
S9E5 Ethics of Portfolios
Continuing this season's theme of asking 'yeah, but who's it for ?', this week we explore some of the ethical considerations advisers have around investment portfolios. Leaving aside Jordan's regulation soapbox-upon-soapbox ranting around the annoyingly lazy and central role 'FUM' still has in advice businesses, he and Nathan cover: Paying DIY client's due respect for the portfolio they've built over time - even if it clashes with your own views on what's they 'should' have done. Why what a client 'wants' and what they 'need' can differ - and who's call it really is. How the combination of our need to be seen to be doing 'something', and our preference for complexity over valuable simplicity can lead to some bloated portfolios. Why overthinking about this stuff is part and parcel for advisers. You can now get CPD points for listening to two knuckleheads (and guests!) wax lyrical about financial advice for an hour at a time. CPD For this Episode: https://quiz.cpdcheck.com/CHAL-26102211-21360001 Nathan : advice@nathanfradley.com.au www.nathanfradley.com.au Jordan : jordan@planningsolo.com.au www.planningsolo.com.au LinkedIn : Challenge the Standard in Financial Advice (Podcast): Overview | LinkedIn The information contained in this podcast is general in nature and does not take into account your personal situation. You should consider whether the information is appropriate to your needs, and where appropriate, seek professional advice from a financial adviser. Jordan and Nathan are both authorised representatives of PlanningSolo Licensing, AFS Licence 526143. Thanks again to the team at CPD Check for letting us publish our episodes using their AI-CPD certifying engine. Check out Clayton's episode on the pod for more info.















