KatAnu Connect Podcast

Hosted by Kate Megaw

Business ManagementInterviews guests

Website RSS feed

Episodes

180

Latest episode

Jun 2026

Language

EN-US

About the show

Kate Megaw, Ryan Smith & Anu Smalley host a variety of discussions on Leadership & Agility!

Listen to episodes

60 recent

June 15, 2026Episode 17924 min

Stop the Whiplash: Why Constant Reprioritizing Is Quietly Killing Your Team

Everything is a fire. Everything is priority number one. And by tomorrow, the number one priority has changed again. Sound familiar?In this episode, Kate Megaw, Anu Smalley, and Ryan Smith dig into the challenge they hear at almost every client and leadership class: a real lack of prioritization. Not just inside the sprint, but across the whole organization, where teams get handed a brand new top priority every single day.When everything is important, nothing is important. Constant reprioritizing whipsaws teams, burns people out, and leaves a trail of half-finished work and rising tech debt. Jerry Weinberg's research found you can lose 20 to 40 percent of productivity every single time you switch context, so three projects can leave you down 60 to 80 percent.In this episode, we discuss:Why a lack of prioritization is really a sign that your stakeholders are not alignedThe real cost: burnout, rework, tech debt, lost innovation, and the context-switching taxWhy this is a leadership problem, not a team problem, and why the team always gets blamedUsing the sprint to hold the line and protect work the team has committed toEmergent requests as a better signal than velocity for how often the team gets interruptedMoSCoW for sorting the must-haves from the nice-to-havesThe 20/20 approach from Innovation Games for a truly ordered backlogThe impact-effort matrix for spotting quick wins and killing low-value workBuy-a-feature with stakeholders and a limited budgetThe wins on the board debate: put easy wins up first, or dig into why the big thing is bigEvery time someone says yes, it consumes time, money, and attention. Prioritization is the discipline of protecting all three.Referenced in this episode: Jerry Weinberg's research on the cost of context switching, the 20/20 prioritization method from Innovation Games, the MoSCoW method, and the Eisenhower impact-effort matrix.

June 8, 2026Episode 17832 min

Just Because AI Can, Doesn’t Mean It Should: The Human in the Loop and Why AI Transformations Fail

AI can generate an answer in seconds. The harder question is whether it is the right answer to the right question, and what you actually do with it.In this episode, Kate Megaw, Anu Smalley, and Ryan Smith dig into what “human in the loop” really means, and why so many AI transformations are failing. Forbes puts enterprise generative AI failure near 95%, and RAND says more than 80% of AI projects miss. The pattern echoes the early Agile years: chasing a shiny tool without knowing what problem it solves.AI sees the data. Humans see the story behind it. The human brings context, ethics, and judgment, and stays the ethical guardian who catches the hallucination and the answer that is right for the wrong reasons.In this episode, we discuss:The human algorithm - turning AI outputs into real outcomes through context, ethics, and judgmentWhy AI sees the data but only humans see the story behind itAnu’s five workflow principles for human-led AI, including protecting the retro and naming a human decision owner for every recommendationWhy so many AI transformations fail, and how it mirrors the early Agile yearsAI-enabled vs. AI-native organizations, and why native winsUsing AI as a tool versus trusting it to run the businessChoosing the right tool for the job instead of defaulting to one model for everythingThe ethical guardian role - catching not just what AI gets wrong, but what it gets right for the wrong reasonsKnowing when to trust AI, when to challenge it, and when to override it Just because AI can do something does not mean it should. That is where humans come in. We are not using AI to replace thinking. We are creating more space for higher quality thinking for the human in the loop.Referenced in this episode: the documentary How I Became an Apocalyptimist (Daniel Rohrer), the Conan O’Brien podcast on how tools change but the task doesn’t, the New York Times feature on Box adding AI roles, and the AI-native shift discussed at the Miro Canvas conference.

June 1, 2026Episode 17728 min

You Don't Have an Empowerment Problem. You Have an Ownership Problem.

Leaders say their teams are empowered. The teams won't make a decision. Somewhere between those two sentences sits the real problem.This episode tackles the gap between the rhetoric of empowerment and the reality of approval-bottlenecked, micromanaged teams. Kate is joined from the Scottish Highlands by Anu Smalley and Ryan Smith for an honest look at why so many "empowered" teams quietly wait to be told what to do, why leaders struggle to let go, and what it actually takes to design autonomy into the system instead of just declaring it.Most organizations don't have an accountability problem; they have an ownership problem. Without ownership, accountability is just a polite word for blame. This conversation is a working tour through what changes that — the system shifts, the trust mechanics, the working agreements, and the daily moves leaders can make to stop rescuing and start coaching.In this episode, we discuss:The three-legged stool of trust — clarity, capability, and visibility — and how to spot which leg is wobbly when you feel the urge to micromanageWhy the system around a team has to absorb the shift in power before autonomy can take holdOrder takers vs. artisans, and how organizations train people out of ownershipWorking agreements that make trust visible: blockers surfaced in 24 hours, no surprises at Sprint Review, no scope-switching mid-sprint, and done means doneDecision-making guardrails that replace approval queues, including the team empowered to spend up to $200 against the core valuesTracking emergent work as the real accountability gap leaders rarely look atThe Pomodoro escalation pattern — solo, pair, team, stop and reassess — that ends hero culture and 4am debugging sessionsWhy leadership's two pillars are clarity of purpose and competence, not managing the workThe shift from "I know the answer" to "How can I help you find the answer?" Hope is not a strategy for empowerment. The goal isn't less leadership. It's leadership that creates more leaders.Referenced in this episode: Turn the Ship Around! by L. David Marquette, the Pomodoro Technique, and our recent episode You Don't Have a Strategy Problem: You Have an Execution Problem (Ep. 172).

May 25, 2026Episode 17634 min

AI Stopped Being an Afterthought: Finding Calm in the Overwhelm and the Pivot Ahead

event. Kate and Anu just wrapped a wild month on the road, and the message from both conferences was loud and clear: AI is no longer a bolt-on, it's the operating system!Fresh off Global Scrum Gathering Vancouver and Canvas 26 (Miro's user conference in San Francisco), Kate Megaw and Anu Smalley sit down with Ryan Smith to unpack two completely different conferences that delivered the exact same wake-up call.Inside: the highs, the lows, the pages of notes, and the calm that came after the dust settled. From the 80/20 flip to why AI-native beats AI-bolted-on, to the pivot Kate and Anu are making in their own business, this is a real, honest field report from two events and two very different rooms.If you're feeling the overwhelm too, you're not alone. Hit play. Take a breath. Let's find the calm together.

May 18, 2026Episode 17529 min

Over-Talkers, Under-Talkers, and the Meetings Nobody Enjoys

Every team has them. The teammate who turns a one-word answer into a five-minute monologue. The developer who has not said a word in three retrospectives. The Product Owner who "adds context" to every user story before anyone gets a chance to read it. This episode is a high-energy, no-nonsense look at the over-talkers and under-talkers who quietly shape every meeting, and at the facilitation moves that turn a room of crickets and ramblers into a room of contributors. Expect a practical tour through the Explorer, Shopper, Vacationer, and Prisoner lens from Diana Larsen and Esther Derby's Agile Retrospectives, a fresh take on meeting personas like the Rambler, the Interrupter, the Silent Assassin, and the Ghost Participant, and a stack of techniques you can use this week:Sand timers in stand-ups. Parking lots that get used. Round-robin and popcorn share-outs. Intentionally crafted breakout rooms. Silent brainstorming. "Make space, take space" working agreements. And the most underused move of all, one-on-one coaching outside the meeting.The takeaway is simple and bracing. The goal of a great meeting is not equal talking time. The goal is meaningful contribution. Great facilitators do more than manage conversations. They create the conditions for better conversations to happen.

May 11, 2026Episode 17429 min

Drop the Framework Theater. Deliver the Work.

Organizations are still struggling to deliver what their customers want, when they want it, and the loudest question in delivery right now is whether agile and traditional project management are stronger together.Some Scrum practitioners are pursuing PMP certifications for the first time, traditional project managers are picking up the updated PMI-ACP, and the lines between Scrum Master and Project Manager have blurred in the marketplace. Both disciplines bring real strengths. Forward thinking leaders are leaning into the blend instead of defending a camp.Most organizations are not picking sides anymore. They are picking outcomes. The question is no longer "are we doing real Scrum" or "are we doing proper Project Management." The question is whether your teams are delivering value, learning fast, and treating their customers like the heroes of the story.In this episode, we discuss:Why "Technical Project Manager" and "Scrum Master" have quietly become the same role on most job boardsHow the updated PMI-ACP is bridging traditional project management and agile leadershipThe hybrid skills organizations are hungry forThe leadership move that changes everything, regardless of title or framework

May 4, 2026Episode 17327 min

Call It What You Want. Can You Deliver?

The framework wars are over, and the only question that still matters is whether the work is landing in your customers' hands.This episode dives into the great convergence of project management and agility. Job titles are blending, PMI is leaning hard into adaptive approaches, and the new PMBOK reads nothing like the tablet of stone we used to study. The lines between Scrum Master and Project Manager have blurred in the marketplace, and forward-thinking leaders are leaning into the blend instead of fighting it.Most organizations are not picking sides anymore; they are picking outcomes. The question is no longer "are we doing real Scrum" or "are we doing proper Project Management." The question is whether your teams are delivering value, learning fast, and treating their customers like the heroes of the story.In this episode, we discuss:Why "technical project manager" and "Scrum Master" have quietly become the same role on most job boardsHow PMI and Agile Alliance moved from rivals to partners, and what the new PMBOK signals about the futureThe Shuhari path of mastery, and why so many teams skip straight to “ri” without earning itThe better questions leaders should be asking instead of arguing about labels

April 27, 2026Episode 17225 min

You Don’t Have a Strategy Problem: You Have an Execution Problem

High-performing organizations don’t just plan better: They shorten the distance between decision, action, and learning.This episode closes out the deep dive into the Manifesto for Enterprise Agility. This week covers the three principles of execution: move authority to where value is created, deliver value frequently and make work visible, and sense early, learn quickly, and act with confidence.Most organizations don’t have a strategy problem; they have an execution problem. Work moves too slowly, stays invisible, and sits disconnected from the people best placed to decide what to do next. These three principles are the mechanics for fixing that.In this episode, we discuss:Why authority must travel with accountability if empowerment is going to be realUsing Management 3.0’s Delegation Poker to make decision rights explicitWhat ’making work visible’ really means beyond having a Jira boardWhy a Sprint Review should be a real show and tell, not a smoke-and-mirrors PowerPointHow sensing early shortens the gap between signal, decision, and actionWhy psychological safety, air cover, and a learning culture sit underneath all three principles

April 20, 2026Episode 17123 min

Org Design for Agility: Guardrails, Flexible Funding, and Building for Adaptability

Most organizations don't need more frameworks: they need fewer constraints.This episode continues the deep dive into the Manifesto for Enterprise Agility, this week tackling the three principles of organizational design. From guardrails vs. gatekeepers to funding teams over projects, we unpack why the way most organizations are structured is quietly killing their agility.In this episode, we discuss:Why empowering teams starts with replacing gatekeepers with guardrailsThe case for funding outcomes and value streams, not projectsWhy efficiency is the enemy of adaptability and what to focus on insteadDelegation Poker and other practical tools for shifting decision-making cultureWhy your org design will stop your agility before your methodology ever will

April 13, 2026Episode 17035 min

Purpose, Partners, and Technology: The Leadership Principles Behind Enterprise Agility

What separates truly agile organizations from those just going through the motions? It starts with leadership behavior, specifically, three principles from the Manifesto for Enterprise Agility that challenge leaders to think bigger than their org chart. In this episode, we unpack what it means to create real clarity of purpose, extend agility beyond your organizational boundaries, and put technology and distributed talent at the core of how your company creates value.Key takeaways from this episode:Clarity of purpose enables confident decision-making: when teams truly understand enterprise outcomes, they can adapt plans as conditions change without waiting for permissionEnterprise agility doesn't stop at your front door: in an increasingly interdependent value ecosystem, agility must extend to partners, vendors, and contractorsTechnology, data, and AI aren't support functions: they're core to how companies create value, make decisions, compete, and respond in a fast-changing environmentDistributed talent requires intentional equity: technology and inclusion practices must make remote and hybrid team members active participants, not observers on the outside looking inAgility isn't about moving faster: it's about removing what's actually slowing you downAsk yourself this week: Does your entire organization understand your purpose well enough to adapt with confidence when conditions change?