Changing Higher Ed

According to the Consortium for Analysis of Student Success through International Education (CASSIE), students who participate in study abroad programs are 6.2 percentage points more likely to graduate within four years and 3.8 percentage points more likely to graduate within six years compared to their non-study abroad peers. Additionally, these students tend to earn higher GPAs and accumulate more credit hours upon graduation. This University System of Georgia infographic shows these outcomes directly enhance institutional key performance indicators such as retention and persistence. In this episode of Changing Higher Ed® podcast, Dr. Drumm McNaughton interviews Dr. Scott Marshall, President and CEO of the Institute for Shipboard Education, about how Semester at Sea transforms students’ lives and enhances institutional outcomes through innovative study abroad programming. Why Semester at Sea is a Game-Changer Semester at Sea offers students the opportunity to visit up to 10 countries during a single semester while earning 12 to 15 college credits through a partnership with Colorado State University. The program is supported by 180 universities worldwide, attracting a diverse student body of 450 to 550 students per voyage. While onboard the ship, students engage in a robust academic curriculum and participate in a living-learning community. This unique environment fosters strong relationships among peers, faculty, and staff while encouraging deep reflection on cultural experiences gained at each port of call. The program creates a profound impact on students by integrating global learning, critical thinking, and community-building into a single, cohesive experience. Alumni frequently credit Semester at Sea with shaping their careers and life paths, emphasizing how the iterative process of experiencing different cultures followed by reflection can permanently transform mental models and worldviews. The Impact of Study Abroad on Institutional Success The importance of study abroad programs in improving institutional metrics is significant. Research shows that students who study abroad graduate faster, earn higher GPAs, and complete more credit hours than their peers. This results in improved retention rates and better long-term outcomes for universities. Semester at Sea’s unique model of comparative experiential learning sets it apart from traditional study abroad programs, making it an invaluable asset for institutions seeking to enhance student outcomes and global competencies. Semester at Sea Benefits for Universities As a “third-party provider” program, Semester at Sea allows universities to partner without the financial burden of running their own study abroad initiatives. While institutions may lose one semester’s worth of tuition from participating students, the long-term benefits—such as higher retention rates, faster graduation times, and increased alumni loyalty—far outweigh the costs. By investing in study abroad programs, institutions can position themselves as leaders in global education and prepare their students for the challenges of an interconnected world. Innovations for the Future of Study Abroad Programs and Semester at Sea Looking ahead, the program is exploring new ways to remain at the forefront of global education. Plans include creating an artificial intelligence (AI) floating lab, which would allow students to gain AI literacy while participating in the program’s transformative experiential learning model. Collaborating with corporate partners like Nvidia, this initiative aims to equip students with cutting-edge skills that are increasingly critical in today’s job market. The Case for Expanding Study Abroad Destinations While Europe remains a popular destination for study abroad, institutions are encouraged to expand their programs to include Asia, Africa, and other emerging economies. With three of the world’s top five economies located in Asia (Japan, China, and India), exposing students to these regions is essential for preparing them to succeed in a globalized workforce. Semester at Sea’s itineraries reflect this need by offering students a diverse range of cultural and economic contexts to explore. The Importance of Faculty Engagement Faculty play a crucial role in the success of Semester at Sea. Participating faculty members enhance the student experience and bring fresh perspectives and global insights back to their home campuses. This ripple effect benefits future cohorts and strengthens the institution’s academic community. Faculty on Semester at Sea voyages are carefully selected for their passion for teaching and ability to contribute to the program’s unique living-learning environment. What Makes Semester at Sea Unique? Much of the program’s success is attributed to its living-learning community, which fosters deep connections among students, faculty, and staff. Students live and learn together on a ship for 105 days, participating in high-impact practices such as global learning and common intellectual experiences. The program’s structure ensures that students develop intercultural competencies, adaptability, and critical thinking skills that are vital in today’s interconnected world. Three Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards Consider Study Abroad Offices as Revenue Supporters Reframe how study abroad offices are viewed—not as cost centers but as revenue enhancers. These programs drive institutional success by improving retention, graduation rates, and overall student outcomes. Invest in Study Abroad Programs Institutions should provide incentives for students to participate in study abroad, such as financial aid scaled to family contributions. These investments yield significant returns through better institutional KPIs and stronger alumni engagement. Encourage Expansion Beyond Europe Study abroad offices should prioritize robust, comparative programs outside Europe, focusing on emerging economies like Asia and Africa. This approach aligns with global trends and equips students for success in diverse cultural and economic contexts. Bonus Takeaway from Dr. McNaughton: Involve your faculty in study abroad programs. Faculty who participate in programs like Semester at Sea return with enriched perspectives that benefit students and strengthen institutional outcomes. Final Thoughts As higher education leaders face mounting challenges in student retention, persistence, and graduation rates, innovative programs like Semester at Sea offer an intriguing solution. The combination of experiential learning, cultural immersion, and academic rigor provides students with a transformative experience that shapes their futures and strengthens institutional performance. By investing in global education and expanding opportunities beyond traditional boundaries, institutions can prepare students to succeed in an interconnected world while achieving vital organizational objectives. Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/semester-at-sea-improves-student-outcomes-and-boosts-institutional-success/ #HigherEducation #StudyAbroad #SemesterAtSea About Our Podcast Guest Scott Marshall is the host of the As Unexpected Podcast and President and CEO of the Institute for Shipboard Education, which directs Semester at Sea, a leading study abroad program. His passion for global education began with a study abroad experience in Japan as an undergraduate. Marshall sailed with his family on Semester at Sea in Spring 2017, later joining the organization as Vice President of Academic Affairs and becoming President in 2020. Previously, he was a Professor of Management and Vice Provost at Portland State University, publishing over 40 works on management, marketing, and entrepreneurship while teaching strategy and international business. He earned a B.A. in Business Economics from Willamette University, an M.A. in International Affairs from George Washington University, and a Ph.D. in International Business from the University of Oregon. His career reflects a lifelong dedication to education, travel, and fostering cross-cultural understanding. About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc. A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.  

Higher Education Enrollment Decline 2024-2040: You Can’t Recruit Your Way Out of a Declining Market The enrollment cliff is no longer a distant threat—it’s here, and institutions must act decisively to adapt. In this episode of Changing Higher Ed, Dr. Drumm McNaughton hosts Bill Conley and Bob Massa of Enrollment Intelligence Now to explore the demographic shifts, financial realities, and strategic imperatives reshaping higher education. With over 80 years of combined experience from institutions including Johns Hopkins, Bucknell, Dickinson College, and Columbia University, these enrollment experts provide insights into the demographic and enrollment decline. The latest Western Interstate Commission on Higher Education (WICHE) report projects significant declines in high school graduates, signaling major challenges for higher education institutions. After peaking at 3.9 million graduates in 2025, numbers will decline to 3.6 million by 2030 and below 3.4 million by 2040—a 13% drop over 15 years. Five states (California, Illinois, Michigan, New York, and Pennsylvania) will account for over 75% of this nationwide decline. Key Demographic Shifts (2025-2040) White student population: 26% decrease (1.6M to 1.2M) Hispanic student population: 16% increase (940K to 1.1M) Black student population: 22% decrease Asian student population: 10% decrease Growing gender gap: 2025 projection shows 52% female vs. 42% male degree holders Market Segmentation Impact Elite/Selective Institutions (Minimal impact) Institutions with <15% admission rates and strong endowments Major public flagships remain stable Mid-Tier Institutions (Highest risk) Weakening admission rates High discount rates (60-70%) Particularly vulnerable in Midwest and Northeast Open Enrollment/Community Colleges Significant enrollment pressure Post-COVID challenges Overhead cost struggles Financial Reality Current average net price ($16,500/year) is actually lower than in 2006 ($19,000/year in 2024 dollars), but institutions struggle to effectively communicate this value proposition. Strategic Solutions Target 36 million adults without degrees Implement academic realignment and program prioritization Develop flexible scheduling and dual enrollment programs Consider three-year degree programs Focus on career outcomes and practical skill development Right-size operations to sustainable levels Make strategic cuts in personnel and programs Shift messaging beyond traditional "liberal arts" branding Three Takeaways for University Presidents, Boards, and Enrollment Executives Be Realistic: Recruitment alone cannot solve systemic enrollment declines. Institutions must analyze their unique situations and focus on actionable data. Leaders should localize their strategies to fit regional contexts, rather than relying on generalized solutions. "Don't think that you can recruit your way out of a declining market." Focus on Strengths: Differentiate your institution by leaning into what it does best. This involves identifying areas where your institution has a competitive advantage and leveraging them to stand out. Trim inefficiencies and focus resources on high-value programs and initiatives. Act Decisively and Proactively: Waiting to make necessary adjustments only exacerbates challenges. Institutions must take bold steps to ensure long-term sustainability, including program prioritization, exploring strategic partnerships, and right-sizing budgets and staffing levels. "Shrinking is going to be painful, but it's less painful than closing." As emphasized by Dr. McNaughton, citing Jack Welch: "If the rate of change outside your institution is greater than the rate of change inside, you're headed for the cliff." The demographic challenges are real and require immediate action, not hope for an unlikely turnaround. Read the podcast transcript: https://changinghighered.com/higher-ed-enrollment-crisis-strategic-solutions-expert-analysis/ #HigherEducation #HigherEdEnrollment #EnrollmentCliff  

Exploring Academic Censorship and Its Impact on Free Speech in Universities This episode of Changing Higher Ed® podcast features Dr. Jeremy Young of PEN America, discussing the organization's efforts to combat censorship in higher education. PEN America's "Freedom to Learn" program actively opposes state legislative attempts to restrict academic freedom and free speech on college campuses. The interview highlights concerning trends like "educational gag orders," "jawboning," and DEI bans in various states, emphasizing the threat these actions pose to intellectual discourse and institutional autonomy. Young advocates for universities to prioritize protecting free expression, even amidst political pressure, suggesting strategic approaches for presidents and boards to navigate these challenges. The discussion also covers PEN America's annual report, "America's Censored Classrooms 2024," which tracks these legislative trends. Podcast Overview PEN America's Mission and Background PEN America is a 100-year-old organization focused on defending the freedoms of writers, including academic freedom and freedom of expression. Originally stood for Poets, Essayists, and Novelists but now just "PEN" to be more inclusive of all writers. PEN International has over 140 PEN centers worldwide. PEN America's activities include awards, literary festivals, global writer protection, advocacy against book bans, free speech advocacy, and higher ed advocacy (Freedom to Learn program). PEN America is described as "center-left," maintaining relationships with organizations across the political spectrum. The Threat to Academic Freedom and Free Speech There's a growing movement to constrict the space of ideas available to students on college campuses. The argument often made is that universities lean left, and the solution is to limit existing voices, not to add more conservative perspectives. This trend manifests in attempts to ban courses, curricula, and harass administrators. The "solution to speech is more speech," and increased voices are beneficial. Book Banning and the Underlying Agenda Book banning often involves claims of obscenity but is ultimately an attempt to constrain ideas, not to protect children from inappropriate material. Analysis of banned books reveals they disproportionately feature minoritized identities, including LGBTQ, race, and sexual violence. Those who want to ban these books view them as encouraging those types of identities. PEN believes people need to see themselves reflected in books and that banning them is an attempt to cut off viewpoints for students. "America's Censored Classrooms 2024" Report An annual report tracking legislation that censors colleges and universities. Tracks "educational gag orders" that censor topics/ideas and restrictions on university autonomy (DEI offices, curriculum, accreditation standards, tenure, governance). Focuses on trends in proposed and passed legislation and predictions for the future. Jawboning as a Form of Censorship Jawboning refers to lawmakers threatening or bullying university presidents into actions they want without passing laws. This includes pressuring universities to close DEI offices or eliminate certain programs. It is a stealthy approach as there are no democratic elements, no hearings for public comment, and no laws in place to challenge. It creates a difficult situation for presidents who have limited leverage and no recourse. Congressional hearings on antisemitism have become another form of jawboning intended to intimidate university presidents and make political points. The goal often isn't to address the issue at hand but to exploit them for political gain. Florida as a Case Study in Censorship Florida is cited as "Armageddon for higher education." The state passed the "Stop Woke Act," which is a direct restriction of faculty speech. SB 266 banned DEI and placed significant restrictions on curriculum, causing numerous course eliminations. The University of North Florida removed its interfaith center due to thinking it was a DEI program. The governor replaced the board of New College of Florida with conservative figures who dramatically altered the curriculum and mission. PEN America has opened a permanent office in Florida to respond to these threats. DEI Bans in Higher Education and Their Impacts DEI bans result in the closing of cultural centers, women's centers, and multicultural centers. Staff are often reassigned or laid off in states that pass bans. Iowa has passed the most draconian ban, including a ban on developing any programming "with reference to race." It restricts universities from opining on 16 topics related to race, gender, and identity or any related topics. Universities can't even discuss bias, including the term. Extremist Attacks on Accreditors Project 2025 has a plan to weaponize accreditation, forcing accreditors to remove any reference to DEI. The government is threatening to censor ideas by forcing this change in standards. WASC considered preemptively removing DEI language but backed off after pushback. PEN America is not concerned with DEI standards themselves but with government censorship of those standards. The Impact of Censorship Laws It takes years to reverse censorship laws, even if they are ultimately deemed unconstitutional. Once laws are put into place, universities have to comply until they are challenged. This can lead to the loss of programs, funding, and staff for years. The "Stop Woke Act" was ruled on in four and a half months, which was exceptionally fast. Institutional Neutrality and University Leadership Presidents are scared, and there are laws banning them from commenting on anything. Institutional neutrality is a good principle, but the judgment of what concerns the university's mission must be made internally. The government is inserting its judgment over the judgment of the people who are running the institution. Academic freedom is not possible if the leaders are under the direct ideological thumb of the government. University Presidents' Responses and Strategies: Managing Laws and Defending Ideological Independence Many presidents are doing the wrong thing, unilaterally disarming by preemptively closing DEI programs. It is a strategy that is ineffective when they are dealing with a national campaign, not local lawmakers. Presidents should be prudent about public statements but strategically defend the university's ideological independence. They should embrace cooperation with lawmakers on non-ideological issues (budgets, safety, etc.), but not on controlling ideas. Presidents need to use their limited leverage to protect the independence of the university. Faculty's Role in Protecting Free Speech Universities sometimes fail to share their strategies with faculty and restrict the faculty from expressing viewpoints that could help the institution. Faculty can be more outspoken than institutions, and using the "I'm not speaking for the university" disclaimer can be helpful. Universities should not comment on current events unless they directly affect the institution. Universities should not silence alternative viewpoints. Leaders should avoid inserting themselves in debates where there is no role for them. Free Expression and Institutional Mission Universities must welcome all viewpoints to allow for robust debate. This allows the university to state whether a view aligns with the values of the institution. They must defend the right for all to speak, but they must be able to freely express their own views on the matter. There is no constitutional exception for hate speech, only incitement to violence. Champions of Higher Education PEN America has created the Champions of Higher Education, which is a group of over 300 former college presidents who speak out against these laws and attacks. It is important to protect all kinds of speech on campus, as well as to maintain a safe campus environment. Four Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards "Don't do the censors work for them." "Don't comply in advance." "Promote the values of free expression, no matter what is happening in the country." Train all members of the university community in how free expression works. Final Thoughts Dr. Young's insights highlight the serious and growing threats to academic freedom in the U.S. The interview reveals the complex strategies used by those attempting to censor higher education, the challenges faced by university leaders, and the importance of actively defending free expression. PEN America's work is presented as a crucial effort to protect the fundamental principles of higher education as a place for diverse viewpoints and robust debate. Read the transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/censorship-in-higher-education-a-pen-america-perspective/ #HigherEducation #Censorship #Project2025   About Our Guest Jeremy C. Young is the Freedom to Learn Program Director at PEN America, where he leads efforts to fight government censorship in higher education institutions. He directs PEN America’s work on educational gag orders, the Champions of Higher Education initiative, and an expanding network of coalitions to mobilize support for professors and teachers. A former history professor, Young holds a Ph.D. in U.S. history from Indiana University and is the author of The Age of Charisma: Leaders, Followers, and Emotions in American Society, 1870-1940 (Cambridge University Press, 2017).   About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc. A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.  

In this 7th annual end-of-year episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast, Dr. Drumm McNaughton becomes the guest of our podcast as we welcome this year's guest host, Tom Netting, of TEN Government Strategies, to review McNaughton's higher ed predictions for 2024 and explore his higher education 2025 predictions. The discussion reveals how higher education fared over the polarizing election year and what to expect in the coming year.  Review of 2024 Higher Ed Predictions and Outcomes Political Environment and Higher Education: Grade A The prediction about increased political involvement in higher education proved remarkably accurate in 2024, particularly given the election year dynamics. The sector experienced unprecedented political scrutiny, culminating in the October 7th congressional hearings that led to the departure of three university presidents. State-level political intervention was particularly evident in Florida, where more than a fifth of University of Florida professors failed post-tenure review under new requirements. A Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) survey of 6,000 faculty members across 55 colleges revealed that one in seven faculty members reported being disciplined or threatened with discipline due to their teaching, research, academic discussions, or off-campus speech. The election year amplified these tensions, with higher education becoming a focal point in political debates. 2024 Enrollment Challenges and Demographics: Grade A The prediction regarding enrollment challenges proved accurate, with institutions facing significant pressures: FAFSA rollout complications created unexpected enrollment barriers Regional institutions and private colleges were particularly affected Institutions under 1,000 students faced the greatest vulnerability Demographic realities showed concerning trends: from 3.4 million students in 2010 to 3.9 million by 2025, with a projected drop back to 3.4 million over the next 15 years. Institutional Closures and Market Consolidation: Grade A The closure rate accelerated dramatically, rising from 50 closures in 2022 to 80 in 2023. In 2024, 16 nonprofits closed, with Christian colleges representing half of these closures. The impact extended beyond campuses - Wells College's closure in Aurora affected the town's elementary school, water treatment plant, and community medical center. Academic realignment became crucial, exemplified by West Virginia University's cuts of 143 faculty positions and 28 programs and PASSHE's consolidation of six universities into two regional entities. As predicted, smaller private institutions became prime targets for acquisition: Institutions under 1,000 enrollment faced greatest pressure Those without strong endowments particularly vulnerable Early movers in seeking partnerships fared better than those waiting until financial crisis Market showing clear signs of mature-to-declining industry characteristics Technology and Artificial Intelligence Adoption: Grade A- The sector showed a clear divide in AI adoption approaches: Miami Dade College and Kogod Business School fully integrated AI across curricula Other institutions maintained strict opposition to AI-generated content Faculty concerns about AI replacing jobs emerged at institutions like University of Wisconsin Progressive institutions recognized AI's potential in enrollment management, student outcomes measurement, and program assessment Student Needs and Pandemic Recovery: A- Post-pandemic adaptation revealed mixed results: Successful intense tutoring programs demonstrated three to four months of focused support could gain students a year in academic progress Faculty resistance to changing traditional teaching methods remained stronger than anticipated Growing sense of student and faculty disengagement emerged Increased burden on faculty as informal student counselors Shift toward more transactional educational relationships Higher Education 2025 Predictions Legislative and Regulatory Environment Higher Education Act Reform Partial reform through budget reconciliation rather than comprehensive overhaul Implementation of short-term Pell Grants with bipartisan support Department of Education reorganization likely but not dissolution Enhanced focus on workforce development while maintaining liberal arts values Regulatory Changes Significant modifications to existing regulations under new administration Major changes to accreditation oversight through legislation Evolution of NACIQI's role and authority Enhanced institutional accountability measures Challenges to regulatory authority through cases like Loper Bright Market Evolution and Institutional Viability Enrollment and Demographics One-time enrollment increase in early 2025 due to FAFSA resolution Subsequent decline as demographic cliff impacts materialize Uncertainty in international student enrollment due to immigration policies Critical need for innovative recruitment strategies Expansion of direct admission programs Institutional Sustainability Accelerated pace of closures and mergers Increased pressure on institutions under 1,000 enrollment Four strategic options: acquire, sell, consolidate, or close Enhanced focus on mission-critical programs Need for proactive partnership exploration while financially viable Academic and Administrative Transformation Campus Climate and Governance Continued pressure on DEI initiatives with more institutions modifying policies Persistent free speech challenges requiring balanced approaches Enhanced board engagement beyond traditional meeting schedules Evolution of shared governance models Balance between oversight and operational support Technology Integration Required AI adoption across operations Integration of AI into teaching and administrative functions Need for systematic faculty development in technology Balance between innovation and academic integrity Enhanced focus on critical thinking in AI use Financial Sustainability Limited progress on broad student debt forgiveness Focus on program cost-benefit analysis Innovation in financial aid delivery Growing emphasis on affordability initiatives Enhanced scrutiny of return on investment Strategic Imperatives for Leadership Proactive Planning and Adaptation Institutions must: Develop comprehensive contingency plans for enrollment fluctuations Create distinctive value propositions Implement effective academic realignment strategies Balance workforce needs with educational mission Consider strategic partnerships before financial pressure becomes acute Governance and Leadership Evolution Boards must: Increase engagement frequency Maintain appropriate oversight without micromanagement Consider institutional sustainability options proactively Support presidents in navigating complex challenges Ensure alignment between mission and market realities Focus on student success and community impact Wrapping Up McNaughton's 2025 Higher Ed Predictions The higher education landscape stands at a critical juncture where decisions made in 2025 will determine institutional trajectories for years to come. Success requires balancing traditional academic values with market realities while maintaining focus on student success and institutional sustainability. The sector must embrace transformation while preserving core educational missions, requiring unprecedented levels of strategic thinking and proactive leadership. The demographic cliff, political challenges, technological change, and market evolution demand a new approach to higher education leadership. Institutions that survive and thrive will be those that can adapt to changing conditions while preserving their essential character and mission. The time for proactive strategic planning and decisive action is now, before external pressures force reactive responses. Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/higher-education-2025-predictions-2024-year-in-review/ #Highereducation #2025HigherEdPredictions #HigherEducationPodcast About Our Podcast Guest Host Tom Netting Having spent all of his professional career devoted to higher education policy oversight and implementation, Tom Netting has an extensive knowledge of the laws and regulations governing all aspects of higher education. His considerable background and experience have afforded him the opportunity to view the development and implementation of federal higher education and workforce development policy in their entirety – including issues related to higher education and workforce development, health care, veteran affairs policies, and the procurement of federal appropriations. About the Co-Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc. A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.

Consolidating Higher Education: The Community Solution Model This episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast features Dr. Michael Horowitz, Chancellor of The Community Solution Education System (formerly TCS Education System), who discusses using innovative models for higher education consolidation as an additional category in or alternative to traditional mergers or acquisitions. Horowitz highlights the system's unique approach, a collaborative model prioritizing resource optimization and expertise sharing among member institutions while maintaining individual identities. The conversation addresses challenges facing higher education, including increasing closure rates and the importance of proactive strategies like mergers, acquisitions, and consolidations. Both McNaughton and Horowitz emphasize the necessity of early planning and shared vision, particularly involving faculty, for successful integration. They also touch on broader trends and challenges in higher education, such as increasing closures and the challenges boards face in adapting to the uniqueness of the business of higher education. They conclude with practical advice for institutions considering consolidation, focusing on partnership development, early financial assessment, and resource amplification to strengthen academic missions.   Key Discussion Points   The Community Solution Model: A Collaborative System Alternative to Traditional M&A: The Community Solution operates as a "system" where institutions collaborate rather than compete. This approach aims to optimize resources, share expertise, and improve student success. Quote: "The consolidation that operates as a system in which its institutions collaborate instead of competing, gain resources, share expertise, and optimize expenditures in the process." – Michael Horowitz System Integration: The system model integrates non-student facing operations like finance, technology, and marketing. This allows individual institutions to focus on academic endeavors. Quote: "All of that can be scaled. To better quality, for the same dollar... The uniqueness has to drive through the academics."– Michael Horowitz Maintaining Institutional Identity: Each college within the system retains its own accreditation, president, board, leadership, assets, and liabilities. The system consolidates operations, not the institutions themselves. Quote: "…each of our colleges keeps its own accreditation, president, board, leadership, their own assets and liabilities." – Michael Horowitz Trends in Higher Education and the Need for Consolidation Increasing Closures: The concerning trend of college closures, which have a significant negative impact on students and communities. Clayton Christensen's prediction of closures is revisited and said to be possibly understated. Quote: " The closure rate is accelerating. Last year there were 80 closures total, including 16 nonprofits." – Drumm McNaughton Mature and Declining Market: The higher education market is described as mature with overcapacity and declining student populations. The need for a new strategy to remain viable is clear. Boards Waiting Too Long: Many college boards are hesitant to act proactively and address financial or enrollment trends until it is too late. Relying on 'hope' is not an effective strategy. AI Prediction: AI models could accurately predict most college closures based on historical data, showing that many of these closures are foreseeable. The Benefits of a System Approach Resource Amplification: Consolidation of back-end services leads to cost savings that can be reinvested into academic programs. The system aims to "amplify" resources, not just save money. Scalability and Efficiency: Shared resources and centralized functions create economies of scale and improve overall efficiency. Shared Talent and Ideas: The system fosters collaboration and the sharing of best practices among institutions and staff, resulting in shared knowledge. Quote: "...we're amplifying our brain power by coming together." –  Michael Horowitz Enhanced Faculty and Student Resources: The system provides faculty with resources like teaching and learning support and global engagement programs. Implementation and Integration Challenges Regulatory Process: Post-merger integration involves navigating a complex regulatory process that requires meticulous planning and execution and can take an extended amount of time. Project Management: Successful integration requires strong project management skills to coordinate the various tasks and stages. “The most valuable person that you have on your post-merger integration team is your project manager." – Dr. Drumm McNaughton. Faculty Buy-In: Obtaining faculty support and ensuring clear communication are crucial for a successful transition. Timeline: The process from initial discussion to full integration can be lengthy and can take up to three years. Consolidation Governance Structure Dual Board Structure: Each college retains its own board, which is deeply involved with the day-to-day operations, while a system board oversees the overall system mission, risk, and financial health. System Board Role: The system board provides guidance and support but does not interfere with the day-to-day operations of the colleges. This board looks at how the system works together. Shared Governance: Overlap between the two board structures allows for a shared understanding of institutional goals and needs. Future Plans at The Community Solution (TCS) New Facility in Chicago: The Community Solution is consolidating its system office and Chicago school into a new facility to increase collaboration and efficiency. This includes plans for a second medical school. Canadian Recruitment: The system is planning to establish a presence in Vancouver, Canada, to recruit more international students without needing to create duplicative offices. Global Perspective: The system sees the importance of global education and perspective in higher ed. Three Takeaways for Institution Presidents and Boards Considering Consolidation Seek Partnerships: Proactively explore potential collaborations with other colleges, universities, or community entities. Act Early & Study Financials: Have these conversations early, don't wait until urgency arises, and be very aware of financial and enrollment trends. Amplify Resources: Focus on amplifying resources through collaboration to strengthen both the academic mission and community impact. Wrapping Up This podcast provides valuable insights into an alternative model for higher education consolidation that prioritizes collaboration, resource optimization, and the preservation of institutional identity. The Community Solution's approach serves as an example for other institutions facing challenges in a changing higher education landscape. The conversation highlights the necessity of proactive decision-making and strategic planning. Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/new-models-for-consolidation-in-higher-education/ #HigherEducation #HigherEducationConsolidation #HigherEducationPodcast   About Our Podcast Guest Michael Horowitz, Ph.D., is the founder and president of The Community Solution Education System, an integrated, nonprofit system of six colleges and universities that work collaboratively to increase student success and enhance community impact. Prior to founding The Community Solution, he served as president of The Chicago School for nearly a decade. Dr. Horowitz has more than 30 years of experience in higher education roles that include faculty member, program director, and dean. He holds a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from Northwestern University and a B.A. in Psychology from Columbia University. Connect with Michael Horowitz on LinkedIn →   About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc. A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.

Higher Education Policy in the 119th Congress Part 2 of this podcast continues with Tom Netting, president of TEN Government Strategies and our Washington Update expert, examining ways in which the outcome of the 2024 US elections will transform higher education. Drawing from over three decades of policy expertise, Netting provides an insider’s perspective on the anticipated changes a Trump administration and the 119th Republican-controlled Congress could bring to higher education. Netting analyzes shifts in key Congressional committees, focusing on the implications for higher education funding, accreditation, and the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. He also addresses the impact of potential regulatory changes, executive orders, and court decisions on issues such as student loan repayment and Title IX. Finally, he offers advice to higher education institutions on preparing for these upcoming changes. Higher Education Policy in the 119th Congress: 2024-2025 Impact Analysis Tom Netting, president of TEN Government Strategies and Washington Update expert, provides crucial insights into how the 2024 US elections will transform higher education. Drawing from over three decades of policy expertise, Netting offers an insider’s perspective on the anticipated changes under a Trump administration and Republican-controlled 119th Congress, exploring implications for institutions, students, and education policy. Congressional Leadership Transformation and Committee Impact Critical Committee Changes Reshaping Education Policy &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration: none; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: start;"> Senate HELP Committee leadership transition to Bill Cassidy (R-LA) from Bernie Sanders (D-VT), signaling a potential pivot toward healthcare-focused policy and reformed higher education priorities. House Education and Workforce Committee leadership race between Joe Wilson (R-SC), Tim Wahlberg (R-MI), and Burgess Owens (R-UT), following Virginia Foxx’s retirement, with implications for education policy direction. Significant Appropriations Committee turnover affecting crucial decisions on: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> Pell Grant funding allocations Student loan program resources Financial aid program sustainability Institution support mechanisms Regulatory Transformation Immediate Regulatory Changes and Their Institutional Impact &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration: none; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: start;"> Comprehensive revision of existing regulations: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> Borrower defense mechanisms and institutional accountability Updated gainful employment metrics affecting program viability Modified 90/10 rule implementation for proprietary institutions Reformed institutional quality standards Status of proposed rules and NPRMs: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> Student borrower relief programs Program Integrity and Institutional Quality guidelines TRIO program modifications Distance education requirements Return to Title IV (R2T4) calculations Delayed or abandoned 2025 initiatives: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> Cash management reforms Accreditation standard updates State authorization requirements Executive Action Implications &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration: none; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: start;"> Immigration policy changes affecting: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> International student enrollment Institutional revenue streams Campus diversity initiatives Title IX implementation challenges: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> 26 states blocking new regulations 24 states implementing changes Institutional compliance complexities Student loan repayment modifications: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> New repayment structure implementation Institutional reporting requirements Student success metrics Accreditation Evolution and Institutional Impact Fundamental Accreditation Reform &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration: none; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: start;"> Reexamination of accreditor core mission and scope Controversial DEI standards debate: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> Five of six former regional accreditors requiring DEI standards SACCOC’s contrasting approach Potential prohibition implications Academic freedom considerations: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> Faculty concerns about restricted discourse Institutional autonomy questions Cultural and political influence on standards Higher Education Act reauthorization implications: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> Potential solutions for accreditation challenges Updated oversight mechanisms Reformed quality assurance frameworks Liberal Arts Education Transformation Innovation and Adaptation in Liberal Education &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration: none; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: start;"> Strategic evolution of traditional programs: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> Career pathway integration Skills-based learning incorporation Industry alignment strategies Public service value recognition: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> Loan forgiveness program preservation Community impact assessment Social value metrics Educational delivery modernization: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> Hybrid learning models Virtual education integration Technology-enhanced instruction AI integration strategies: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent;"> Curriculum enhancement Administrative efficiency Student support systems Three Key Takeaways for Higher Education Leaders &]:mt-2 list-decimal space-y-2 pl-8" style= "box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration: none; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: start;"> Stay tuned for leadership changes. The new leadership will set the tone and tenor for upcoming policy changes, and a lot of the direction will come from the new President-Elect. Be prepared for discussions around accreditation and outcomes. There will be considerable discussion around accreditation and outcomes, as well as how the return on investment for all of education is assessed. Institutions should prepare to discuss outcome measures and how to demonstrate their return on investment, regardless of what type of institution they are. Be aware of the upcoming student loan repayment process. All of Congress is aware that student loan repayments are going to become due, and the process that is undertaken by both Congress and the new incoming administration will be a major topic of discussion in 2025. #HigherEducation #HigherEdPolicy #WashingtonUpdate Read the transcript on our website at  https://changinghighered.com/washington-update-implications-of-2024-elections-on-higher-ed-part-2/ About Our Podcast Guest Tom Netting Having spent all of his professional career devoted to higher education policy oversight and implementation, Tom Netting has an extensive knowledge of the laws and regulations governing all aspects of higher education. His considerable background and experience have afforded him the opportunity to view the development and implementation of federal higher education and workforce development policy in their entirety – including issues related to higher education and workforce development, health care, veteran affairs policies, and the procurement of federal appropriations. About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc. A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.

Higher Education Expert Analysis of Anticipated Federal Policy Changes Under the Incoming Administration Part 1 of this two-part podcast welcomes back Tom Netting, president of TEN Government Strategies and our Washington Update expert, to examine how the 2024 US elections will transform higher education. Drawing from over three decades of policy expertise on The Hill, Netting provides an insider's perspective on the anticipated changes a Trump administration and Republican Congress could bring to higher education. The conversation unpacks major shifts within the Department of Education, from FAFSA modernization and Title IX overhaul to the future of student loan repayment. Netting addresses pressing questions about federal funding streams, potential departmental restructuring, and the impact of new IT security regulations. The discussion culminates in a penetrating analysis of how evolving ROI metrics could fundamentally alter higher education funding decisions. Overview What Higher Education Leaders Will Gain from Listening to This Podcast Higher Education Implications of the 2024 Election – Part 1 &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration: none; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: start;"> The incoming presidential administration is expected to bring significant changes to the Department of Education, moving much faster than it did in the previous administration. Key personnel appointments are being announced quickly and are comprised of a more seasoned team. Netting doesn’t believe the Department of Education will be abolished but expects significant changes in how it is run, particularly with Linda McMahon as the nominee for Secretary of Education. Her background suggests the Department will be run more like a business with an emphasis on fiscal responsibility. Higher education leaders should be prepared to embrace potential changes, some of which might be positive. For example, the administration is expected to address the challenges with the FAFSA form and the administration of student financial aid, issues that have led to a decline in applications. Federal Higher Education Reform: Key Policy Changes for 2025 Key areas of change within the Department of Education likely include: &]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration: none; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: start;"> Title IX: The current Title IX regulations are facing legal challenges, with 26 states blockading the regulations as put forward and 24 states trying to implement them in the new iteration, which is causing chaos for institutions. The new administration may revisit these regulations. Gainful Employment and Financial Value Transparency Regulations: All institutions, not just proprietary or those subject to loss of eligibility, are supposed to submit information on all of their student cohorts to the Department of Education by January 15th. These regulations, requiring institutions to submit data on student cohorts and completers lists, are facing scrutiny and potential revision under the new administration. Income-Contingent Based Repayment Plans: The administration will need to address the upcoming deadline for student loan repayments and may revise existing income-driven repayment plans. Netting succinctly explains the difference in opinion between Republicans and Democrats on student loan repayment.  Return on Investment (ROI) in Higher Education: The new administration is likely to focus on the ROI of higher education, potentially using a calculation similar to the one used for “exemplary institutions” under the previous administration. This could lead to an assessment of ROI across all sectors of higher education and influence funding decisions. The major difference, however, is that this new equation methodology recognizes a 10-year window, not a 3-year window of earnings potential.  Three Key Takeaways for Higher Education Leaders &]:mt-2 list-decimal space-y-2 pl-8" style= "box-sizing: border-box; margin-block: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration: none; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: start;"> Engage with Policymakers: Actively engaging with policymakers at both the state and federal levels. This involves understanding their priorities, building relationships, and advocating for policies that support higher education. Prioritize Cybersecurity: The increasing focus on cybersecurity, particularly the NIST 800-171 regulations, makes cybersecurity a top priority. This includes investing in necessary infrastructure and personnel to ensure compliance and protect sensitive data. Focus on Workforce Development: Place a high priority on workforce development and the need for higher education institutions to align their programs with the needs of the economy. This includes forging partnerships with businesses and industries to provide relevant training and ensure graduates are well-prepared for the workforce. Higher Education Policy Outlook 2025 Overall, it is recommended higher education anticipate a period of significant change under the new administration. Leaders should stay informed about policy developments, particularly those related to the issues listed above, and be prepared to adapt to a new regulatory environment. Join us next week for Part 2 of this Washington Update with Tom Netting on anticipated changes coming in 2025 with the new administration.  Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/washington-update-implications-of-the-2024-elections-on-higher-ed-part-1/ #HigherEducation #WashingtonUpdate #HigherEdPolicy About Our Podcast Guest Tom Netting Having spent all of his professional career devoted to higher education policy oversight and implementation, Tom Netting has an extensive knowledge of the laws and regulations governing all aspects of higher education. His considerable background and experience have afforded him the opportunity to view the development and implementation of federal higher education and workforce development policy in their entirety – including issues related to higher education and workforce development, health care, veteran affairs policies, and the procurement of federal appropriations. About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is the founder, CEO, and Principal Consultant at The Change Leader, Inc. A highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience, Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission.

Faculty Diversity: A Business Case for Higher Education Success When the PhD Project launched in 1994, you could count the number of diverse students at major business school recruiting events on one hand. Today, after 30 years of systemic change, the initiative has graduated over 1,700 faculty members of color with an extraordinary 90% completion rate – nearly double the national average for doctoral programs. Even more remarkable, 97% of these graduates stay in academia. But here’s what makes this story particularly compelling for university leaders: Research has shown that the presence of a diverse faculty is the second highest correlating factor (after state demographics) in attracting diverse students to universities. It’s not just about representation – it’s about institutional success and survival in an increasingly global economy. This episode of Changing Higher Ed® features Dr. Jeffrey Robinson, Graduate of the PhD Project, Interim Chancellor at Rutgers University, Newark, and Blane Ruschak, President of the PhD Project and Consultant with KPMG. The PhD Project is a 30-year-old initiative focused on increasing diversity in business school faculty. The podcast highlights the project’s impact on diversifying the talent pipeline by providing mentorship and support to underrepresented students pursuing PhDs in business. Robinson and Ruschak share their personal experiences and explain the project’s systemic approach to change, emphasizing the economic benefits of a diverse workforce alongside recruiting, retaining, and supporting diverse faculty. Key Discussion Points: The Origins and Mission of the PhD Project: Founded nearly 30 years ago to address the lack of diversity in business schools and the workforce. Aims to increase the number of underrepresented minority faculty in business schools, which in turn attracts more diverse students to the field. Driven by the recognition of a changing global business environment and the demand for a diverse workforce. How the PhD Project Works: Sponsors an annual conference for underrepresented minority students to learn about business PhD programs. Provides financial support, networking opportunities, and mentorship to students throughout their doctoral journey. Boasts a 90% completion rate for its participants, with 97% staying in academia. Continues to support graduates through developmental programs focused on teaching, research, and leadership. The Benefits of Faculty Diversity in Academia: Diverse faculty serve as role models for students, especially those from underrepresented backgrounds. They bring different lived experiences, perspectives, and connections to the classroom, enriching the learning environment for all students. Contributes to groundbreaking research and innovative solutions. The Economic Imperative for Diversity: Diverse workforces are better equipped to relate to a wider range of clients and customers. Companies benefit from the diverse perspectives and talents of their employees. The Role of Mentorship and Community: The PhD Project creates a strong support network for participants, helping them navigate the challenges of doctoral studies. Alumni continue to mentor and collaborate with each other, further strengthening the community. Challenges and Solutions in Diversity Recruitment: Retaining diverse faculty is crucial and requires universities to provide adequate support and protect them from excessive service demands. Universities must hold leaders accountable for diversity recruitment goals. Three Takeaways for University Presidents and Boards Invest in recruiting and retaining diverse faculty, recognizing the long-term benefits of attracting and educating a diverse student body. Provide necessary support and mentorship to diverse faculty, ensuring their success and protecting them from being overburdened with diversity-related tasks. Hold university leaders accountable for achieving diversity goals and creating an inclusive campus environment. Final Thoughts The PhD Project is a powerful example of how a focused effort can make a significant impact on diversifying higher education and the workforce. Its success lies in its comprehensive approach, which combines financial support, mentorship, and community building. Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/faculty-diversity-drives-enrollment-the-phd-project/ #HigherEducation #HigherEdPodcast #HigherEdDiversity     About Our Guests Dr. Jeffrey Robinson is an award-winning author and the Prudential Chair in Business at Rutgers Business School, currently serving as Interim Chancellor of Rutgers University – Newark following two years as Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost. His research focuses on the intersection of business and society, addressing community and economic development in urban areas in the United States and abroad. Through academic leadership and community-engaged scholarship, he has a direct impact on corporate workplaces, entrepreneurs, and economic development policy in New Jersey and beyond. He has conducted groundbreaking studies on African American women entrepreneurs, social innovation, and minority representation in technology entrepreneurship. His recent book “Black Faces in High Places,” co-authored with Dr. Randal Pinkett, won a Gold Medal Axiom Book Award. An accomplished scholar with five degrees spanning engineering, urban studies, and business, Dr. Robinson has delivered keynote speeches and presentations across six continents during his distinguished 25-year academic career. Connect with Jeffrey Robinson on LinkedIn →     Blane Ruschak serves as the President of The PhD Project, where he oversees the strategy and operations of The PhD Project, which is a program designed to create more diverse business leaders by supporting diverse professionals to get their PhD in business and become role models in the classroom, academic administration and academic leadership positions. He lives in Charleston, South Carolina, and works out of Montvale, New Jersey. Connect with Blane Ruschak on LinkedIn →   About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is Principal Consultant and CEO of The Change Leader, Inc.—a highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience. Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn →

The Declining Trend in Public Confidence Higher Education has a reputation crisis. Public confidence in higher education is declining dramatically. In 2015, a Gallup poll revealed that the vast majority of Americans expressed a great deal of confidence in higher education, with only 10% reporting little to no confidence. By 2024, public confidence shifted significantly: only about a third maintained a great deal of confidence, while a startling 33% now held little to no confidence. This mirrors a broader trend of declining trust in American institutions. Dr. Drumm McNaughton and Dr. Courtney Brown, Vice President of Impact and Planning for the Lumina Foundation, discuss the causes and solutions to declining public confidence in higher education. They also explore the evolving demographics of higher education students, with a significant portion being non-traditional learners balancing work, family, and education. Finally, the conversation proposes solutions, emphasizing the need for increased transparency, improved student support services, and a reevaluation of faculty roles to better meet the needs of today's students. Key Points Covered in This Podcast: Reasons for Declining Confidence in Higher Education The latest Lumina-Gallup study on public confidence in higher education identifies three primary drivers: Political bias: 41% of respondents lacking confidence cited concerns that colleges are too liberal, attempting to indoctrinate students. Lack of relevant skills: Over a third criticized higher education for failing to impart skills directly applicable to the workforce, leaving graduates struggling to find employment. Affordability: Just under 30% expressed concern about rising tuition costs and high debt levels.   Shifting Demographics and Needs Traditional student demographics no longer represent the majority. Over a third of students are over 25. Over half are students of color. 78% work, with a third employed full-time. 20% have dependents. 44% are financially independent. Solving the Higher Ed Confidence Crisis: A Call for Change Higher education institutions need to adapt to the changing demographics and address the concerns driving declining confidence and reputation while discerning temporary spin from the true concerns of students and the underlying issues. The Stop-Out Numbers Over 42 million Americans started college but, for various reasons, did not finish. This suggests systemic issues within higher education that need to be addressed to better serve students. Confidence Gap While 54% of Americans hold post-secondary credentials, 33% have little or no confidence in higher education. This suggests a disconnect between the perceived value of education and the experiences of many degree holders. Value and Transparency Despite the concerns, over 90% of respondents still believe that at least one post-secondary credential has value, but trust in the system’s ability to deliver is low. 75% believe a college degree is as important or more important today than it was 20 years ago. Transparency in costs and the career value of degrees is a high priority to restoring trust. There is a need for greater transparency regarding both the true cost of college and the career pathways associated with specific credentials. Workforce Alignment Public concerns about graduates lacking job-ready skills highlight the need for stronger connections between institutions and industries. Partnerships for internships, externships, and mentorships should be prioritized. Partisan Divide Republicans primarily cite political bias as the reason for their declining confidence, while Democrats focus on affordability. The Demographic Cliff The number of high school graduates is projected to decline sharply in 2025-26, forcing institutions to re-evaluate their business models and focus on attracting and serving adult learners. Key Takeaways for Higher Ed Presidents, Boards, and Executive Leaders Listen: Actively engage with current, former, and potential students to understand their needs and experiences. Adapt: Re-evaluate institutional structures, offerings, and support services to better serve today's diverse student population. Increase Transparency: Provide clear and accessible information about costs and career pathways. Rethink Faculty Roles: Value and reward teaching, mentorship, and community engagement alongside research. Embrace Partnerships: Collaborate with employers to offer relevant work-based learning opportunities and build stronger connections to local workforce needs. Final Thoughts The declining confidence in higher education presents a significant challenge, but it also creates an opportunity for transformation. By listening to student needs, adapting to evolving demographics, and prioritizing transparency and relevancy, institutions can rebuild trust and ensure that higher education remains a valuable pathway to opportunity for all. Last week's podcast with Sophie Nguyen and Kevin Carey with New America discussed their research on what Americans really think about higher ed, which looks at the public confidence and perception crisis from a different angle.  #HigherEducation #HigherEdPodcast #ValueOfHigherEd Read the transcript on our website: https://changinghighered.com/the-crisis-of-confidence-in-higher-education/   About Our Guest Dr. Courtney Brown is the Vice President of Strategic Impact and Planning at Lumina Foundation, the nation’s largest private foundation focused specifically on increasing Americans’ postsecondary success. As the Foundation’s chief data and research officer, Brown oversees the Foundation’s efforts in the areas of strategic planning, research, evaluation, data, and learning. She also leads Lumina’s international engagement efforts. Brown has decades of experience and is a frequent national speaker and writer on postsecondary data, evaluation, performance measurement, and strategic planning. Dr. Brown received her B.A. from James Madison University and M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of Virginia. Courtney Brown on LinkedIn → About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is Principal Consultant and CEO of The Change Leader, Inc.—a highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience. Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn →  

Despite media narratives of declining confidence in higher education, new survey data reveals 80% of Americans view college costs - not value - as the primary barrier to enrollment. While only 36% think higher education is "fine how it is," bipartisan support remains strong, with a majority of both Democrats and Republicans favoring increased government funding for affordability. On this episode of Changing Higher Ed® podcast, Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Kevin Carey, Vice President for Education and Work at New America, and Sophie Nguyen, Senior Policy Manager with the Higher Education team at New America, a nonpartisan think tank focused on social and technological issues, including education. The discussion centers around  New America’s annual “Varying Degrees” survey, which examines how Americans perceive higher education. Carey and Nguyen argue that, contrary to the media narrative, Americans have not actually lost faith in the value of higher education. They attribute the decline in enrollment not to a loss of confidence but rather to demographic shifts, the economic recession, and the unique nature of the pandemic. They also highlight the partisan divide in perspectives on higher education, noting that Republicans have become more skeptical of higher education than Democrats, likely due to a changing composition of the two parties' constituencies in terms of educational attainment. The conversation concludes with practical advice for college leaders on navigating these challenges, emphasizing the need for clear communication about the value of higher education, acknowledging student and parental concerns about affordability and career pathways, and continuing to advocate for higher education in the face of political and social shifts.   What Higher Ed Leaders Will Gain From This Podcast Here are some insights, facts, and trends you’ll hear discussed:   Americans do not hate higher education. While confidence in higher education as an institution is declining, this is consistent with declining American confidence in all institutions. Americans still largely believe in higher education.   Americans’ opinions on higher education have remained relatively stable over the years, even amidst significant events like the pandemic. This finding counters media narratives suggesting a dramatic shift in public opinion.   A majority of Republicans believe that the government should invest more money to make higher education more affordable. This suggests that there is a bipartisan consensus on investing in higher education.   There has been a partisan realignment around higher education, with Democrats increasingly becoming the party of education. This is likely due to an increase in the number of people with college degrees among Democrat voters.   The decline in college enrollment is mainly driven by demographic decline, not by a decline in demand for higher education.  The number of college-age people in America peaked in the late 2010s and has been declining since.   The pandemic recession did not lead to an increase in college enrollment as previous recessions have. This is because the pandemic recession was brief, and the economy quickly rebounded.   The labor market has been very strong for non-college graduates in the middle and lower parts of the wage scale. This may be a factor in the decline in college enrollment.   Many parents who say they do not want their children to get a four-year degree actually do want their children to go to college for job training. They may not realize that most job-related training in the United States happens at colleges.   Colleges need to communicate the value of a liberal arts education to students and parents.  Emphasize that a liberal arts education is not just about job training but also about developing critical thinking skills, exposure to diverse perspectives, and personal growth.   Colleges need to make a clear connection between a liberal arts education and career pathways.  Highlight how the skills and knowledge gained in a liberal arts education can be applied to various careers.   Cost remains a significant concern for a vast majority of Americans, serving as a major barrier to college enrollment. The survey demonstrates bipartisan agreement on this issue.   Colleges need to address the cost of higher education: This includes providing more financial aid, lowering tuition, and exploring alternative models of education, such as three-year degrees.   Three Key Takeaways for Presidents, Enrollment Executives, and Boards Communicate Education's Value Demonstrate the lifelong benefits of liberal education Make concrete connections between liberal education and career pathways Don't ignore students' desire for clear career outcomes Address Cost Concerns Acknowledge that cost is a significant concern for students Clearly communicate available financial options and solutions Help students understand ways to manage educational costs Embrace Public Support Americans maintain strong support for higher education The majority of both parties support increased government investment Demographics present challenges, but core support remains strong Institutions should acknowledge the need for change while maintaining confidence   Final Thoughts The survey responses suggest that higher education leaders must adapt to the real environment, not the selective representation filtered through political or media bias. They need to be aware of the partisan divide around higher education, the demographic decline, and the strong labor market for non-college graduates. They also need to be proactive in communicating the value of higher education to students and parents and in addressing the cost of higher education. Read the transcript on our website at https://changinghighered.com/what-americans-really-think-of-higher-ed-new-americas-varying-degrees-2024/ #VaryingDegrees2024 #HigherEducation #HigherEdPodcast About Our Podcast Guests Sophie Nguyen Sophie Nguyen is a senior policy manager with the higher education team at New America. Her work focuses on college completion and public opinion in higher education. Nguyen leads Varying Degrees, New America’s annual survey that looks into how Americans perceive important higher education issues regarding value, funding, and accountability. Nguyen also manages the Higher Ed Public Opinion Hub, an online repository of higher education surveys, and co-authors Public Insight, New America's monthly newsletter that provides analysis on survey findings. Her work on public opinion has been featured in the New York Times, NPR, Inside Higher Ed, Higher Ed Dive, and other news outlets. Nguyen joined the program after graduating from Mount Holyoke College, where she earned a bachelor's degree in economics. She later earned a master's degree in higher education administration from the George Washington University School of Education and Human Development. Sophie Nguyen on LinkedIn → Kevin Carey Kevin Carey is Vice President for Education and Work at New America, a Washington, DC-based think tank. He writes widely about higher education and other topics for publications, including the New York Times, Atlantic, Washington Post, Vox, Slate, Chronicle of Higher Education, Inside Higher Ed, Washington Monthly, and elsewhere. Kevin Carey on LinkedIn →   About the Host Dr. Drumm McNaughton is Principal Consultant and CEO of The Change Leader, Inc.—a highly sought-after higher education consultant with 20+ years of experience. Dr. McNaughton works with leadership, management, and boards of both U.S. and international institutions. His expertise spans key areas, including accreditation, governance, strategic planning, presidential onboarding, mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Dr. McNaughton’s approach combines a holistic methodology with a deep understanding of the contemporary and evolving challenges facing higher education institutions worldwide to ensure his clients succeed in their mission. Connect with Drumm McNaughton on LinkedIn →