Find partners
The Alignment Show

The Alignment Show

Hosted by Donn King

BusinessCareersEducationInterviews guests

Episodes

116

Latest episode

Oct 2026

Language

EN

About the show

kingschronicles.substack.com

Listen to episodes

60 recent
October 17, 202629 min

The Strange Quiet After the Finish Line

Have you ever finished something that occupied your life for weeks or months, felt genuinely happy about the accomplishment, and then wondered what to do with yourself? I’ve been experiencing that lately. I recently published my first romantic comedy and finished the draft of the second. What started as a little experiment in writing fiction has grown into a series of six, possibly seven, books. And I’ve discovered that finishing a story brings an emotional experience I hadn’t quite anticipated. There’s satisfaction, certainly. There’s excitement about what comes next. But there’s also a peculiar quiet, almost like the feeling when an airplane lands and you haven’t quite reached the gate. In this episode, I’m exploring that feeling through the experience of writing, but I think it applies to a lot of other things, too. Projects, celebrations, relationships, and the major transitions of life all have their own versions of the finish line. And perhaps we need to pay more attention to what happens afterward. The Big Takeaway Finishing something meaningful doesn’t automatically restore the energy we invested in it. We need energy to begin, to persist, and to finish. But there’s also a fourth part of the cycle worth recognizing: a season of replenishment. Sometimes the most valuable thing we can do after reaching a goal is to allow ourselves a little time to absorb the experience and recover. In This Episode * The three energies of accomplishment. Drawing on Joanna Penn’s framework of starting energy, pushing-through energy, and finishing energy, I explore how different stages of a project call for different kinds of motivation and persistence. * The unexpected letdown of finishing. Even when the experience has been thoroughly satisfying, completing something substantial can leave us feeling a little depleted or disoriented. Accomplishment and letdown can coexist. * Saying goodbye to imaginary friends. Writing fiction means spending hours every day with people I’ve invented. When their story ends, something changes in that relationship. It’s a little like the empty-nest experience, though obviously not equivalent in significance. * Finding new ways to use our energy. I’m responding by exploring new writing projects, returning to editing and publishing, and shifting among what I call the Five Hats of Writing: writer, editor, publisher, marketer, and business person. * The wisdom of a fallow field. Farmers understand that land sometimes needs a season of recovery. Rest isn’t necessarily inactivity, and it certainly isn’t failure. Replenishment belongs in the natural cycle of productive life. * The many kinds of endings. Finishing a major project, celebrating an anniversary, watching children leave home, or experiencing a loss we never wanted all involve transitions. They’re very different experiences, but each reminds us that life changes shape, and we need time to adjust. A Few Things to Try I’ve been thinking about how to navigate the space between finishing one thing and beginning another. Here are a few ideas that might help you, too. * Recognize which kind of energy you need. Are you beginning something, pushing through the difficult middle, or trying to bring it to completion? Different stages call for different approaches. * Pay attention to what changed when you finished. Sometimes the letdown isn’t about exhaustion. It’s about losing a familiar routine, a sense of purpose, or the daily companionship of people who have been part of your experience. * Consider changing activities rather than simply stopping. I’m finding satisfaction in switching from drafting fiction to editing, publishing, marketing, and potentially writing nonfiction. Different activities draw on different kinds of energy. * Give yourself permission for fallow time. You don’t have to fill every available moment with another goal. Recovery and reflection can be worthwhile in their own right. * Ask yourself what you actually need next. Another beginning? Some unfinished details brought together? Or perhaps just a little time to enjoy where you’ve arrived? Quote to Ponder “The energy that gets you across the finish line doesn’t automatically replenish the energy you spent getting there.” I’m learning that there’s meaning in the beginning, in the long middle where we keep showing up, and in finally finishing the work. But there’s also meaning in the quiet afterward. Resources and Links * Joanna Penn: Starting, Pushing-Through, and Finishing Energy — Joanna’s discussion of the different kinds of energy involved in completing a writing project. * How to Write Non-Fiction, by Joanna Penn — An additional discussion of these energies, including the work involved in getting a book into readers’ hands. * The Chemistry Between Us , by Devon Marin — The STEM romantic comedy that started this particular adventure. * Butterfly Copywriting — Val’s approach to taking some of the stress out of creating content for LinkedIn. One Question for You What have you finished recently that left you feeling a little uncertain about what comes next? Maybe it’s a project, a milestone, a family transition, or something else entirely. I’d enjoy hearing about it in the comments, especially if you’ve found ways to honor that space between endings and beginnings. Sometimes, when the airplane lands, you don’t need to rush to the next gate. Maybe you’ve got time to stretch your legs, find a cup of coffee, and simply enjoy being where you are. Article version Have you ever worked on something for so long, with so much energy and attention, that when you finally finished it, you didn’t quite know what to do with yourself? Maybe it was a big project at work. Maybe you spent months planning a wedding or some other major family event. Or maybe you’ve watched a child head off to college, and suddenly a familiar part of your everyday life isn’t there anymore. There’s a peculiar feeling that comes with such endings, even happy ones. I’ve experienced that twice in the past few weeks, and it’s given me something to think about. I’ve been writing novels. Romantic comedies, of all things. And I recently published one and finished the draft of a second one. Right now, we actually have six planned in the series, with an idea for a seventh, but I’ve finished the first two. Now, I’ve been a writer for more than 50 years, but this particular adventure has been something different. And I discovered something about finishing that I think applies to a whole lot more than writing. It has something to do with energy, with the people and things we invest ourselves in, and with what happens after we reach the finish line. And maybe it has something to do with learning when not to keep running. Let’s talk about that. This episode of The Alignment Show is brought to you by The Chemistry Between Us , the new STEM romantic comedy from Devon Marin. Riley is a behavioral scientist who studies relationships. Leo is a science communicator who thinks most problems can be solved if you explain them clearly enough. Then they get handed a microphone, a live audience, and each other. It’s a smart, funny, low-spice romance about two people who are very good at understanding human behavior, right up until their own feelings become part of the experiment. Find The Chemistry Between Us at DonnKing.com/Devon . That’s DonnKing.com/Devon. This episode is also sponsored by my friend Val Roskens Tews—Tews is spelled T-E-W-S, but it sounds like “tease.” Val runs Butterfly Copywriting , and she’s all about taking the stress out of LinkedIn. She calls it stress-free content creation —and honestly, it feels more like having someone in your corner helping you share your message with joy instead of pressure. If you’ve been stuck on what to post or how to show up, check out Val at DonnKing.com/Butterfly . I’ve been trying to find a good way to describe what it feels like to finish a novel, and the image that keeps coming to mind is an airplane coming in for a landing. Think about that for a moment. You’ve been in the air for hours. Maybe you’ve enjoyed the flight. Maybe you’ve been uncomfortable. Maybe there was some turbulence. But you’ve been moving toward a destination, and that movement has occupied your attention. Then the plane descends. Out the window you can see the plane getting closer to the ground, and then you see the edge of the runway rushing by. You feel the wheels touch the runway. There’s that sudden change in sensation as the engines reverse thrust and the plane slows down. You’re still moving, but the flight is essentially over. Then there’s this odd transitional period. You’ve arrived, but you haven’t quite arrived. You’re not flying anymore, but you’re not yet standing on solid ground. And of course, you’ve still got to find your luggage. Somehow, that’s what finishing a novel feels like to me. By the way, my dad knew what it was like to take off and fly, but he didn’t know what landing was like. He was a paratrooper in World War 2, and every single plane he ever got on in his whole life, he had to jump out of. Anyway. A few months ago, I decided to write a romantic comedy, initially just for fun. I’ve written nonfiction books and all sorts of other things over the years, but I wanted to see what happened if I tried my hand at a full-length contemporary romance. Well, one book quickly became two. Then three. And now the series is planned for six books, possibly seven. Apparently, I don’t know when to stop inviting imaginary people into my life. But here’s what surprised me. The more I wrote, the more satisfying it became. I enjoyed the process immensely . The act of writing itself became something I looked forward to every day. I’m a discovery writer, and it was fascinating getting to know these characters, learning how they managed difficulties and challenges and relationships. And then I finished the first novel. Even before publishing it, I started on the second one, and I finished the draft yesterday just a couple of weeks after the first one published. Both times, I experienced this peculiar emotional shift. I was delighted. I was satisfied. I was proud of what I’d accomplished. But there was also this strange little sense of letdown. And it got me thinking. Three kinds of energy One of the people I follow in the writing world is Joanna Penn, an author, podcaster, and independent publishing expert. She’s talked for years about three different kinds of energy involved in completing a book. She calls them starting energy , pushing-through energy , and finishing energy . I find that distinction really useful. Starting energy is the excitement of beginning something new. You’ve got an idea. You can see the possibilities. Everything is fresh and interesting. You haven’t yet encountered all the problems you’re going to have to solve. It’s the energy that gets you off the ground. Starting energy isn’t limited to writing. Think about the excitement of starting a new job, beginning a relationship, launching a business, or deciding to remodel the kitchen. You can almost see the finished result in your mind’s eye, and you’re eager to get started. Then comes pushing-through energy. This is where things get interesting, maybe in the ancient curse way, i.e., “may you live in interesting times.” The novelty has worn off. You’ve discovered that the project is considerably more complicated than you thought. Some of your wonderful ideas turn out to be not quite so wonderful. Plus, now you’re confronted with the necessity of doing the actual work. This is where an enormous number of worthwhile projects stall out. The initial excitement isn’t enough to sustain the effort anymore. You need something different. You need the energy of persistence , of showing up even when the work isn’t particularly exciting. In writing, we sometimes call this the saggy middle. Which, now that I think about it, could describe a number of other conditions I have found associated with getting older. But we’ll leave that alone. Then comes finishing energy. You begin to see the destination. The various threads start coming together. You can sense the shape of the finished work. Suddenly there’s a different sort of drive. You want to bring the thing home. Joanna makes an important distinction here. You might think we’re talking about finishing the book, and it includes that. But in publishing, finishing energy doesn’t stop when you’ve written the last sentence of the first draft. There’s editing, rewriting, production, publishing, and getting the book into the hands of readers. All of that requires energy, too, and that’s a big part of finishing energy. But there’s something about reaching the end of a substantial creative effort that produces a feeling all its own. In my case, I’ve been fortunate. I haven’t had much trouble finding any of those three kinds of energy. Starting was exciting. Pushing through was satisfying. And as I approached the endings of these books, I felt that finishing energy kicking in. I could sense the airplane descending toward the runway. What I hadn’t thought very much about was what happens after the wheels touch down. That’s where my experience of finishing energy has a break in the middle. When the energy changes Joanna Penn has talked about something else that I recognized almost immediately. She describes finishing a book and feeling as though she’s emptied herself into it. For a while, she can have difficulty imagining that she’ll ever write another one. She knows from experience that she will. But that doesn’t make the feeling any less real. She talks about the need to refill the creative well. And here’s something that struck me. The energy that gets you across the finish line doesn’t automatically replenish the energy you spent getting there. You can finish something successfully and still feel depleted. You can be happy about reaching a goal and still feel a little lost when you get there. Those feelings aren’t contradictory. Now, I haven’t experienced the fear that I might never write again. Far from it. I’ve already got more ideas than I know what to do with. Even when I had almost an entire decade of not being able to write, I found that it’s a lifelong addiction, although a positive one. And it honestly never occurred to me that this letdown might be some kind of failure. But I can see how somebody might interpret it that way. After all, we’re surrounded by messages about productivity. Keep going. Keep achieving. Set another goal. Move on to the next thing. So when you finally accomplish something you’ve worked toward for a long time, you might expect to feel nothing but exhilaration. Instead, you may find yourself thinking, “Well. Now what?” I’ve discovered another dimension to that feeling, though, and this one surprised me. Saying goodbye to imaginary friends When I promote my fiction, I sometimes invite people to “come play with me and my imaginary friends.” I’m only partly kidding. A couple of years ago, Ryan Reynolds was in a movie called IF , about imaginary friends. It played with the idea that imaginary companions are important to us as children, and that maybe we shouldn’t be so quick to leave that part of ourselves behind as adults. I think there’s something to that. Fiction is one of the ways adults continue to spend time with imaginary people. We create them, read about them, watch them on screens, and invite them into our emotional lives. And they matter to us. There’s a much bigger conversation to be had about that, and I expect we’ll have it in another episode. But here’s what I’ve noticed in writing these books. For weeks, I’ve spent hours every day with these characters. I’ve listened to their conversations. I’ve watched them make foolish decisions. I’ve worried about their relationships. I’ve tried to understand why they behave the way they do. I’ve watched them surprise me. And yes, I know perfectly well that I made them up. That doesn’t change the experience. They’ve been my daily companions. I’ve even published “interviews” I’ve had with them. And when I finished their story, something changed. It’s a little like the empty-nest feeling when a child leaves home for college. I’m certainly not equating the two experiences in importance or emotional depth. But there’s a resemblance in the sudden change of rhythm. Someone you’ve been accustomed to spending time with every day has moved into a different phase of life. The relationship hasn’t ended, necessarily. But it has changed. In my case, these characters aren’t even gone. I’m writing an interconnected series. Some of them will appear in later books. But the particular story I’ve been living with has reached its ending. I think part of the letdown comes from realizing that I won’t be spending my days quite the same way anymore. That’s worth recognizing, because it’s not limited to books. What comes after the finish line? So I’ve been thinking about how I want to respond to this transitional period. I’ve come up with three things. The first is pretty obvious. I’m starting something new. I don’t know yet exactly what it will be. I’ve got plenty of fiction planned, but I suspect I’ll turn back to nonfiction for a bit. That’s familiar territory for me, and I have several projects waiting for attention. Interestingly, Joanna Penn has talked about using nonfiction as a kind of palate cleanser between fiction projects. I can understand that. Sometimes a change of direction allows you to keep moving creatively without demanding exactly the same kind of energy. It’s a little like changing muscle groups when you’re exercising. I’m still writing, but I have found a deeply different experience in writing fiction than writing nonfiction, maybe because I’m asking something different of myself. The second thing I’m doing is investing in rewriting and the other aspects of publishing . Some time ago, I developed a framework I call the Five Hats of Writing. The idea is that an independent author has to wear five different hats: writer, editor, publisher, marketer, and business person. Even a traditionally published writer these days has to wear four of those five. Each hat involves different skills, different activities, and, I would argue, different kinds of energy. I love the writing hat. Obviously. But I also enjoy editing. I enjoy taking something I’ve written and making it better. I like the process of discovering what works, what doesn’t, and what needs to change. I enjoy the publishing hat, too. Book design, layout, covers, all the decisions that turn a manuscript into a book somebody can hold or read on a screen. And here’s something that makes me a bit unusual among writers. I actually enjoy marketing, though I don’t want it to overshadow the actual writing. I know. Some writers may want to have me examined for liking marketing at all . But I enjoy finding ways to connect a book with the people who might appreciate it. I enjoy thinking about how to communicate what the book offers, and how to help the right readers discover it. So I’m going to invest more attention in doing that effectively with this new book. The business hat is probably my least favorite, particularly the record-keeping part. Tracking expenses and maintaining records don’t exactly make my heart sing. But I understand their importance, and I even find satisfaction in making that part of the operation work well. So, although I’ve finished the initial creative work on these novels, I’ve got plenty of other satisfying work ahead of me. And shifting among those activities gives me a way to keep moving while using different kinds of energy. Although, to be honest, I’m anxious to start on the third book in the series. But the third response may be the most important one. I’m consciously honoring the fallow time. The wisdom of a fallow field Fallow. That’s an agricultural term, and I think it’s a beautiful one. Though my family members for the most part were not farmers, I grew up in a farming community, and I understand a little about the basic concepts. A farmer may allow a field to lie fallow for a season. Instead of planting another crop immediately, the farmer gives the land time to recover. That doesn’t mean the land has become useless, nor does it mean the farmer has given up. It certainly doesn’t mean nothing is happening. The soil is going through processes of recovery and replenishment that can contribute to future productivity. Rest is part of the cycle. I’ve been thinking about that in connection with my writing, but I think the principle goes much deeper. We humans are remarkably good at treating rest as something we have to earn, or worse, as something we have to apologize for. We talk about downtime as though it were wasted time. If we’re not producing something, achieving something, or working toward the next milestone, we begin to feel that we ought to be doing more. But nature doesn’t work that way. There are seasons of planting, seasons of growing, seasons of harvest, and seasons of recovery. We need to recognize that our own lives have seasons, too. Now, I don’t expect to spend the next three months sitting around staring out the window. Although, come to think of it, staring out the window can be a remarkably productive activity for a writer. But I do want to give myself permission to experience this transitional period without immediately trying to fill every available moment. I can begin something new. I can work on editing and publishing. And I can also allow some part of myself to rest. Those things aren’t mutually exclusive. In fact, I suspect that learning to do them together is part of what makes a creative life sustainable. This isn’t just about writing Let me come back to where we started. You may never write a novel. You may have absolutely no desire to write a novel. That’s fine. There are plenty of novels in the world already, although I certainly hope people will keep reading them. But I suspect you’ve experienced something like what I’m describing. Maybe you worked for months on a major project at work. You planned, organized, coordinated, solved problems, and finally brought the whole thing to a successful conclusion. Then you walked into the office the next morning and thought, “What am I supposed to do now?” Or maybe you’ve spent a year helping plan a major family event. Janet and I had a 25th anniversary celebration earlier this year, and there was a lot of preparation involved. When something like that is over, there’s satisfaction in having done it. There are wonderful memories. But there’s also the sudden absence of all those things that had been occupying your attention. As wonderful as it was, mostly what we have now is memories and leftover party supplies in a box. And then there’s the experience of having children leave home. That’s an especially powerful example because it involves so much more than the completion of a project. But the transition illustrates something important. The life you’ve been living has changed. The routines that gave shape to your days have changed. The relationships continue, but in a different form. And you have to discover what comes next. Sometimes, of course, endings aren’t happy. Sometimes they’re painful, or unwanted, or simply complicated. As I’ve mentioned here a few times, our severely disabled daughter passed away back in December, and that was not an ending we wanted. Not every ending feels like a successful landing. But many of them still require us to make a transition, to recognize what’s changed, and to allow ourselves time to adjust. That brings me back to those three kinds of energy Joanna Penn describes. Starting energy. Pushing-through energy. Finishing energy. I think there’s a fourth part of the cycle worth recognizing. It’s not so much another kind of energy as a season of replenishment. It’s the time when we recover the energy we’ve invested, absorb what we’ve experienced, and prepare ourselves for whatever comes next. I think we’d do well to recognize all four parts of that cycle. There’s a tendency to think that the purpose of finishing one thing is simply to make room for starting the next thing. Sometimes it is. But sometimes the space between things deserves our attention, too. The space between One of the things I keep coming back to on this show is the idea of alignment. What does it mean to live in a way that reflects what matters to us? For me, writing matters. Creating matters. Connecting with people matters. But if I value creativity, then I also need to value the conditions that allow creativity to flourish. If I value relationships, I need to recognize that they change over time, and that those transitions deserve attention. And if I value meaningful work, I need to remember that the meaning doesn’t reside exclusively in the moment when the work is completed. There’s meaning in the beginning. There’s meaning in the long middle, where we keep showing up. There’s meaning in finishing. And there’s meaning in the quiet afterward. I think that’s what these past few weeks have been teaching me. I’ve enjoyed writing these novels more than I can easily describe. I’m looking forward to writing more of them. But right now, I’m also allowing myself to notice the strange quiet that comes when a story reaches its ending. I’m going to work on the next things. I’m going to enjoy spending time with my imaginary friends when I return to them. And I’m going to let the field lie fallow when it needs to. So here’s a question I’d invite you to consider. What have you finished recently? What has occupied your time, your attention, perhaps even your identity, for weeks or months or years? And now that it’s finished, what do you need? Maybe you need the excitement of a new beginning. Maybe you need the satisfaction of bringing the remaining details together. Or maybe you need to give yourself permission to enjoy the quiet for a little while. Sometimes when the airplane lands, you don’t have to immediately board another one. We hope, for your sake, you don’t have to run to the next gate like a football player fighting toward the goal line to barely catch your connection. Sometimes it’s good to get off the plane, stretch your legs, and remember why you wanted to make the trip in the first place. And maybe, for a little while, just enjoy being where you are. Maybe there’s time to catch a coffee and read a good book instead of fidgeting and wanting to get on with it. If you get value from the show, consider supporting us in one of the following ways. You can make a one-time contribution or sign up for regular support through Buy Me a Coffee . You can also subscribe on Substack for free OR upgrade to a paid subscription. Your support helps me continue helping you and others, and thank you in advance! All subscribers now receive the following: * The “Big Takeaway” * A bulleted summary of the episode * Practical tips from the episode * A quote to ponder * Prefer text? We turn each podcast into an article. Plus, Founding Members receive ebook copies of all my books as well as a sponsorship message on the podcast at least once a month. That’s our way for saying “thanks for the support!” This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kingschronicles.substack.com/subscribe

October 10, 202615 min

Seeing Like a Writer

What happens when we pay attention differently? Note: for folks who prefer to read instead of watch or listen, an article version is at the end of this. If you’re watching or listening on a podcatcher, you can find the original article at DonnKing.com/113 . I went looking for a bench and came home with a question about how we experience the world. I hadn’t been to Ijams Nature Center in Knoxville for years. But I’m writing a novel that includes a scene along the Tennessee River, and I wanted to get the details right. I remembered a bench beside the boardwalk, but I couldn’t find a photograph or description that confirmed it was there. So I decided to go see for myself. I’ve spent years looking at places through a photographer’s eyes. This time, though, I wasn’t trying to make beautiful photographs. I was taking pictures of stairs, narrow trails, changes in the landscape, and details that might help me reconstruct the experience later. I was looking at Ijams like a writer. That got me thinking about the ways writers observe everyday life: the interesting phrases we overhear, the facial expressions we notice, the small details we collect without knowing whether we’ll ever use them. But why should writers have all the fun? In this episode, I explore what might happen if any of us deliberately paid closer attention to the world around us. Maybe the world wouldn’t change much. But our experience of it might. And that could make a difference in how we live. The Big Takeaway The way we pay attention shapes the way we experience the world. Noticing something doesn’t necessarily change the thing we’re observing. But it can change our relationship with it. And that change may influence how we understand other people, recognize what matters to us, and engage with everyday life. In This Episode * The search for a bench. Why I returned to Ijams Nature Center to research a scene for my current novel, and why getting real-world details right can help make fiction believable. * A photographer’s eye versus a writer’s eye. How my years as a professional photographer shaped the way I see places, and why I found myself taking very different kinds of pictures this time. * Externalizing memory. Why I recorded photographs, videos, and spoken observations along the trail, and how tools such as Obsidian help me preserve thoughts that might otherwise disappear. * The habits of a writer. Listening for interesting language, noticing gestures and expressions, and asking “What if?” about ordinary experiences. * How observation changes experience. Why paying attention to a river, a conversation, or a facial expression may not change the thing itself, but can change our relationship with it. * An invitation to notice. What anyone, writer or not, might discover by approaching familiar people and places with a little more curiosity. A Few Things to Try I’m not suggesting we turn this into another project. Most of us have enough things on our to-do lists already. But here are a few ways to experiment with seeing like a writer. 1. Visit a familiar place as though you’ve never seen it. Imagine you’re going to describe it to somebody who has never been there. What would you need to notice? What details have you been overlooking? 2. Listen to how people say things. Pay attention to word choices, expressions, and gestures. Sometimes the way someone says something tells you as much as the words themselves. Respect people’s privacy, of course. 3. Make a note of something that catches your attention. A phrase, an observation, an interesting question. You don’t need a complicated system. Just somewhere to capture a thought before it wanders off. 4. Notice what you notice. What draws your attention? What makes you curious? What do you tend to overlook? You might discover something about your own values and interests. 5. Ask yourself, “What if?” It’s a question writers use all the time. It might also help you see new possibilities in situations you’ve begun to take for granted. The point isn’t to collect more information. It’s to experience more fully the life you’re already living. Quote to Ponder “The world may not have changed because I was paying attention, but my relationship with it has. That in turn changes the world at least a little.” That’s a thought I’ve been turning over since my walk. How much of our experience is shaped by what we choose to notice? And what might change if we became a little more intentional about that choice? Resources and Links * Ijams Nature Center — The Knoxville nature center that prompted this episode, and the setting for a scene in my current novel. * Obsidian — The note-taking and knowledge-management software I’m learning to use to externalize my memory and creative process. * Google Earth — One of the tools I use, along with Google Maps, when researching real-world settings for fiction. * Devon Marin — My fiction-writing alter ego. Follow along if you’re curious about the novel that sent me looking for that bench. One Question for You Whether you’re a writer or not, what would change if you started looking at the world as though you might someday need to tell its story? I’d love to hear what you notice. If you get value from the show, consider supporting us in one of the following ways. You can make a one-time contribution or sign up for regular support through Buy Me a Coffee . You can also subscribe on Substack for free OR upgrade to a paid subscription. Your support helps me continue helping you and others, and thank you in advance! Article version I’ve been thinking lately about what it means to see the world like a writer. I didn’t really set out to think about that. I set out to find a bench. Let me explain. I went out to Ijams Nature Center in Knoxville today. Ijams has been one of my favorite places for years, although I hadn’t actually been out there in quite a while. Part of the reason is that, as I’ve gotten older, it’s become harder for me to get around. Some of those trails aren’t quite as easy for me to navigate as they used to be. But I’m working on a novel under my pen name, Devon Marin , and I’ve decided to set part of the story at Ijams, specifically, along one of the trails beside the Tennessee River. Now, I could do a lot of the research from home. There are plenty of pictures online. You can look at maps, read descriptions, and get a pretty good sense of the place without ever leaving your chair. If I’m writing about a city or a town, Google Maps and Google Earth can give me almost everything I need. But when it’s a tree-covered area far from a road, you have basically two options: photographs and videos other people have taken, and direct observation. There’s something you can’t quite get from a photograph. For instance, I remembered there being a bench along the boardwalk, next to the river. That bench might be useful for the scene I’m writing. The problem was, I couldn’t find a picture that confirmed whether the bench was actually there. I couldn’t even find other people’s descriptions. I could have just made one up. After all, I’m writing fiction, not a documentary. But I like to get as many of the details right as I reasonably can. Partly, that’s because I think accurate details help establish a sense of reality. There’s a word for that: verisimilitude . It’s one of those words writers like to use when we’re trying to sound as though we know what we’re doing. Basically, it means making something feels true. The interesting thing about fiction is that when you get enough of the real details right, readers are often more willing to follow you when you need to bend reality a little. Plus, if somebody happens to know the location, there’s an added pleasure in recognizing it. A little Easter egg. A moment of thinking, “Hey, I’ve been there! I know that bench!” Besides, the weather has finally started feeling like October around here, and I figured some outdoor time would do me good. So off I went to Ijams, camera in hand, on a mission to find a bench. Somewhere along the way, I noticed something else. I was looking at the place differently. I spent years working as a professional photographer before moving to the Knoxville area. Even after leaving that work, I still tended to look at scenery with a photographer’s eye. If I’d gone out there primarily to make photographs, I would have been looking for interesting compositions, good light, unusual angles, that sort of thing. But that’s not what I was doing. I took a bunch of pictures that probably wouldn’t win any photography contests. In fact, some of them wouldn’t even qualify as particularly good snapshots. And that’s fine, because I wasn’t trying to create photographs. I was trying to create a record. I wanted to remember where the trail narrowed, where it widened, where the stairs appeared, how the boardwalk related to the river, what you could see from one point and what you couldn’t see until you got a little farther along. There were stairs I didn’t remember being there at all. I shot several short videos as I walked, sometimes narrating what I was seeing and experiencing, not for me to publish, but for me. I wanted to be able to, in essence, come back later when I was sitting at my computer writing the scene, and remember not only what I saw, but what I was thinking and experiencing as I walked. In other words, I was externalizing my memory. That’s when I started thinking about how writers experience the world. You see, I don’t just do that when I’m researching a scene. I do it all the time. Honestly, I don’t know if I’m a writer because I think that way, or if I think that way because I’m a writer. But I’m not sure if everyone does it. Maybe they do. I’ll hear somebody use an interesting phrase, and I’ll make a mental note of it. Sometimes an actual note. I just went through some geeky maneuvering to make sure a note I make on my phone will automatically show up on my laptop when I get to it. I don’t mean that I’m deliberately intruding on people’s private conversations. But if you’re sitting in a coffee shop and somebody at the next table says something in a particularly colorful way, it’s hard not to notice. If you’re a writer, sometimes you’ll think, “Oh, that’s good. I need to remember that.” I pay attention to the way people talk. The way their words don’t always match their expressions. The way somebody can communicate an entire paragraph with one raised eyebrow. I notice little things about places and people that might someday become useful in a story. Sometimes a completely unrelated thought will wander into my head, and I’ll jot it down. Now, finding that note again when I need it? That’s another matter entirely. I’ve been learning to use Obsidian , a note-taking and knowledge-management program, to help with that. Not just as a place to store information, but as a way to externalize more of my thinking and creative process. My own brand of ADHD means my brain is very good at producing ideas. Keeping track of them is a different skill. But here’s what I realized while I was walking around Ijams: I’m pretty sure not everybody goes through life quite this way. Maybe you do. Maybe this isn’t unusual at all. But I suspect people who write, especially people who write stories, develop certain habits of observation. We pay attention to things we might otherwise pass over. We listen for language. We notice details. We wonder why people behave the way they do. And sometimes we look at something perfectly ordinary and start asking, “What if?” There’s an idea you sometimes hear associated with science, that the very act of observing something changes the thing being observed. That’s a much more complicated scientific question than the way it’s usually presented, and I’m not going to pretend to explain quantum mechanics here. But it got me thinking about something similar in everyday life. When I stopped to notice the light playing across the Tennessee River, I don’t think I changed the river. When I noticed how the trail curved, I didn’t change the trail. And when I hear somebody use an interesting turn of phrase, I haven’t necessarily changed that conversation. But I have changed something. I’ve changed my experience of it. Instead of simply passing through the place, I’m engaging with it. Instead of just hearing words, I’m listening to how somebody uses them. Instead of seeing a facial expression and moving on, I’m wondering what emotion might be underneath it and whether I’ve understood it correctly. The world may not have changed because I was paying attention. But my relationship with it has. That, in turn, changes the world, at least a little. Here’s where I think this starts to matter beyond writing. I’ve said many times on this podcast that The Alignment Show isn’t primarily a podcast for writers. We certainly talk about writing a lot, and we talk with writers a lot. Partly that’s because writing is a big part of my own life, so naturally it’s one of the ways I make sense of things. But I also think that some of the habits and questions that draw people toward writing have value whether you ever intend to write a book or not. This may be one of those things. What would happen if you started seeing your everyday life the way a writer sees it? I don’t mean with the intention of turning it into a story. Just with the intention of noticing it. What would you hear if you listened more carefully to the way people talked, as if you were going to write about it some day? What might you notice about the people around you if you paid attention to their expressions, their gestures, the little things they do when they’re uncomfortable or happy or uncertain? What might you discover about a familiar place if you walked through it as though you were going to have to describe it to somebody who had never been there? And what might you notice about yourself ? When you’re paying attention to the world around you, you may also start paying attention to your own responses. What catches your attention? What makes you curious? What do you tend to overlook? Why does one small detail stay with you while a hundred others disappear almost immediately? I don’t think we have to turn all of this into another assignment, or another thing to put on the to-do list. Lord knows I’ve got enough of those. But I wonder whether developing the habit of noticing might make everyday life a little richer. Maybe it would make us more curious. Maybe it would help us understand other people a little better. Maybe it would make us more aware of the world we’re already living in instead of constantly rushing toward the next thing. And maybe it would give us a better understanding of what matters to us, because we start noticing what we’re drawn toward. I went to Ijams because I wanted to make sure I could describe a particular place accurately in a fictional story. I came home with photographs, videos, a better understanding of the trail, and some useful material for the book. But I also came home thinking about the way I look at the world, wondering how much of my experience is shaped by what I choose to notice. So that’s the question I’d like to leave with you today. Whether you’re a writer or not, what would change if you started looking at the world as though you might someday need to tell its story? What would you notice? What would you remember? And how might that change the way you live in it? If you’re curious about the novel that will incorporate today’s trip to Ijams, you might want to connect with my alter ego at DonnKing.com/DevonMarin , or follow me wherever you’re hearing this podcast or reading the article. I’m Donn King, and this has been The Alignment Show , where what matters meets real life. Thanks for spending some time with me. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kingschronicles.substack.com/subscribe

October 2, 20261 hr 5 min

Kevin on Kraft: Writing Characters Who Aren’t You

[Note: this post contains the podcast and its show notes along with the article version. Enjoy whichever one connects with you best. If you’re listening on a podcatcher and want the article version, head over to DonnKing.com/112.] One of the things I enjoy about talking with Kevin Tumlinson is that I can start with a question I think I understand and discover that I was actually asking something bigger. That happened again in this third installment of Kevin on Kraft. “Kevin on Kraft?” you ask. If you don’t know about it, here are the first two episodes in this special series on The Alignment Show . Last time, Kevin made an almost offhand comment that some of his characters are smarter than he is. That stuck with me. Because how exactly do you write a mind you don’t possess? You can research what a physicist knows, for instance, but knowing facts and thinking like that person aren’t quite the same thing. From there, we wandered into something broader: writing people who aren’t like us. Different backgrounds. Different genders. Different experiences. Even people whose choices we find reprehensible. And eventually we landed on what may be the real question underneath all of it: What makes a character feel like a human being rather than something the author constructed? As usual, Kevin and I found a few side roads along the way. We talked about villains, Thanos, Batman, Jack Reacher, Star Trek, watery tuna salad, and why a writer might want access to a time machine. You know. Craft. Big Takeaway A believable character doesn’t have to be like the writer, but the writer has to understand the character well enough to see the world from inside that character’s logic. That includes villains. It includes characters whose lives and backgrounds differ radically from our own. And it even includes recurring characters who need to grow without changing so much that readers no longer recognize the person they came back to see. Perhaps most interestingly, Kevin suggested that character growth doesn’t stop at the edge of the page. Sometimes the person who changes over the course of a story… is the reader. What We Talked About * How to write someone smarter than you are. Kevin points out that his character Dan Kotler has an advantage Kevin doesn’t: Kevin can stop, research, revise, and return to an earlier scene. The character gets to benefit from the author’s hindsight. * Writing across differences without reducing people to categories. We talk about characters of different races, cultures, and genders, and the danger of trying so hard to portray a category that we stop portraying a person. * Why the craft should disappear. Kevin compares good writing to sculpture: if we’re staring at the chisel marks, we’re not seeing the statue. The same principle applies to voice, characterization, and even book design. * Why villains need an internal logic. People generally don’t experience themselves as “the bad guy,” even the ones we perceive as the bad guy. A compelling antagonist sees reasons for doing what they do. Understanding those reasons doesn’t mean agreeing with them, but it keeps them from being cardboard. * How series characters can change without becoming different characters. Kevin distinguishes between a protagonist who changes and one who serves as a catalyst for change. Jack Reacher, Batman, and the crew of the Enterprise help us explore why some characters need to return largely to baseline while the people and world around them change. * The reader has a character arc, too. Stories don’t simply happen to fictional people. We bring ourselves to them, make meaning from them, and sometimes finish a book seeing something differently than we did when we began. Practical Tips When you’re writing someone unlike yourself, start with the person before the category . Research matters, and sometimes talking with people who actually have the experience you’re portraying matters enormously. But research shouldn’t become a substitute for creating an individual human being. Give yourself permission to make a character smarter than you. Drafting and revision give you something your character doesn’t have: time. Research the answer. Think for three days about the insight your brilliant character produces in three seconds. Then let them have the credit. For recurring characters, ask what is core and what can change. Relationships, experiences, scars, knowledge, and circumstances can accumulate without replacing the qualities that made readers care about the character in the first place. When writing an antagonist, try asking not, “Why is this person evil?” but, “Why does this choice make sense from where this person is standing?” You don’t have to approve of the answer. You just need to understand it. Finally, don’t force the theme too early. Kevin argues that theme often emerges from the story itself. Write honestly enough and you may discover meaning you didn’t consciously put there. Once you see it, you can strengthen it in revision. Note: we might dig into theme next time. Quote to Ponder “Don’t downplay your role in the story. You are a character in this story as well.”— Kevin Tumlinson Resources Kevin Tumlinson / The Wordslinger Kevin and I share these Kevin on Kraft conversations with both of our audiences. Check out The Wordslinger for Kevin’s ongoing conversations about writing, publishing, and the writing life. Kevin Tumlinson’s books Kevin has written soooooo many books. I especially like his Dan Kotler books and his Alex Kane books. He can keep you reading for months. Ray Bradbury, Zen in the Art of Writing Kevin mentioned that he’s currently reading Bradbury’s collection of essays on writing and recommends it. Amazon or Bookshop Paulo Coelho, The Alchemist Kevin used The Alchemist as an example of a book he can reread and find himself changed by the experience. Amazon or Bookshop The Chemistry Between Us by Devon Marin I also mention my new STEM romantic comedy during the conversation. You can find it at DonnKing.com/Devon . Article Version Writing People Who Aren’t You How do you write a character who is smarter than you are? That question sounds almost like a paradox. If I’m not capable of thinking at the level my character does, how am I supposed to write what that character thinks? Kevin Tumlinson has a wonderfully practical answer: cheat. Not really, of course. But a fictional character has an enormous advantage over a real human being. The character has an author who can travel through time. Kevin’s Dan Kotler is considerably smarter than Kevin claims to be. Kotler can make connections quickly. He can retrieve obscure information at exactly the moment he needs it. He can reach conclusions that might take the rest of us considerably longer. But Kotler doesn’t actually have to do any of that in real time. Kevin can write the scene, discover that something is wrong, research it, think about it, and come back later. He can spend hours figuring out something Kotler appears to figure out in seconds. The character gets the benefit of the author’s hindsight. That led us to a related question: What happens when the difference between writer and character isn’t intelligence? What if the character comes from a different culture? A different racial background? A different gender? A life experience the author has never had? Research certainly matters. I mentioned a character I’m currently writing who owns a kayaking business. I happen to know someone who owns a kayaking business, so I interviewed her. She also has a Native American background, which gives me another reason to listen rather than assume. But Kevin made an important distinction. When he writes a character whose background differs from his own, he tries first to write the person . That sounds obvious until you consider how easily writers can do the opposite. We can become so concerned with writing “a woman” or “a Black character” or “a scientist” that the category begins doing the work the character should be doing. The result can become stereotype even when the writer was specifically trying to avoid stereotype. Kevin is particularly cautious about things like dialect for that reason. A little may help establish voice or place. Too much can make the author’s hand painfully visible. That connected with something we had already stumbled across earlier in the conversation. Good craft tends to disappear. We had been talking about book layout. When a book is designed well, readers generally don’t stop and admire the typesetting. The design gets out of the way and lets them read. Kevin suggested that authorial voice can work the same way. If readers are noticing the writer showing off on every page, they may not be noticing the character or the story. He compared it to sculpture. We should see the statue, not the chisel marks. What about characters we don’t want to identify with? Villains create an interesting problem because an antagonist who wakes up every morning thinking, “Mwuhahaha! What evil can I accomplish today?” usually isn’t particularly convincing. People tend to experience themselves as the central character in their own lives/stories. While other people may be evil or stupid, they have reasons for their choices. They justify themselves. They believe what they’re doing makes sense. That doesn’t make their actions right . It makes them human . We wound up talking about Thanos from the Marvel movies. His solution to the universe’s problems is monstrous, but the story gives him a rationale for it, including his own background of deprivation. More importantly, it gives that rationale enough internal coherence that an audience can understand how he sees himself. It doesn’t excuse evil. But understanding why a character believes something is not the same as agreeing with the character. In fact, that ability to understand without agreeing may be one of fiction’s most useful tricks. A story can temporarily put us behind somebody else’s eyes. That brought us, eventually, to the person we hadn’t talked much about yet. The reader. Kevin said something that I think may be the most interesting idea in the whole conversation: when we engage with a story, we become part of it. Characters may have arcs, but readers can have them, too. He used The Alchemist as an example. When he rereads it, the fictional character changes over the course of the book, but so does Kevin. He reaches the end with a slightly different perspective than he had when he began. This remains true even though he has read the book multiple times. Writers constantly encounter readers who find things in our stories that we didn’t consciously put there. A reader tells us how much they appreciated the theme we developed, and we think, I did? (And sometimes we just nod and say, “Yes, yes, I’m glad you noticed that!”) Kevin thinks writers can get into trouble when we begin with the theme and try to build a story around a lesson we want to teach. That can turn fiction into preaching with characters attached. Instead, he suggests writing the story and paying attention to the themes that emerge naturally. If something meaningful appears, revision gives us the opportunity to strengthen it. That brings us right back to that fictional time machine. We write. We discover. We go back. We understand a little more. Then we lay another piece of track. And, as it happens, that last image opened another conversation Kevin and I will probably have somewhere down the road. Three episodes in, you probably know how that goes. I’m Donn King. I write about what it means to live and speak from your values, without sanding off the quirks that make a voice worth hearing. This space is where I reflect, tell stories, and stay connected with readers who value clarity, honesty, and the long work of becoming who we’re meant to be. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kingschronicles.substack.com/subscribe

September 18, 202617 min

Discovering What Comes Next

Lately, I’ve been looking forward to getting to my desk. That may sound like an ordinary thing for a writer to say. But after struggling with anhedonia, the absence of pleasure even in things I knew were worthwhile, that eagerness means something to me. Writing fiction has been bringing it back. I want to find out what my characters will do next, even though I’m supposedly the person in charge. Apparently, nobody has explained that arrangement to them. In this solo episode, I explore discovery writing, the feeling of being absorbed in creative work, and the possibility of returning to something you love with all your life experience behind you. I also talk about why I’m likely to write out these solo episodes before recording them. Some of the discovery happens while I’m figuring out what I want to say. The big takeaway My eagerness to return to storytelling is something I want to pay attention to. It tells me something about what belongs in my life. Your curiosity may offer something worth noticing, too. In this episode * I describe how writing fiction has renewed my enjoyment, while keeping that experience distinct from anyone else’s experience of depression. * I consider how creative absorption may overlap with flow, drawing on the work of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Martin Seligman . * I explain why “discovery writer” fits the way I work, even when I have a destination in mind. * I connect the pleasure of discovering characters with everyday discoveries, from a new restaurant to a solution for a stubborn problem. * I reflect on Bruce Robert Coffin ’s return to writing after nearly three decades in law enforcement. * I share why scripting solo episodes feels like a return to my own writing roots. Something to try Ask yourself: What am I curious enough to come back to? It might be a story, a skill, an unanswered question, or something you once loved. Give yourself a little room to explore it without requiring yourself to know where it will lead. And when you notice that small lift of discovery, pay attention. I’m learning to take my own eagerness seriously. A thought to carry with you “Being excited to get to the desk is something I want to pay attention to. It tells me something about what belongs in my life.” Mentioned in this episode * Flow and engagement : The University of Pennsylvania’s Positive Psychology Center explains engagement within Martin Seligman’s PERMA framework and its connection to Csikszentmihalyi’s work on flow. * Bruce Robert Coffin on The Indy Author Podcast : Matty Dalrymple’s conversation, “Writing the Stories Only Life Can Teach You.” * The Sparklight Chronicles , my fictional parables exploring nonfiction principles. * The Chemistry Between Us and The Signal Between Us , the first two books in the series I’m writing as Devon Marin . * Kevin on Kraft , my ongoing conversations with Kevin Tumlinson about writing, creativity, and making things. With thanks to this episode’s sponsors Butterfly Copywriting : Val Roskens Tews helps take the stress out of creating LinkedIn content and sharing your message. The Chemistry Between Us , by Devon Marin: Meet Riley, a behavioral scientist, and Leo, a science communicator with ADHD, in the first book of a planned STEM romantic-comedy trilogy. Through September 30, sample two chapters through Diversity is Mainstream , a promotion featuring nearly fifty writers whose stories include neurodiverse characters. After the promotion ends, the excerpt will remain available at DonnKing.com/Devon . What have you been discovering lately—or what are you ready to come back to? I’d love to hear about it in the comments. Article Version Good morning, good evening, good afternoon, wherever you are in the world, welcome once again to The Alignment Show , where we talk about where what matters meets real life. I’m your host, Donn King… And today, I want to talk about the pleasure of finding out what happens next. Which is a slightly odd thing to say when I’ve written this episode out before recording it. Presumably, I should know what happens next. It’s right there on the page. But writing the page is where some of the discovery happens. Lately, that discovery has been doing something for me that I haven’t felt in quite this way for a long time. I’ve been looking forward to getting to my desk. If that sounds like a small thing, stay with me. There’s a little more behind it. I don’t want every solo episode to become a progress report on the STEM romantic comedy I’m writing under the Devon Marin pen name. You have your own life. You don’t need a standing appointment with my imaginary people. Although they are pretty good company. But most of my recent writing experience has happened there, and something about that experience seems worth sharing even if you never read a romance novel, never write a book, and would prefer that imaginary people make their own coffee. There are moments when the writing feels as though it’s coming through me instead of from me. I’m still doing the work. I’m choosing words, figuring out what fits, and eventually going back to fix things that seemed brilliant at the time. But while I’m in it, I’m often following something that feels as though it’s already moving. That may overlap with what psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi called flow. Martin Seligman includes that kind of deep engagement in his work on well-being, too. You become absorbed in something that stretches your abilities, and the doing becomes rewarding in itself. I’m not sure every moment I’m describing qualifies as flow. Some of it may simply be curiosity. But I recognize that feeling of being caught up in the work, with less attention left over for watching myself do it. The ancient Romans had an idea that gives me a useful image for this. A person could have a genius: an accompanying spirit. That’s a different use of the word from the way we call somebody a genius today. The Greeks had related ideas about spirits and inspiration, although the traditions weren’t identical. I even harnessed the idea of Muses for my parable series, The Sparklight Chronicles . I don’t think a helpful little spirit has moved into my office and started dictating dialogue. If one has, I’d appreciate some help with proofreading. Still, I understand the appeal of the image. It captures how surprising creativity can feel from the inside. I put the words down, and sometimes I’m also the first person surprised by them. Longtime listeners and readers of several of my books have heard me talk about a realization I had years ago. I thought I wasn’t writing because I was depressed. In my case, I came to recognize that I was depressed because I wasn’t writing. I was leaving out something important to the way I live and make sense of life. While that realization mattered, it also didn’t resolve everything. Even afterward, I struggled with anhedonia, a loss of the ability to experience pleasure. It’s a frequent part of depression. For me, the defining feeling wasn’t sadness so much as the absence of enjoyment. Things could be worthwhile, and I could intellectually know they were worthwhile, without feeling much pleasure in them. I’m describing my experience here. I wouldn’t assume someone else’s depression has the same cause, or that writing would do for them what it has done for me. But I began to feel some of that pleasure again while writing The Sparklight Chronicles . Those books use fictional parables to explore nonfiction principles. I got to tell stories, get to know people I’d invented, and watch what happened when those people ran into the kinds of problems the books were exploring. Since I started writing pure fiction this year, that eagerness has become much stronger. I find myself wanting to get back to the desk. I want to find out what these people are going to do. A romantic comedy gives me a setting and a set of possibilities. But the storytelling itself seems to be what’s waking up my excitement: people with things they want, things they’re afraid of, and a remarkable capacity to complicate their own lives. You know. People. With The Chemistry Between Us , I had an endpoint in mind. I knew something about where I wanted the story to arrive. But knowing the destination still left a lot to discover along the way. How would these two people respond in this situation? What would one of them say that the other would misunderstand? What might they finally admit after spending a considerable amount of energy avoiding it? I could get excited about following them around even when I knew where we were headed. Now I’ve started the second book, The Signal Between Us . Its main characters were supporting characters in the first book, so I already know them to some degree. I know the starting setup. Beyond that, I have no idea where it’s going. That is either an exciting creative process or an alarming business plan. Possibly both. I know who the main characters will be in the third book, too. I know how they meet. That’s about all I know so far. Writers sometimes describe this as the difference between plotters and pantsers. Plotters work out the story ahead of time. Pantsers fly by the seat of their pants. A more polite pair of terms is outliners and discovery writers. Most writers probably fall somewhere along a spectrum (and, really, most humans approach life along a similar spectrum), and I lean strongly toward discovery writing. That word, discovery, has been sticking with me. I know that pleasure in other parts of life, too. Discovering a new restaurant, or maybe a new dish at a familiar restaurant. Finding a way to do something that has been annoying me for years. Finally seeing the solution to a problem that kept refusing to cooperate. Finding a cool little neighborhood off the beaten path. Even watching one of those “I was today years old when I found out…” videos and realizing I’ve been making some ordinary task unnecessarily difficult for several decades. There’s a little lift in finding something you didn’t know was there. Writing fiction has been giving me that feeling over and over. I know I’m inventing these people. I also get to discover them as I go, like they have a life of their own. Every choice gives me something else to understand about them, and that understanding shapes the next choice. The fun is getting to know them. There’s a downside, though. I can’t actually sit down with them over a cup of coffee. I’d enjoy that. I have questions. A few of them probably have complaints. The closest I can come is to spend time with them on the page, and then invite someone else into that experience. When you read a story, you bring your own experience and imagination to the people in it. You get to know them, too. So yes, dear listener and reader, I’m inviting you to come along and play with me and my imaginary friends. And I’m encouraging you to discover your own. If that takes the form of stories and characters, wonderful. But discovery has plenty of other places to live. You might follow a question, learn a skill, try something unfamiliar, or return to something you once loved and see what happens now. I’ve been thinking about that returning thing, too. I admire Kevin Tumlinson’s off-the-cuff conversational style for his podcasts. I’ve used that kind of spontaneous delivery myself for years in podcasting and professional speaking, and I enjoy it. There’s a particular energy in hearing an idea take shape as somebody says it. But writing this out first produces a different kind of energy. It allows me to ensure structure and to do some background research. I know the delivery sounds different. I hope to make it effective, to let the words sound like something I’m saying to you, even though I’ve had a chance to work on them beforehand. And right now, writing the solo episodes feels like a way of circling back around to my roots as a writer. Something I heard today helped me think about that. Bruce Robert Coffin was talking with Matty Dalrymple on The Indy Author Podcast . He wanted to write from a young age, but his life included nearly three decades in law enforcement before he published his first novel at fifty-two. He’s gone on to write and co-write multiple books, at least 13 I could find. His professional experience gave him material he could bring to those stories: lived detail, an understanding of people, and experiences that could give his characters emotional weight. What stayed with me was the possibility of returning to an early love with all that life behind you. You return as somebody who has lived, worked, learned things, lost things, and discovered things. You have more to bring to it than you had when you first wanted to begin. That resonates with me. I’ve spent years writing, speaking, teaching, and having conversations. Now I’m finding a particular pleasure in storytelling, and even in writing out what I want to say here before I say it. We’ll still have those natural, spontaneous conversations with guests. I love what can happen when people listen to each other and follow a thought somewhere neither one expected. For the solo shows, though, I’m likely to write them out first. I want to see what I discover in the writing, and then bring that discovery into the conversation with you. Maybe there’s a question in all of this worth carrying into your own week: What are you curious enough to come back to? I’ve noticed how much that eagerness matters to me. Being excited to get to the desk is something I want to pay attention to. It tells me something about what belongs in my life. At this point, I’m not completely sure what we’ll have on our next episode. We have another recording session scheduled with Kevin Tumlinson for Kevin on Kraft , our ongoing conversations about writing, creativity, and the experience of making things. Kevin brings that easy conversational style I enjoy, and we’ll see where the next conversation takes us. I also have some episodes we recorded months ago, and several guests lined up whose recording times we still need to arrange. So there’s more to come, even if I can’t give you the exact order yet. We’ll keep the connection here on The Alignment Show , where what matters meets real life. Thanks for spending some of your time with me. I’d love to hear what you’ve been discovering, or what you’re ready to come back to. And now, I think I’ll go see what my imaginary friends are up to. Here at King’s Chronicles, we explore books, creativity, storytelling, and the complicated work of being human. If you enjoy thoughtful conversations and encouraging resources for difficult seasons, I’d love for you to subscribe and join the community. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kingschronicles.substack.com/subscribe

September 13, 20268 min

Connection Costs Energy. It’s Still Worth It.

Note: I realized that since I’m making all material available to all subscribers, free and paid, it makes sense to just include the article version in the “show notes.” If you’d rather read than watch a video or listen to audio, the Article Version is below the Resources. This one is a little different. I recorded most of this episode in the car while Janet and I were on our way to The Morning Cup Toastmasters 10th Anniversary Summit. (Janet was driving. I promise.) It had been one of those weeks when everything seemed to happen at once. I’d finished a book draft, written a prequel while the manuscript was with an editor, helped prepare for the Summit, and gotten ready to lead both a session on story structure and an ecumenical worship service. And somewhere in there, Friday arrived without a regular episode ready to go. So, inspired partly by my friend Mark Leslie Lefebvre and his remarkable streak of showing up every Friday with Stark Reflections for (at this writing) close to 500 episodes, I decided to hit Record anyway. The audio isn’t great. There’s road noise I couldn’t completely remove. The episode is short. But it led me into something I’ve thought about for years: being an introvert doesn’t mean I don’t need or enjoy people. In fact, sometimes the things that drain us can also be things that matter deeply to us. The Big Takeaway Introversion and human connection aren’t opposites. I can look forward to spending a weekend with friends, speaking, teaching, laughing, and connecting with people while also knowing that, when it’s over, I’m going to need some serious quiet time. Understanding that about myself helps me make room for both. In This Episode * Why introversion and shyness aren’t the same thing * The two characteristics I find especially useful for understanding introverts and extroverts * Why an introvert can be perfectly comfortable speaking in front of a crowd * Why the hardest part of speaking, for me, often comes before and after the speech * How social interaction can be both enjoyable and draining * Why Janet and I sometimes build an extra quiet day into trips involving lots of people * Why our need for solitude doesn’t eliminate our need for human connection * And why sometimes showing up imperfectly is better than not showing up at all Something to Try Pay attention to what gives you energy and what uses it. If connecting with people matters to you but also drains you, don’t assume there’s something contradictory about that. You may simply need to plan for both connection and recovery. Give yourself permission to enjoy the gathering and the quiet afterward. Quote to Ponder “Even though I might be an introvert, we still need human connection.” Resources Toastmasters International — If you’d like a place to practice speaking and communication in a supportive environment, Toastmasters has been an important part of my own journey. Stark Reflections on Writing and Publishing — Mark Leslie’s podcast, and his commitment to consistently showing up, provided a little of the inspiration for this particular episode. Article Version: Connection Costs Energy. It’s Still Worth It. I’m an introvert. That sometimes surprises people because I’ve spent a good portion of my life speaking in front of groups. I taught communication for years. I speak professionally. I’m a pastor. Put me in front of a room full of people with something to talk about, and I’m perfectly comfortable. Put me in the room before or after the speech, when everybody is milling around and talking? That’s different. We often treat introversion and shyness as though they’re the same thing. They aren’t. Shyness involves fear of judgment. Introversion has more to do with how we form our thoughts and restore our energy. An introvert tends to recover through time alone. An extrovert tends to recover through interaction with other people. Introverts prefer to form their thoughts before they speak. Extroverts tend to form their thoughts by speaking. Neither is better. They’re simply different ways of operating. That helps explain why public speaking itself doesn’t particularly bother me. When I’m giving a speech, I’ve had time to prepare. I know what I want to say. There’s structure. The unscripted interaction around it takes more energy. I enjoy that interaction, I just have to take steps to recover. That’s the interesting tension. As I recorded this, Janet and I were traveling to a weekend conference I had genuinely been looking forward to. I knew I would see friends. I’d meet people. I’d teach a session. I’d lead a worship service. There would be conversations and laughter and all sorts of things I value. I also knew I’d be tired afterward. In fact, when we take trips like this, we sometimes stay an extra night simply so we don’t have to rush from an intensely social experience straight back into everything waiting at home. We make room for quiet. Those two things don’t contradict each other. Human beings need connection. Introverts need it, too. The key is learning what connection costs us and making room to replenish what it uses. Extroverts tend to go to conferences anyway. Introverted friends, I recomment you also go to a conference. Meet the friend for coffee. Join the Zoom call. Have the conversation. Plan for the impact, but go. And if you need to go sit quietly somewhere afterward, do that too. Pay attention to what matters. If you get value from the show, consider supporting us in one of the following ways. You can make a one-time contribution or sign up for regular support through Buy Me a Coffee . You can also subscribe on Substack for free OR upgrade to a paid subscription. Your support helps me continue helping you and others, and thank you in advance! All subscribers now receive the following: * The “Big Takeaway” * A bulleted summary of the episode * Practical tips from the episode * A quote to ponder * Prefer text? We turn each podcast into an article . Plus, Founding Members receive ebook copies of all my books as well as a sponsorship message on the podcast at least once a month. That’s our way for saying “thanks for the support!” Here at King’s Chronicles, we explore books, creativity, storytelling, and the complicated work of being human. If you enjoy thoughtful conversations and encouraging resources for difficult seasons, I’d love for you to subscribe and join the community. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kingschronicles.substack.com/subscribe

September 4, 202659 min

Kevin on Kraft: When Your Characters Stop Following Instructions

I missed an episode last week. I could offer excuses, but the truth is more interesting: I’ve been writing. A lot. For the past couple of weeks, I’ve been almost embarrassingly absorbed in The Chemistry Between Us , the first romance novel I’ll publish as Devon Marin. Riley and Leo, the two people at the center of the story, have been carrying on conversations in my head while I’m trying to do other things. I’ve forgotten to eat. I’ve awakened early because I needed to capture something they were saying. I’ve even found myself mildly annoyed that the human body insists on bathroom breaks. Before Kevin and I got into our conversation, I talked a little about that experience and why I think it belongs on The Alignment Show . This isn’t primarily a show about writing. It’s about pursuing what matters to you. Writing happens to be one of the things that matter deeply to me. Whatever your thing is, I think there’s something worth noticing about those moments when you become so engaged with meaningful work that you’re no longer merely being productive. You’re curious. Engaged. Alive. Speaking of curious, if you happen to be curious about The Chemistry Between Us , you can read an excerpt and sign up for a chance to receive an early copy before publication at DonnKing.com/Chemistry . It costs you nothing to check it out. And all of that turned out to be a pretty good setup for this week’s conversation with Kevin Tumlinson, another entry in the “Kevin on Kraft” series. Big Takeaway Characters become interesting when we stop treating them as collections of information and start understanding how they behave. Kevin and I talked about the strange experience writers sometimes have when characters begin making choices we hadn’t planned. But we also got very practical about what creates that illusion of life on the page: consistency, meaningful details, leaving room for the reader’s imagination, and being willing to discover things during the writing process, and then go back and plant what the story needs. Maybe the larger creative lesson is that discovery and craft aren’t opposites. Sometimes discovery gives us the raw material, and craft lets us go back and make it look as though we knew what we were doing all along. In This Conversation * Kevin talks about writing Dan Kotler, the main character in one of his series, and how quickly the character began directing choices and taking stories in unexpected directions. * We compare discovery writing with more structured approaches and talk about what happens when an outline meets characters who have other ideas. * We explore the peculiar experience of “hearing” or experiencing fictional characters as distinct people while still knowing perfectly well where they came from. * Kevin explains why he often avoids detailed physical descriptions and instead lets readers supply much of the picture themselves. * We talk about using a few meaningful details to reveal character rather than stopping the story for a physical inventory. * Kevin reveals one of discovery writing’s useful secrets: when something becomes important in Chapter 19, you’re allowed to go back to Chapter 3 and make it look as though you planned it all along. * We talk about maintaining character continuity across a long series, including the reader who caught Kevin contradicting Dan Kotler’s middle-name history. * And just as we were trying to wrap up, Kevin opened two questions we couldn’t possibly squeeze into the remaining minutes: How do you write someone smarter than you are? And how do you write convincingly characteristics and experiences that differ from your own? Those will help launch our next conversation about character arcs. Practical Tips Give readers the details that matter. A character’s eye color may not matter. A pair of glasses that come off whenever things get serious may tell us something. Let the reader participate. Kevin makes a strong case that readers have enormously powerful imaginations. You don’t necessarily need to describe everything you can see in your own head. Use revision as part of creation. Discovery writers don’t have to foresee every setup and payoff. If the story discovers something important later, go back and “prepare” for it earlier. Track continuity, especially across a series. Small facts become surprisingly difficult to remember after multiple novels, novellas, short stories, and crossovers. And don’t confuse consistency with stagnation . That question became important enough that we deliberately stopped before tackling it. How does a character remain recognizably the same person while still changing? That’s where we’re headed next. Quote to Ponder “You don’t want the plotting to get in the way of the storytelling.” — Kevin Tumlinson I like that because Kevin isn’t arguing that plot doesn’t matter. Quite the opposite. He’s saying that the reader should eventually experience a coherent story, even if the writer discovered that story in a much messier order. Resources Sample of The Chemistry Between Us : DonnKing.com/Chemistry The current BookFunnel promotion (September 2026): Diversity is Mainstream , by Las Olas Press, where their mission is to make diversity mainstream through strong, beautiful main characters and inclusive stories. Check it out for dozens of free books and excerpts! Kevin Tumlinson / Wordslinger Podcast : kevintumlinson.substack.com/s/the-wordslinger-podcast Writers, Ink Podcast : WritersInkPodcast.com Kevin’s Dan Kotler books : Dan Kotler Reading Order Mentioned in the conversation: * On Writing by Stephen King; * The concept of Chekhov’s gun ; * Jaws as an example of letting the audience’s imagination do some of the work; * Jack Reacher ; * Indiana Jones ; * and the storytelling possibilities of a disturbingly old toothbrush. If you get value from the show, consider supporting us in one of the following ways. You can make a one-time contribution or sign up for regular support through Buy Me a Coffee . You can also subscribe on Substack for free OR upgrade to a paid subscription. Your support helps me continue helping you and others, and thank you in advance! All subscribers now receive the following: * The “Big Takeaway” * A bulleted summary of the episode * Practical tips from the episode * A quote to ponder * Prefer text? We turn each podcast into an article . Plus, Founding Members receive ebook copies of all my books as well as a sponsorship message on the podcast at least once a month. That’s our way for saying “thanks for the support!” This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kingschronicles.substack.com/subscribe

August 21, 2026Episode 10821 min

What Are We Amplifying?

What Are We Amplifying? Note: read the article version of this podcast at DonnKing.com/108Art . I use tools to externalize parts of my brain. That sounds more dramatic than it is. A grocery list does it. So does an address book, a mind map, a voice memo, or a conversation with a friend. They let me move something outside my head so I can remember it, examine it, rearrange it, or think about it differently. Artificial intelligence can do that, too. These days, that raises all sorts of questions about creativity, writing, and what remains distinctly human when machines can do things we once thought belonged exclusively to us. In this episode, I’m less interested in deciding whether AI is inherently good or bad than in asking a question I find much more useful: What are we amplifying? The Big Takeaway Human beings have always extended themselves through tools. The important question isn’t simply whether we use them. It’s what we’re using them to extend. Do we become more human, or less? A tool can amplify creativity, judgment, curiosity, and clear thinking. It can also amplify carelessness, dishonesty, and bad judgment. Yes, the technology matters (and that’s not yet another AI-ism; it’s just true). But the human using it remains the one essential element in the outcome. In This Episode * Why Plato’s ancient concern about writing and memory sounds surprisingly familiar today. * How grocery lists, mind maps, notebooks, and conversations externalize parts of our thinking. * Why I think AI may work more like an amplifier than a replacement for human creativity. * What the current anxiety about AI in publishing means for the choices I’m making as a writer. * Why I care more about the value of a finished book than the particular tools used to create it. * What Friedrich Nietzsche’s 1882 experiment with an early typewriter can teach us about how our tools shape our thinking. * Why supposedly “AI-ish” writing habits such as antithesis and em dashes aren’t exactly new inventions. * The questions I think matter more than simply asking whether a particular technology is good or bad. A Few Practical Questions When I’m deciding whether any tool belongs in my work or life, these are the questions I want to ask: * Does this help me think more deeply? * Does it help me communicate more clearly? * Does it help me create something worth creating? * Does it help me treat other people with greater dignity and respect? * Does it help me become more fully the person I actually want to be? Those questions apply whether the tool is a notebook, an iPhone, a calculator, a mind map, or artificial intelligence. Quote to Ponder “We’ve always extended ourselves through our tools. We don’t need to stop doing that. We just need to make sure that what we’re extending is worth amplifying.” Resources and People Mentioned * Plato’s Phaedrus — the ancient dialogue containing Socrates’ account of concerns that writing would weaken memory * Joanna Penn — writer and publishing entrepreneur who encourages creatives to “double down on being human” in the age of AI * Marshall McLuhan — communication theorist associated with the phrase “the medium is the message.” The original book’s title is actually a little different: The Medium Is the Massage . This is a rare instance where an ebook would absolutely not communicate the author’s intent. You can get the print book directly from the publisher . You might also want to read Marshall McLuhan Explained . * Friedrich Nietzsche — philosopher who began using the Malling-Hansen Writing Ball in 1882 when problems with his eyesight made handwriting difficult * My books — which might support you in your own creative journey. I write books that mentor from the shadows, blending storytelling, humor, and humanity to help readers grow, serve others well, and stay human in a complicated world. The point isn’t that every use of every tool is good. Tools can be used carelessly, dishonestly, destructively, or lazily. But we’ve been extending our minds through tools for thousands of years. The question I want to keep asking is what we’re choosing to amplify. If you get value from the show, consider supporting us in one of the following ways. You can make a one-time contribution or sign up for regular support through Buy Me a Coffee . You can also subscribe on Substack for free OR upgrade to a paid subscription. Your support helps me continue helping you and others, and thank you in advance! All subscribers now receive the following: * The “Big Takeaway” * A bulleted summary of the episode * Practical tips from the episode * A quote to ponder * Prefer text? We turn each podcast into an article . Plus, Founding Members receive ebook copies of all my books as well as a sponsorship message on the podcast at least once a month. That’s our way for saying “thanks for the support!” This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kingschronicles.substack.com/subscribe

August 14, 202648 min

Kevin on Kraft: You Don’t Have to Know Where You’re Going

[Note: if you would rather read an article instead of watching or listening, you can read such here .] Sometimes the best conversations start because somebody says something almost in passing. I was listening to Kevin Tumlinson on The Word Slinger Podcast when he mentioned that, for all the talking he does about writing and publishing, he doesn’t get to talk about the actual craft of writing as often as you might expect. Maybe, he suggested, he just needed somebody to ask him questions. Well, I can ask questions. That led to an email, a bad pun about “Kevin on Kraft” (yes, we know it’s cheesy—maybe we’ll make it “Kevin on Craft”), and eventually this conversation. Kevin and I decided to borrow an idea from Rachael Herron and Sacha Black, who periodically record a conversation together and then each use it on their respective podcasts. So you may encounter this conversation here on The Alignment Show , over on The Word Slinger Podcast , or, knowing Kevin, possibly on the back of a cereal box. What started as a conversation about writing craft quickly became something broader: creativity, discovery, getting unstuck, allowing imperfect work to exist, and recognizing that the creative process rarely follows the neat categories we use when we talk about it. The Big Takeaway One idea kept resurfacing for me: you don’t have to know everything before you begin. Kevin often starts a novel with little more than a title and an interesting possibility. The characters emerge as he writes. The plot develops alongside them. And when he gets stuck, he doesn’t necessarily take that as evidence that something has gone wrong. Sometimes he loops back through what he has already written. Sometimes he throws something ridiculous into the story just to see what happens. As Kevin put it, writing gives us an advantage real life doesn’t: “The laws of physics do not apply. So you can, in fact, travel through time and alter the past.” You can discover in chapter six that you needed something in chapter three, then go back and put it there. That sounds obvious once you say it. But it’s remarkably easy to forget when you’re staring at a draft and trying to get everything right the first time. In This Conversation Kevin and I talk about: * Why this experiment in shared podcasting started in the first place, and where “Kevin on Kraft (not cheese)” might go from here. * Kevin’s unusual habit of beginning many of his books with the title , then asking what interesting or ironic idea might be hiding inside it. * Why separating “plot” from “character” can be useful for studying craft even though they’re deeply intertwined when we actually write. * Discovery writing versus outlining, and why most writers probably fall somewhere along a spectrum rather than neatly into one camp. * Why trying to produce a perfect first draft can make finishing the book much harder. * Kevin’s “looping” technique for getting unstuck: going back through earlier material, reading and revising until he regains momentum. * What happens when looping doesn’t work, including the surprisingly useful strategy of throwing something absurd into the story and seeing what it reveals. * Kevin’s “ash bin,” where deleted scenes and discarded material can live instead of disappearing forever. * Why originality usually doesn’t mean inventing something nobody has ever seen before. As Kevin says, the goal is often “the same, but different.” * Why creativity isn’t limited to people who call themselves writers, artists, or creators. Problem solving itself is creative work. Something to Try If you’re working on something creative and you’re stuck, Kevin offers two approaches worth trying. First, loop back . Read what you already have. Make small adjustments as you go. See whether returning to the material gives you enough momentum to move through the place where you stopped. If that doesn’t work, try something unreasonable. Blow up the spaceship. You don’t have to keep it. The point is to break whatever assumptions have trapped you and force yourself to ask new questions. The absurd choice may disappear in revision, or it may reveal the direction the story needed all along. And remember: nothing you’ve already written is sacred simply because you wrote it. You can add something earlier, remove something that no longer belongs, or save good material for another day. Quote to Ponder “All the notes are the same. You’re not inventing new notes. It’s all in how you arrange them. And that’s what makes the music.” — Kevin Tumlinson That applies to considerably more than writing. About Kevin Tumlinson Kevin Tumlinson is an author with more than 70 published books, a longtime independent publishing advocate, and the host of The Word Slinger Podcast . He previously served as Director of Marketing and PR at Draft2Digital and is also one of the co-hosts of Writers, Ink . Kevin Tumlinson website The Word Slinger Podcast Kevin’s YouTube channel Resources Mentioned * Kevin Tumlinson * The Word Slinger Podcast — YouTube and Substack * Kevin’s YouTube channel * Writers, Ink * Rachael Herron / Ink in Your Veins * Sacha Black / The Rebel Author Podcast * Joanna Penn / The Creative Penn Podcast * On Writing by Stephen King — Amazon or Bookshop.org * 20 Master Plots: And How to Build Them — Amazon or Bookshop.org * Scrivener * The Alignment Show Join the Conversation This is something of an experiment for Kevin and me, and we’d genuinely like to know how it lands. Would you like to hear more conversations like this? Are there aspects of writing craft you’d particularly like me to ask Kevin about? And even if you’re not a writer, did you find something in the conversation that applies to your own creative work? Leave a comment here on Substack, or join the conversation on Kevin’s YouTube channel . We already have more things we could talk about. Whether “Kevin on Kraft” becomes a regular thing remains to be seen. But I suspect we’re not finished talking. If you get value from the show, consider supporting us in one of the following ways. You can make a one-time contribution or sign up for regular support through Buy Me a Coffee . You can also subscribe on Substack for free OR upgrade to a paid subscription. Your support helps me continue helping you and others, and thank you in advance! All subscribers now receive the following: * The “Big Takeaway” * A bulleted summary of the episode * Practical tips from the episode * A quote to ponder * Prefer text? We turn each podcast into an article. Plus, Founding Members receive ebook copies of all my books as well as a sponsorship message on the podcast at least once a month. That’s our way for saying “thanks for the support!” This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kingschronicles.substack.com/subscribe

August 10, 20261 min

The Alignment Show Is Back—and We’re Starting with a Conversation

Hi, friends. It’s been a while since we’ve had an episode of The Alignment Show , but we’re starting it back up again. We’ve been on hiatus for a few months as we experimented with different ways of connecting. While Substack Live is a perfectly viable channel, it just wasn’t working well for me. So we’re coming back to our usual format, and we’re starting off really well, I think. This coming Friday, what we intend to do is have a conversation between me and one of our “Stars in Alignment,” Kevin Tumlinson. Kevin has been on The Alignment Show several times, and we decided we would sit down and simply have a conversation. It’s not so much me hosting or him hosting. These episodes will be on both of our channels. We had a conversation that is the beginning of a series of conversations I think you’ll find interesting, whether you’re a writer or not. All of us are creative in one way or another, and there’s going to be material here that will be useful for you. So watch for that releasing this Friday on all your favorite channels. We’ll have it on Substack. We’ll have it on Apple Podcasts and Spotify and all the usual outlets. I’ll look forward to sitting down with you then, here on The Alignment Show . If you just want written posts and don’t want to get notified about our podcasts, you can adjust what you receive from us here. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kingschronicles.substack.com/subscribe

March 20, 202653 min

From Banjo to Memoir: Finding Meaning in the Messy Middle of Life

I wasn’t quite sure what to expect going into this conversation with Matthew Check, but I knew it would be interesting. What I didn’t expect was just how layered it would be. Matthew is a musician-turned-author whose memoir, What Would Philip Roth Do? , weaves together love, identity, creativity, and a fair amount of humor. But what stayed with me after our conversation wasn’t just the story itself. It was the process behind it—the discipline, the vulnerability, and the willingness to tell the truth even when it would be easier not to. We talked about what it means to write honestly, how creativity actually works (hint: it’s not always inspiration), and why memoir is less about recording events and more about making sense of them. There’s also something deeper running through all of this. Matthew’s story—whether he’s talking about bluegrass music, relationships, or imagined conversations with Philip Roth—keeps circling back to identity. Who am I? How did I get here? And what do I do with that truth once I see it clearly? If you’ve ever wrestled with your own story, or wondered whether it’s worth telling, I think you’ll find something here. Resources Mentioned * Matthew Check’s website * What Would Philip Roth Do? * Matthew Check on Spotify and Apple Music (linked from his website) * Bright Eyes: Surviving Our Monsters and Learning to Live Without Them by Bridey Thelen Heidel (mentioned in conversation) * Philip Roth’s books The Big Takeaway Telling your story honestly is less about getting every detail right and more about having the courage to say, “This is how I see my life,” and standing behind it. Bulleted Summary * Memoir is crafted, not just remembered. It requires shaping events into meaning * Creativity isn’t only inspiration; it’s also discipline, repetition, and showing up * Humor can open the door to truth, especially in painful or vulnerable moments * A good editor goes beyond fixing your writing to helping you discover what you’re really saying * Identity often reveals itself through unexpected connections (like bluegrass and Jewish heritage) * Writing a memoir forces a deeper question: “Am I willing to be this honest in public?” Practical Tips * Don’t wait for inspiration. Build a habit of showing up consistently * Find an editor or collaborator who understands your voice, not just your grammar * Write freely first; decide later what stays and what goes * Use humor where it naturally arises. It can make difficult truths more accessible * Engage with other writers or creators. You’re more likely to find the right collaborators that way * If you’re telling your own story, focus on meaning, not just chronology Quote to Ponder “I really do want to make a statement about how I see my life and what happened.” When Your Life Becomes the Material In this episode of The Alignment Show , I sat down with Matthew Check to talk about his memoir, What Would Philip Roth Do? But the conversation quickly moved beyond the book itself. At its core, this is a conversation about what it means to take your own life seriously enough to shape it into a story. Matthew didn’t set out to write a book. He started with a writing class, working through exercises, trying to figure out what he had to say. Over time, something began to emerge: a pattern connecting his love of music, his relationships, and his search for identity. The book took shape slowly, over years, through revision, reflection, and a lot of back-and-forth with his editor. The Myth of the Solo Writer One of the more refreshing parts of this conversation was Matthew’s honesty about the writing process. There’s a common assumption that writers sit alone, produce something brilliant, and send it off into the world. That wasn’t his experience at all. His editor played a central role—not just refining the writing, but helping him discover what the story actually was. Sometimes that meant pushing him to go deeper. Sometimes it meant pulling him back. Either way, it was a collaborative process. It’s a good reminder that writing, even when it’s deeply personal, is rarely a solo act. Creativity: Inspiration vs. Discipline Matthew’s background as a musician added another layer to the conversation. Songwriting, for him, often comes in bursts of inspiration. A melody appears. Lyrics follow. The song almost writes itself. Writing a book, on the other hand, requires something different. It’s less about waiting for the moment and more about creating the conditions for progress—sitting down, doing the work, and continuing even when it feels like a chore. There’s a parallel here to almost any meaningful work. The initial spark matters. But what carries it forward is discipline. Humor as a Path to Truth The humor of life is one of the defining features of Matthew’s memoir. Even in moments that are awkward, painful, or deeply personal, there’s often a thread of self-deprecation or wit running through the story. Humor, in this case, becomes a way of telling the truth without becoming overwhelmed by it. It creates space for both the writer and the reader to engage with difficult material. The Risk of Being Honest At some point in the process, Matthew realized he was going to publish something very revealing. The real challenge of writing such a book lay not in the act of writing itself, but the decision to let other people see it. Memoir raises a question that most forms of writing avoid: How honest am I willing to be in public? For Matthew, answering that question required a kind of courage he hadn’t needed before. Identity in Unexpected Places The connection between Matthew’s Jewish identity and his love of bluegrass music honestly surprised me. At first glance, those two might seem unrelated. But as he described it, they deeper connections in shared musical structures, emotional tones, even cultural overlaps. It reminded me that identity isn’t always as straightforward as we assume. Sometimes it shows up in places we wouldn’t expect. What This Conversation Leaves Me With If there’s one thing I keep coming back to after this conversation, it’s this: Your story doesn’t have to be extraordinary to matter. But it does have to be honest. And honesty—real honesty—takes work. It takes reflection. It takes revision. And sometimes, it takes someone else helping you see what you’re actually trying to say. * What part of your own story have you been hesitant to tell—and why? * Do you think you could write your life honestly, or would you hold something back? * Where in your life have you seen discipline matter more than inspiration? Respond to these and other ideas in the comments. If you get value from the show, consider supporting us in one of the following ways. You can make a one-time contribution or sign up for regular support through Buy Me a Coffee . You can also subscribe on Substack for free OR upgrade to a paid subscription. Your support helps me continue helping you and others, and thank you in advance! All subscribers now receive the following: * The “Big Takeaway” * A bulleted summary of the episode * Practical tips from the episode * A quote to ponder * Prefer text? We turn each podcast into an article. Plus, Founding Members receive ebook copies of all my books as well as a sponsorship message on the podcast at least once a month. That’s our way for saying “thanks for the support!” King's Chronicles is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kingschronicles.substack.com/subscribe

Is this your show?

Claim this listing to keep it up to date, reach guests who want to pitch you, and manage bookings with Guestify.

Claim this listing

More Business podcasts