Find partners
Iowa Type Theory Commute

Iowa Type Theory Commute

Hosted by Aaron Stump

Episodes

190

Latest episode

Aug 2026

Language

EN-US

About the show

Aaron Stump talks about type theory, computational logic, and related topics in Computer Science on his short commute.

Listen to episodes

60 recent
September 15, 2026Episode 114 min

Autoformalization of Fermat's Last Theorem

In this episode, I reflect on the recent announcement that Anthropic researchers have autoformalized the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. That is, they instructed an LLM to create a computer-checkable proof, in the Lean prover, of this theorem, following existing paper proofs in the literature. The resulting proof weighs in at 13 million lines of Lean, a staggering amount.

August 21, 2026Episode 1220 min

A Fireball of Alpha

I talk about my efforts to formalize lambda-calculus with named variables and explicit alpha-equivalence, as originally proposed by Church. One reason to do that, besides just a love of being ornery, is to be able to state and prove theorems about alpha-equivalence. One example class of such theorems concern when alpha-equivalence can be avoided, in the sense that beta-reduction can proceed without any variable capture, while not requiring renaming variables. I have a companion blog post that talks about this, with a link to the repo with my Agda code so far.

August 11, 2026Episode 1122 min

Solving Quadratic Word Equations

A system of word equations is called quadratic if no variable occurs more than twice in it. There is an interesting simple algorithm to solve quadratic systems of word equations, which I talk through in this episode. My source is Chapter 12 of "Algebraic Combinatorics on Words" by Lothaire.

August 3, 2026Episode 1017 min

A little bit about word equations

The problem of word equations is a rather storied one, including frustrated connections to Hilbert's Tenth problem. Word equations relate expressions consisting of concatenations of variables and constant symbols. An example is a X = X a, where X is a variable and a is a constant. A solution maps variables to strings of constant symbols making the two sides identical. In this episode, I discuss the problem a little, and what I learned so far about how it is solved.

July 1, 2026Episode 920 min

Coercive subtyping and coherence

In this episode, I give further arguments in favor of coercive subtyping from a software-engineering perspective. I also explain the critical concept of coherence.

May 7, 2026Episode 88 min

A Strange Deal, Explained

I explain the story from last episode.

May 1, 2026Episode 72 min

A Strange Deal

The Curry-Howard isomorphism for the law of excluded middle, as a radio drama. I first saw a version of this story performed by Phil Wadler and Frank Pfenning (wearing fake horns!) at RTA in Nara, Japan in 2005. This is my take on it. In a subsequent episode, I will explain how the story illustrates the computational interpretation of the law of excluded middle.

April 20, 2026Episode 623 min

Great paper: The Calculated Typer

I discuss a nice paper I quite enjoyed reading, called The Calculated Typer , by Garby, Bahr, and Hutton. The authors take a very nice general look at the specification of a type checker, for a very simple expression language. They then manually derive the actual code for the type checker by effectively trying to prove that this as yet unknown code satisfies its spec. (This is what is meant by calculating the type checker.)

April 2, 2026Episode 513 min

Double-negation translations and CPS conversion, part 2

In this episode, I talk about the control operator callcc, and how it is implemented during compilation using continuation-passing style (CPS). I sketch how CPS conversion (transforming a program with callcc into one in CPS that does not need callcc any more) corresponds to double-negation translation from classical to intuitionistic logic. The paper I am referencing is here .

March 31, 2026Episode 413 min

Double-negation translations and CPS conversion, part 1

In this episode, I talk about a somewhat more advanced case of the Curry-Howard isomorphism (the connection between logic and programming languages where formulas in logic are identified with types, and proofs with programs). This is the identification of double-negation translations in logic, which go back to a paper of Kolmogorov's in 1925, with conversion to continuation-passing style (CPS), a compilation technique. For this episode, we just discuss the idea of double-negation translation: classical theorems can be translated to intuitionistic ones, by adding some double negations. As an example, we talk through the intuitionistic proof of the double negation of the law of excluded middle: not not (p or not p).

Is this your show?

Claim this listing to keep it up to date, reach guests who want to pitch you, and manage bookings with Guestify.

Claim this listing

More Technology podcasts