
15. Don't Play the Loser's Game
Why is beating the market so difficult, even for professional investors? Scott explores active vs. passive investing, the mathematics behind investment costs, what Canadian research tells us about fund performance, and why avoiding mistakes may be the better strategy for long-term retirement success. In this episode Simon Ramo's tennis research and Charles Ellis's "loser's game" Why active investors as a group can't beat the market after costs Canadian fund fees: 0.29% for passive vs. 1.28% for active SPIVA Canada: 98.8% of Canadian equity funds trailed the index over 10 years Survivorship bias, and the 47.1% of funds that closed or merged Luck versus skill in manager performance Jack Bogle and "Bogle's Folly" Scott's own path from selling active funds to evidence-based investing The goal isn't necessarily to beat the market. It's to build a portfolio that helps you achieve financial freedom and pursue what matters most to you. Research and resources mentioned SPIVA Canada Scorecard, Year-End 2025 , S&P Dow Jones Indices The Passive vs. Active Fund Monitor, Year-End 2025 , Raymond Kerzérho, PWL Capital The Arithmetic of Active Management , William F. Sharpe, Financial Analysts Journal , 1991 Luck versus Skill in the Cross-Section of Mutual Fund Returns , Eugene Fama and Kenneth French, Journal of Finance , 2010 Winning the Loser's Game, 8th edition , Charles D. Ellis Show notes available at retirereadypodcast.com Episode 15











