Episode #104 - Can Claims Ever Be Truly Objective?
Send us Fan Mail Adjusters are expected to be objective, but is true objectivity even possible when every claim requires judgment? In this episode of The Art of Adjusting® Podcast , Bill and Chantal explore how confirmation bias, anchoring, and preconceived notions can influence claim investigations. They discuss the importance of distinguishing facts from inferences and opinions, challenging initial assumptions, and evaluating favorable and unfavorable evidence by the same standard. From police reports and witness statements to prior adjuster notes, even seemingly reliable information can influence how a claim is investigated. Can adjusters ever eliminate bias entirely? Perhaps not. But recognizing it, questioning assumptions, and remaining open to contradictory evidence can lead to fairer, more thorough investigations. The takeaway: A good investigation isn't about proving your initial theory right. It's about being willing to prove yourself wrong. After listening, you'll have practical ways to recognize your own biases, challenge the assumptions buried in your claim files, and make sure the evidence drives your conclusions—not the other way around. For more insights, you might consider a career in liability adjusting or if you're searching for reliable adjusting services, visit Auten Claims Management . To explore more about Chantal Roberts and her contributions to the industry, visit CMR Consulting . Promotions: Once Upon a Claim: Explore the magical world of claims adjusting through fairy tales. Get your copy now . The Art of Adjusting®: Master the art of claims adjusting with practical insights and expert advice. Purchase here .






