused. Show Notes Key Topics The investigation intake process Maintaining neutrality in early complaint handling Proper documentation practices Determining whether a complaint warrants investigation Key Takeaways ✔ The first 24 hours set the tone for the entire investigation ✔ Intake is about fact gathering, not judgment ✔ Avoid statements that appear to side with either party ✔ Document complaints in a centralized system Resources & Upcoming Events: 2-Day How to Conduct Internal Investigations Certification Workshop: April 8-9, 11 AM – 5 PM ET Early-bird perks include: Author-signed book Supplemental Toolkit with templates and tools $100 off regular registration Certified HR Investigator badge Canvas tote bag with RPC Human Resources swag 10% group discount for 3+ attendees Register Here Subscribe & Connect If you found this episode helpful, be sure to subscribe, rate, and share The HR Investigations Podcast with a colleague who handles employee relations or investigations. New episodes drop regularly with practical guidance for HR professionals navigating complex workplace issues.

March 2, 2026Episode 6311 min

FMLA Violations: How Good Intentions Turn Into Federal Investigations

Episode Description: FMLA complaints rarely begin with bad intent—but they often end in costly investigations. In this episode, we explore how FMLA investigations actually start, the most common employer mistakes investigators see, real-world hypotheticals that show how cases unravel, and practical steps employers can take to reduce risk. Key Topics Covered: How employees raise FMLA violations Interference vs. retaliation claims Investigator red flags and common employer mistakes How to conduct an internal FMLA investigation Practical compliance and prevention tips Ideal Audience: HR professionals In-house counsel Business owners and executives Anyone responsible for leave administration Resources Upcoming Virtual Workshop: How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Workshop for HR Professionals April 8-9, 2026 11:00 AM – 5:00 PM ET Live, 2-day virtual format This hands-on workshop is designed for HR professionals who want practical tools—not theory. We cover intake, planning, interviews, documentation, credibility assessments, and investigation findings, with real-world scenarios throughout. If you’re responsible for handling internal investigations—or advising leaders on discipline and terminations—this is exactly the type of issue we work through in my upcoming two-day virtual investigations workshop, How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Workshop for HR Professionals, happening April 8-9, 2026, from 11:00 to 5:00 ET. Register early to take advantage of Premier Access Pricing and save $100 of the regular registration fee and get a complimentary author-signed copy of Natalie's book How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Guide for Human Resource Professionals and the comprehensive Supplementary Toolkit containing section quizzes, interview templates, sample witness statements, a sample investigation report, sample policies, and more. Register Here We focus on real situations and how to investigate them in a way that holds up under scrutiny. And if you’re looking for a practical reference you can keep on your desk, my book, How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Guide for Human Resource Professionals, is available on Amazon and walks you through the investigation process step by step. Subscribe & Connect If you found this episode helpful, be sure to subscribe, rate, and share The HR Investigations Podcast with a colleague who handles employee relations or investigations. New episodes drop regularly with practical guidance for HR professionals navigating complex workplace issues.

February 9, 2026Episode 6216 min

Documentation That Holds Up Under Scrutiny

The HR Investigations Podcast Episode Summary Bad documentation can destroy even the strongest investigation outcome. In this episode, we explore why documentation is the backbone of any HR investigation and exactly what makes attendance and discipline records defensible under scrutiny—from EEOC investigations to court depositions. We break down best practices, common credibility killers, real-world examples of good vs. bad documentation, and coaching tips to help managers and investigators get it right every time. Key Takeaways Documentation isn’t supplemental—it is the case. Good documentation is timely, factual, objective, specific, and consistent. Avoid subjective language (“lazy,” “bad attitude,” “always,” “never”)—it signals bias and invites legal risk. Write every note as if a third party (judge, investigator, or opposing counsel) will read it without any context. Timeliness matters: Document within 24 hours to avoid claims of retaliation or pretext. Include the employee’s explanation, policy references, and next steps to demonstrate fairness. Episode Highlights & Examples What Good Documentation Looks Like Use concrete, observable facts: dates, times, locations, exact behaviors, witnesses, and outcomes. Structure notes with the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result). Strong Example – Attendance Issue“On January 15, 2026, John arrived at 9:45 AM (scheduled start: 8:00 AM), without prior notification. This is the third unexcused late arrival in the past two weeks (previous dates: January 3 and January 10). I met with John at 10:00 AM. He stated traffic was heavy. I reminded him of the attendance policy (reviewed in onboarding on [date]) and offered flexible start time coaching if needed. Next occurrence may result in formal discipline.” What Ruins Credibility Subjective/judgmental words: “lazy,” “insubordinate,” “bad attitude,” “not a team player.” Exaggerations: “always late,” “never completes work.” Late write-ups: Writing notes weeks or months later looks like pretext. Emotional or inflammatory language: “This is unacceptable behavior,” “You should know better.” Weak Example – Performance Issue“Sarah has a terrible attitude and is always slacking off. She’s lazy and doesn’t care about the team.” → This version is pure opinion and would immediately raise red flags in any investigation. Writing for a Third Party Ask yourself: Does this note stand alone? Would it survive EEOC review or deposition? Strong Discipline Example – Safety Violation“On February 5, 2026, at 2:30 PM in the warehouse, Employee Tyra Simpson was observed not wearing required PPE (hard hat and safety glasses) while operating forklift, per company safety policy (Section 4.2, trained on [date]). Witness: Supervisor Sarah Herman. I spoke with Employee Tyra at 3:00 PM; they acknowledged forgetting. I provided refresher training and issued verbal warning. Further violations will result in written warning or suspension.” Coaching Tips for Managers & Investigators Document the same day—ideally within 24 hours. Use this checklist before finalizing notes: Is it timely? Are all facts verifiable (dates, witnesses, documents)? Have I avoided opinions, absolutes, or emotional language? Did I include the employee’s side of the story? Does it reference the specific policy and outline clear next steps? Train teams to write as if the note will be read by someone who has never met the employee. Closing Thought If your documentation doesn’t clearly tell the story, someone else will—whether that’s an employee’s attorney, an EEOC investigator, or a judge. Bulletproof records protect your decisions, promote fairness, and help employees improve. Resources Book: How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Guide for Human Resource Professionals Available now on Amazon This book provides step-by-step guidance, real-world examples, and best practices for conducting defensible workplace investigations. Upcoming Virtual Workshop: How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Workshop for HR Professionals February 17–18 11:00 AM – 5:00 PM ET Live, 2-day virtual format This hands-on workshop is designed for HR professionals who want practical tools—not theory. We cover intake, planning, interviews, documentation, credibility assessments, and investigation findings, with real-world scenarios throughout. If you’re responsible for handling internal investigations—or advising leaders on discipline and terminations—this is exactly the type of issue we work through in my upcoming two-day virtual investigations workshop, How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Workshop for HR Professionals, happening February 17-18 from 11 to 5 Eastern. We focus on real situations and how to investigate them in a way that holds up under scrutiny. And if you’re looking for a practical reference you can keep on your desk, my book, How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Guide for Human Resource Professionals, is available on Amazon and walks you through the investigation process step by step. Subscribe & Connect If you found this episode helpful, be sure to subscribe, rate, and share The HR Investigations Podcast with a colleague who handles employee relations or investigations. New episodes drop regularly with practical guidance for HR professionals navigating complex workplace issues.

February 2, 2026Episode 6117 min

Call-in Policies, No Call/No Shows & Job Abandonment

Attendance policies don’t fail investigations—enforcement does. In this episode of The HR Investigations Podcast, we take a closer look at call-in policies, no-call/no-shows, and job abandonment—three areas where employers frequently get it wrong. Using real-world investigation examples, we unpack how inconsistent enforcement, undocumented exceptions, and policy shortcuts often become the focus of claims. If your attendance policy exists on paper but isn’t enforced consistently, this episode will help you identify red flags before they turn into liability. What You’ll Learn in This Episode Why call-in policies still matter from an investigation standpoint The critical difference between a no-call/no-show and job abandonment Common mistakes employers make when declaring job abandonment How inconsistent enforcement undermines otherwise solid policies Investigator red flags that signal enforcement—not policy—is the real issue What should happen instead to protect the organization Key Takeaways A no-call/no-show is a policy violation—not automatic job abandonment Job abandonment is a process, not a conclusion Texts and informal workarounds weaken enforceability Supervisor inconsistency creates favoritism and credibility risks Documentation and clarity are what make policies defensible Investigator Red Flags Discussed “It depends on the supervisor” Informal exceptions without documentation No outreach attempts before declaring abandonment Policies no one can explain or consistently apply Discipline decisions that vary by department or manager Resources Book: How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Guide for Human Resource Professionals Available now on Amazon This book provides step-by-step guidance, real-world examples, and best practices for conducting defensible workplace investigations. Upcoming Virtual Workshop: How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Workshop for HR Professionals February 17–18 11:00 AM – 5:00 PM ET Live, 2-day virtual format This hands-on workshop is designed for HR professionals who want practical tools—not theory. We cover intake, planning, interviews, documentation, credibility assessments, and investigation findings, with real-world scenarios throughout. If you’re responsible for handling internal investigations—or advising leaders on discipline and terminations—this is exactly the type of issue we work through in my upcoming two-day virtual investigations workshop, How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Workshop for HR Professionals, happening February 17-18 from 11 to 5 Eastern. We focus on real situations and how to investigate them in a way that holds up under scrutiny. And if you’re looking for a practical reference you can keep on your desk, my book, How to Conduct Internal Investigations: A Practical Guide for Human Resource Professionals, is available on Amazon and walks you through the investigation process step by step. Subscribe & Connect If you found this episode helpful, be sure to subscribe, rate, and share The HR Investigations Podcast with a colleague who handles employee relations or investigations. New episodes drop regularly with practical guidance for HR professionals navigating complex workplace issues.